Social Audience Size as a Reference Point: Evidence from a Field Experiment

References

• Anderson A, Green EA (2018) Personal bests as reference points. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(8):1772–1776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Apesteguia J, Oechssler J, Weidenholzer S (2020) Copy trading. Management Sci. 66(12):5608–5622.Link, Google Scholar
• Barasch A, Berger J (2014) Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. J. Marketing Res. 51(3):286–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Xiong W (2009) What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long‐standing preference‐based explanation. J. Finance 64(2):751–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barry CT, McDougall KH (2018) Social media: Platform or catalyst for narcissism? Hermann AD, Brunell AB, Foster JD, eds. Handbook of Trait Narcissism (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 435–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Weber M, Welfens F (2011) Reference-point formation and updating. Management Sci. 57(3):506–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Breitmayer B, Mensmann M, Pelster M (2018) Social recognition and investor overconfidence. Preprint, submitted March 15, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3140827.Google Scholar
• Brogaard J, Garriott C (2019) High-frequency trading competition. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 54(4):1469–1497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, He Q, Hong Y, Lee D (2022) How do peer awards motivate creative content? Experimental evidence from Reddit. Management Sci. 68(5):3488–3506.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen T (2018) Round-number biases and informed trading in global markets. J. Bus. Res. 92:105–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Kim KA, Nofsinger JR, Rui OM (2007) Trading performance, disposition effect, overconfidence, representativeness bias, and experience of emerging market investors. J. Behav. Decision Making 20(4):425–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng PY (2007) The trader interaction effect on the impact of overconfidence on trading performance: An empirical study. J. Behav. Finance 8(2):59–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua THH, Chang L (2016) Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Computers Human Behav. 55:190–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport SW, Bergman SM, Bergman JZ, Fearrington ME (2014) Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms. Computers Human Behav. 32:212–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• den Boer AV, Keskin NB (2022) Dynamic pricing with demand learning and reference effects. Management Sci. 68(10):7112–7130.Link, Google Scholar
• Deng J, Yang M, Pelster M, Tan Y (2024) Social trading, communication, and networks. Inform. Systems Res. 35(4):1546–1564.Google Scholar
• Dorfleitner G, Scheckenbach I (2022) Trading activity on social trading platforms: A behavioral approach. J. Risk Finance 23(1):32–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorfleitner G, Fischer L, Lung C, Willmertinger P, Stang N, Dietrich N (2018) To follow or not to follow—An empirical analysis of the returns of actors on social trading platforms. Quart. Rev. Econom. Finance 70:160–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duz Tan S, Tas O (2021) Social media sentiment in international stock returns and trading activity. J. Behav. Finance 22(2):221–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu R, Huang Y, Singh PV (2021) Crowds, lending, machine, and bias. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):72–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Gallus J (2017) Fostering public good contributions with symbolic awards: A large-scale natural field experiment at Wikipedia. Management Sci. 63(12):3999–4015.Link, Google Scholar
• Gemayel R, Preda A (2018) Does a scopic regime produce conformism? Herding behavior among trade leaders on social trading platforms. Eur. J. Finance 24(14):1144–1175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser F, Risius M (2018) Effects of transparency: Analyzing social biases on trader performance in social trading. J. Inform. Tech. 33(1):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Lin M, Au Yeung CM (2014) “Popularity effect” in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):222–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M, Han B (2005) Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum. J. Financial Econom. 78(2):311–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2009) Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. J. Finance 64(2):549–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardie BG, Johnson EJ, Fader PS (1993) Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Sci. 12(4):378–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Hawk ST, van den Eijnden RJ, van Lissa CJ, ter Bogt TF (2019) Narcissistic adolescents’ attention-seeking following social rejection: Links with social media disclosure, problematic social media use, and smartphone stress. Computers Human Behav. 92:65–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He S, Qiu L, Cheng X (2022) Surge pricing and short-term wage elasticity of labor supply in real-time ridesharing markets. MIS Quart. 46(1):193–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heimer RZ (2016) Peer pressure: Social interaction and the disposition effect. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(11):3177–3209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendershott T, Zhang X, Zhao JL, Zheng Z (2021) FinTech as a game changer: Overview of research frontiers. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):1–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Hervé F, Schwienbacher A (2018) Round-number bias in investment: Evidence from equity crowdfunding. Finance 39(1):71–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Burtch G, Gu B, Hong Y, Liang C, Wang K, Fu D, Yang B (2019) Motivating user-generated content with performance feedback: Evidence from randomized field experiments. Management Sci. 65(1):327–345.Link, Google Scholar
• Ilk N, Shang G, Fan S, Zhao JL (2021) Stability of transaction fees in Bitcoin: A supply and demand perspective. MIS Quart. 45(2):563–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1325–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Qiu L (2021) Social Media Analytics and Practical Applications: The Change to the Competition Landscape (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwark Y, Lee GM, Pavlou PA, Qiu L (2021) On the spillover effects of online product reviews on purchases: Evidence from clickstream data. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):895–913.Link, Google Scholar
