Secondary Market Monetization and Willingness to Share Personal Data

References

• Abowd JM, Schmutte IM (2019) An economic analysis of privacy protection and statistical accuracy as social choices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(1):171–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Gross R (2009) Predicting social security numbers from public data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(27):10975–10980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Grossklags J (2005) Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security Privacy 3(1):24–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Grossklags J (2008) What can behavioral economics teach us about privacy. Acquisti A, Gritzalis S, Lambrinoudakis C, De Capitani di Vimercati S, eds. Digital Privacy: Theory, Technologies, and Practices (Taylor & Francis Group, New York), 363–374.Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2015) Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347(6221):509–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, John L, Loewenstein G (2012) The impact of relative standards on the propensity to disclose. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):106–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, John L, Loewenstein G (2013) What is privacy worth? J. Legal Stud. 42(2):249–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Taylor C, Wagman L (2016) The economics of privacy. J. Econom. Literature 54(2):442–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2019) Choice architecture, framing, and cascaded privacy choices. Management Sci. 65(5):2267–2290.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Peer E, Acquisti A (2018) Beyond the privacy paradox: Objective vs. relative risk in privacy decision making. MIS Quart. 42(2):465–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2013) Sleights of privacy: Framing, disclosures, and the limits of transparency. Proc. Ninth Sympos. Usable Privacy Security (SOUPS’13) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–11.Google Scholar
• Arrieta-Ibarra I, Goff L, Jiménez-Hernández D, Lanier J, Weyl EG (2018) Should we treat data as labor? Moving beyond “free.” AEA Papers Proc. 108:38–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Catalini C, Tucker C (2017) The digital privacy paradox: Small money, small costs, small talk. NBER Working Paper No. 23488, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Barocas S, Levy K (2020) Privacy dependencies. Washington Law Rev. 95(2):555–616.Google Scholar
• Becker G, DeGroot M, Marschak J (1964) Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 9(3):226–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birnbaum M (1999) How to show that 9 is greater than 221: Collect judgments in a between-subjects design. Psych. Methods 4(3):243–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandimarte L, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2012) Misplaced confidences: Privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(3):340–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buckman JR, Bockstedt JC, Hashim MJ (2019) Relative privacy valuations under varying disclosure characteristics. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):375–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Calo RM (2011) The boundaries of privacy harm. Preprint, submitted April 28, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1641487.Google Scholar
• Collis A, Moehring A, Sen A, Acquisti A (2021) Information frictions and heterogeneity in valuations of personal data. Preprint, submitted December 2, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3974826.Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ (1993) “How did they get my name?”: An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quart. 17(3):341–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ, Armstrong PK (1999) Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. 10(1):104–115.Link, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S (2009) Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):315–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Hart P (2006) An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):61–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Draper NA, Turow J (2019) The corporate cultivation of digital resignation. New Media Soc. 21(8):1824–1839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J (2012) Can privacy be just another good? J. Telecomm. High Tech. Law 10(2):251–264.Google Scholar
• Glasgow G, Butler S (2017) The value of non-personally identifiable information to consumers of online services: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment. Appl. Econom. Lett. 24(6):392–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg LR (1992) The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psych. Assessment 4(1):26–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg LR, Johnson JA, Eber HW, Hogan R, Ashton MC, Cloninger CR, Gough HG (2006) The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. J. Res. Personality 40(1):84–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham-Harrison E, Cadwalladr C (2018) Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian (March 17), https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election.Google Scholar
• Hill K (2020) The secretive company that might end privacy as we know it. New York Times (January 18), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/18/technology/clearview-privacy-facial-recognition.html.Google Scholar
• Hui KL, Teo HH, Lee SYT (2007) The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment. MIS Quart. 31(1):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James TL, Wallace L, Warkentin M, Kim BC, Collignon SE (2017) Exposing others information on online social networks (OSNs). Inform. Management 54(7):851–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John LK, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2010) Strangers on a plane: Context-dependent willingness to divulge sensitive information. J. Consumer Res. 37(5):858–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones CI, Tonetti C (2020) Nonrivalry and the economics of data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2819–2858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Junglas IA, Johnson NA, Spitzmüller C (2008) Personality traits and concern for privacy: An empirical study in the context of location-based services. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 17(4):387–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koutroumpis P, Leiponen A, Thomas LDW (2020) Markets for data. Indust. Corporate Change 29(3):645–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laajaj R, Macours K, Pinzon Hernandez DA, Arias O, Gosling SD, Potter J, Rubio-Codina M, Vakis R (2019) Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-weird populations. Sci. Adv. 5(7):eaaw5226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laufer R, Wolfe M (1977) Privacy as a concept and a social issue: A multidimensional developmental theory. J. Soc. Issues 33(3):22–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Huang Z, Wu YJ, Wang Z (2019) Exploring how personality affects privacy control behavior on social networking sites. Frontiers Psych. 10(1771):1–9.Google Scholar
• Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1):13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin T (2022) Valuing intrinsic and instrumental preferences for privacy. Marketing Sci. 41(4):663–681.Link, Google Scholar
• List JA, Shogren JF (2002) Calibration of willingness-to-accept. J. Environ. Econom. Management 43(2):219–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matz SC, Kosinski M, Nave G, Stillwell DJ (2017) Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(48):12714–12719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, John OP (1992) The five-factor model: Issues and applications. J. Personality 60(2):175–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller AR, Tucker C (2018) Privacy protection, personalized medicine, and genetic testing. Management Sci. 64(10):4648–4668.Link, Google Scholar
• Morewedge CK, Monga A, Palmatier RW, Shu SB, Small DA (2021) Evolution of consumption: A psychological ownership framework. J. Marketing 85(1):196–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mun M, Hao S, Mishra N, Shilton K, Burke J, Estrin D, Hansen M, Govindan R (2010) Personal data vaults: A locus of control for personal data streams. Proc. 6th Internat. Conf. (Co-NEXT ’10) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–12.Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum H (2009) Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiekermann S, Korunovska J, Bauer C (2013) Psychology of ownership and asset defense: Why people value their personal information beyond privacy. Preprint, submitted January 22, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2148886.Google Scholar
• Sutanto J, Palme E, Tan CH (2013) Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox. MIS Quart. 37(4):1141–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomaino G, Wertenbroch K, Walters DJ (2023) Intransitivity of consumer preferences for privacy. J. Marketing Res. 60(3):489–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai JY, Egelman S, Cranor L, Acquisti A (2011) The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):254–268.Link, Google Scholar
• USAspending (2023) Recipient profile: Clearview AI, Inc. Accessed August 31, 2023, https://www.usaspending.gov/recipient/8cbe9b49-79af-44f4-3eb5-87296ee4a591-C/latest.Google Scholar
• Varian HR (1996) Economic aspects of personal privacy. Privacy and self-regulation in the information age. Lehr WH, Pupillo LM, eds. National Telecommunications and Information Administration Report. Reprinted in Internet Policy and Economics: Challenges and Perspectives (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Xu H, Teo HH, Tan BC, Agarwal R (2010) The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: The case of location-based services. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(3):135–174.Crossref, Google Scholar