Worker Empowerment and Subjective Evaluation: On Building an Effective Conflict Culture

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03085

References

  • Akerlof GA (1980) A theory of social custom of which unenployment may be one consequence. Quart. J. Econom. 94:749–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof GA, Kranton R (2010) Identity economics. Economists Voice 7(2):1–3.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ambrus A, Greiner B (2012) Imperfect public monitoring with costly punishment: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3317–3332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellemare C, Sebald A (2019) Self-confidence and reactions to subjective performance evaluations. Technical report, IZA Institute for Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Bester H, Münster J (2016) Subjective evaluation vs. public information. Econom. Theory 61:723–753.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bicchieri C, Dimant E, Gächter S, Nosenzo D (2022) Social proximity and the erosion of norm compliance. Games Econom. Behav. 132:59–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Binmore K, Swierzbinski J, Hsu S, Proulx C (1993) Focal points and bargaining. Internat. J. Game Theory 22(4):381–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton G, Greiner B, Ockenfels A (2013) Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Sci. 59(2):265–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brandts J, Cooper DJ (2007) It’s what you say, not what you pay: An experimental study of manager-employee relationships in overcoming coordination failure. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 5(6):1223–1268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandts J, MacLeod WB (1995) On the strategic stability of equilibria in experimental games. Games Econom. Behav. 11:36–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandts J, Ellman M, Charness G (2015) Let’s talk: How communication affects contract design. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 14(4):943–974.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown M, Falk A, Fehr E (2004) Relational contracts and the nature of market interactions. Econometrica 72(3):747–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmichael HL, MacLeod WB (1997) Gift giving and the evolution of cooperation. Internat. Econom. Rev. 38(3):485–509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cason TN, Mui V-L (2007) Communication and coordination in the laboratory collective resistance game. Experiment. Econom. 10(3):251–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cason TN, Mui V-L (2014) Coordinating resistance through communication and repeated interaction. Econom. J. (London) 124(574):F226–F256.Google Scholar
  • Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2006) Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74(6):1579–1601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaudhuri A (2011) Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature. Experiment. Econom. 14(1):47–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman PT, Deutsch M, Marcus EC (2014) The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice (John Wiley Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Cooper D, Kagel J (2016) Other regarding preferences: A selective survey of experimental results. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 217–289.Google Scholar
  • Cooper R, DeJong DV, Forsythe R, Ross TW (1992) Communication in coordination games. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):739–771.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu CK, Gelfand MJ (2008) The Psychology of Conflict and Conflict Management in Organizations (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York).Google Scholar
  • DeGroot MH (1972) Optimal Statistical Decisions (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Dreber A, Rand DG, Fudenberg D, Nowak MA (2008) Winners don’t punish. Nature 452(7185):348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Egas M, Riedl A (2008) The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperation. Proc. Roy. Soc. 275(1637):871–878.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):57–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falk A, Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2003) On the nature of fair behavior. Econom. Inquiry 41(1):20–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2003) The nature of human altruism. Nature 425(6960):785–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2004a) Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cognitive Sci. 8(4):185–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2004b) Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution Human Behav. 25(2):63–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Fischbacher U, Gächter S (2002) Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature 13(1):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Hart O, Zehnder C (2011) Contracts as reference points: Experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101:493–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econom. Lett. 71(3):397–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gächter S (2007) Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the laboratory and the field and their policy implications. Frey BS, Stutzer A, eds. Economics and Psychology: A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 19–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gächter S, Fehr E (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):980–994.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gächter S, Renner E, Sefton M (2008) The long-run benefits of punishment. Science 322(5907):1510–1510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R (1997) Incentives and careers in organizations. Kreps DM, Wallis KF, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Rockenbach B, Serra-Garcia M (2013) Measuring lying aversion. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93:293–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graham JR, Grennan J, Harvey CR, Rajgopal S (2022) Corporate culture: Evidence from the field. J. Financial Econom. 146(2):552–593.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grechenig K, Nicklisch A, Thöni C (2010) Punishment despite reasonable doubt—A public goods experiment with sanctions under uncertainty. J. Empirical Legal Stud. 7(4):847–867.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groysberg B, Lee J, Price J, Cheng J (2018) The leader’s guide to corporate culture. Harvard Bus. Rev. 96(1):44–52.Google Scholar
  • Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2006) Does culture affect economic outcomes? J. Econom. Perspective 20(2):23–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental-analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):367–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B (2000) Compensation and performance evaluation at arrow electronics. Technical report, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Kagel JH, Kim C, Moser D (1996) Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs. Games Econom. Behav. 13(1):100–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1986) Fairness and the assumptions of economics. J. Bus. 59(4):S285–S300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kampkötter P, Sliwka D (2016) The complementary use of experiments and field data to evaluate management practices: The case of subjective performance evaluations. J. Institutional Theoretical Econom. 172(2):364–389.Google Scholar
  • Kerr S (1975) On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Acad. Management J. 18(4):769–783.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khalil F, Lawarree J, Scott TJ (2015) Private monitoring, collusion, and the timing of information. RAND J. Econom. 46(4):872–890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koszegi B (2014) Behavioral contract theory. J. Econom. Literature 52(4):1075–1118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krupka EL, Weber RA (2013) Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):495–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krupka EL, Leider S, Jiang M (2017) A meeting of the minds: Informal agreements and social norms. Management Sci. 63(6):1708–1729.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (1986) Salaries and piece rates. J. Bus. 59:405–431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leibbrandt A, López-Pérez R (2012) An exploration of third and second party punishment in ten simple games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 84(3):753–766.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • López-Pérez R (2008) Aversion to norm-breaking: A model. Games Econom. Behav. 64(1):237–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lundquist T, Ellingsen T, Gribbe E, Johannesson M (2009) The aversion to lying. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 70(1–2):81–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacLeod WB (2003) Optimal contracting with subjective evaluation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):216–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacLeod WB, Malcomson JM (1998) Motivation and markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(3):388–411.Google Scholar
  • McAdams RH (2017) The Expressive Powers of Law (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Nosenzo D, Görges L (2020) Measuring social norms in economics: Why it is important and how it is done. Anal. Kritik 42(2):285–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ockenfels A, Sliwka D, Werner P (2015) Bonus payments and reference point violations. Management Sci. 61(7):1496–1513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ostrom E, Walker J, Gardner R (1992) Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 86(2):404–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prasnikar V, Roth AE (1992) Considerations of fairness and strategy: Experimental data from sequential games. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):865–888.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmitz PW (2002) On the interplay of hidden action and hidden information in simple bilateral trading problems. J. Econom. Theory 103(2):444–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sebald A, Walzl M (2014) Subjective performance evaluations and reciprocity in principal–agent relations. Scandinavian J. Econom. 116(2):570–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tjosvold D, Wong AS, Feng Chen NY (2014) Constructively managing conflicts in organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1(1):545–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vuong QH (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57(2):307–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber M (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.