• Li P, Chang L, Chua THH, Loh RSM (2018) “Likes” as KPI: An examination of teenage girls’ perspective on peer feedback on Instagram and its influence on coping response. Telematics Inform. 35(7):1994–2005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu YY, Nacher JC, Ochiai T, Martino M, Altshuler Y (2014) Prospect theory for online financial trading. PLoS One 9(10):e109458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu S, Yao D, Chen X, Grewal R (2021) Do larger audiences generate greater revenues under pay what you want? Evidence from a live streaming platform. Marketing Sci. 40(5):964–984.Link, Google Scholar
• Lukas M, Eshraghi A, Danbolt J (2017) Transparency and investment decisions: Evidence from the disposition effect. Preprint, submitted May 27, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2975086.Google Scholar
• Meng J, Weng X (2018) Can prospect theory explain the disposition effect? A new perspective on reference points. Management Sci. 64(7):3331–3351.Link, Google Scholar
• Mochon D, Johnson K, Schwartz J, Ariely D (2017) What are likes worth? A Facebook page field experiment. J. Marketing Res. 54(2):306–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moqri M, Mei X, Qiu L, Bandyopadhyay S (2018) Effect of “following” on contributions to open source communities. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(4):1188–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nimalendran M, Pathak P, Petryk M, Qiu L (2025) Informational efficiency of cryptocurrency markets. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 60(3):1427–1456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odean T (1998) Are traders reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance 53(5):1775–1798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oehler A, Horn M, Wendt S (2016) Benefits from social trading? Empirical evidence for certificates on wikifolios. Internat. Rev. Financial Anal. 46:202–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park J, Konana P, Gu B, Kumar A, Raghunathan R (2013) Information valuation and confirmation bias in virtual communities: Evidence from stock message boards. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1050–1067.Link, Google Scholar
• Pelster M, Breitmayer B (2019) Attracting attention from peers: Excitement in social trading. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 161:158–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelster M, Hofmann A (2018) About the fear of reputational loss: Social trading and the disposition effect. J. Banking Finance 94:75–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petryk M, Qiu L, Pathak P (2023) Impact of open-source community on cryptocurrency market price: An empirical investigation. J. Management Inform. Systems 40(4):1237–1270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phua J, Ahn SJ (2016) Explicating the ‘like’ on Facebook brand pages: The effect of intensity of Facebook use, number of overall ‘likes’, and number of friends’ ‘likes’ on consumers’ brand outcomes. J. Marketing Comm. 22(5):544–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Kumar S (2017) Understanding voluntary knowledge provision and content contribution through a social-media-based prediction market: A field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):529–546.Link, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Chhikara A, Vakharia A (2021) Multidimensional observational learning in social networks: Theory and experimental evidence. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):876–894.Link, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Shi Z, Whinston AB (2018) Learning from your friends’ check-ins: An empirical study of location-based social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):1044–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Reith R, Fischer M, Lis B (2020) Explaining the intention to use social trading platforms: An empirical investigation. J. Bus. Econom. 90(3):427–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rui H, Whinston A (2012) Information or attention? An empirical study of user contribution on Twitter. Inform. Systems e-Bus. Management 10(3):309–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sciara S, Contu F, Bianchini M, Chiocchi M, Sonnewald GG (2023) Going public on social media: The effects of thousands of Instagram followers on users with a high need for social approval. Current Psych. 42(10):8206–8220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen Z, Zheng E, Jiang W (2022) A machine learning approach to mitigating irrationality in copy trading. Preprint, submitted December 23, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4298755.Google Scholar
• Shriver SK, Nair HS, Hofstetter R (2013) Social ties and user-generated content: Evidence from an online social network. Management Sci. 59(6):1425–1443.Link, Google Scholar
• Spielberger CD, Reheiser EC (2009) Assessment of emotions: Anxiety, anger, depression, and curiosity. Appl. Psych. Health Well‐Being 1(3):271–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Statman M, Thorley S, Vorkink K (2006) Investor overconfidence and trading volume. Rev. Financial Stud. 19(4):1531–1565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sui P, Wang B (2022) Social transmission bias: Evidence from an online investor platform. Preprint, submitted April 27, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4081644.Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Dong X, McIntyre S (2017) Motivation of user-generated content: Social connectedness moderates the effects of monetary rewards. Marketing Sci. 36(3):329–337.Link, Google Scholar
• Tan W, Zhang J (2021) Good days, bad days: Stock market fluctuation and taxi tipping decisions. Management Sci. 67(6):3965–3984.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (2012) The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• The Insight Partners (2022) Social trading platform market forecast to 2028. Research and markets. Accessed February 10, 2025, https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5576270.Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Stephen AT (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1039–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesan S, Valecha R, Yaraghi N, Oh OO, Rao HR (2021) Influence in social media: An investigation of Tweets spanning the 2011 Egyptian revolution. MIS Quart. 45(4):1679–1714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang H, Du R, Shen W, Qiu L, Fan W (2022) Product reviews: A benefit, a burden, or a trifle? How seller reputation affects the role of product reviews. MIS Quart. 46(2):1243–1272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White SB, Neale MA (1994) The role of negotiator aspirations and settlement expectancies in bargaining outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 57(2):303–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang M, Ren Y, Adomavicius G (2019) Understanding user-generated content and customer engagement on Facebook business pages. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):839–855.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang XM, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.Crossref, Google Scholar