Courteous or Crude? Managing User Conduct to Improve On-Demand Service Platform Performance

References

• Acemoglu D, Makhdoumi A, Malekian A, Ozdaglar A (2022) Learning from reviews: The selection effect and the speed of learning. Econometrica. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Adlakha S, Johari R (2013) Mean field equilibrium in dynamic games with strategic complementarities. Oper. Res. 61(4):971–989.Link, Google Scholar
• Afèche P, Liu Z, Maglaras C (2018) Ride-hailing networks with strategic drivers: The impact of platform control capabilities on performance. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Allen S (2015) The mysterious way Uber bans drivers. Accessed December 12, 2020, https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-mysterious-way-uber-bans-drivers.Google Scholar
• Allon G, Bassamboo A, Cil EB (2012) Large-scale service marketplaces: The role of the moderating firm. Manageent Sci. 58(10):1854–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Bai J, So KC, Tang CS, Chen X, Wang H (2019) Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform with impatient customers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):556–570.Link, Google Scholar
• Balseiro SR, Besbes O, Weintraub GY (2015) Repeated auctions with budgets in ad exchanges: Approximations and design. Management Sci. 61(4):864–884.Link, Google Scholar
• Balseiro SR, Brown DB, Chen C (2021) Dynamic pricing of relocating resources in large networks. Management Sci. 67(7):4075–4094.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Freund D, Lykouris T (2016a) Pricing and optimization in shared vehicle systems: An approximation framework. Preprint, submitted August 24, https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.06819.Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Johari R, Riquelme C (2016b) Dynamic pricing in ridesharing platforms. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 15(1):65–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Kanoria Y, Qian P (2018) State dependent control of closed queueing networks with application to ride-hailing. Preprint, submitted March 13, https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04959.Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Peitz M (2018) Inside the engine room of digital platforms: Reviews, ratings, and recommendations. Working Paper, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, Marseille, France.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Hu M (2020) Operations management in the age of the sharing economy: What is old and what is new? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):93–101.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Xiao S, Yang X (2020) Do workers and customers benefit from competition between on-demand service platforms? Preprint, submitted July 7, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3645882.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Ding J-Y, Kong G, Taylor T (2022) Labor welfare in on-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):110–124.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Jaillet P, Martin S (2019) Online vehicle routing: The edge of optimization in large-scale applications. Oper. Res. 67(1):143–162.Link, Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Castro F, Lobel I (2021a) Spatial capacity planning. Oper. Res., ePub ahead of Print May 17, https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2112.Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Castro F, Lobel I (2021b) Surge pricing and its spatial supply response. Management Sci. 67(3):1350–1367.Link, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Papanastasiou Y (2019) Inducing exploration in service platforms. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy: Making Supply Meet Demand, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 193–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Candogan O, Saban D (2019) Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Oper. Res. 67(3):744–769.Link, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Papanastasiou Y, Zhang W (2020a) Information provision in two-sided platforms: Optimizing for supply. Preprint, submitted June 20, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3617351.Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Elmaghraby WJ, Moon K, Zhang W (2020b) Managing market thickness in online business-to-business markets. Management Sci. 66(12):5783–5822.Link, Google Scholar
• Braverman A, Dai JG, Liu X, Ying L (2019) Empty-car routing in ridesharing systems. Oper. Res. 67(5):1437–1452.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Can you gig it? an empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Daniels KM, Lobel R (2017) The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
• Castillo JC, Knoepfle D, Weyl G (2017) Surge pricing solves the wild goose chase. EC’17 Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 241–242.Google Scholar
• Chen MK, Sheldon M (2016) Dynamic pricing in a labor market: Surge pricing and flexible work on the Uber platform. EC’16 Proc. 2016 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 455.Google Scholar
• Chen W, Tseng C-L, Yang S-JS (2019b) Improving hand hygiene process compliance through process monitoring in healthcare. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(4):669–682.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen MK, Rossi PE, Chevalier JA, Oehlsen E (2019a) The value of flexible work: Evidence from Uber drivers. J. Polit. Econom. 127(6):2735–2794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu LY, Wan Z, Zhan D (2018) Harnessing the double-edged sword via routing: Information provision on ride-hailing platforms. Preprint, submitted October 1, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3266250.Google Scholar
• Cohen M, Zhang RP (2017) Competition and coopetition for two-sided platforms. Preprint, submitted August 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3028138.Google Scholar
• Cohen M, Fiszer M-D, Kim BJ (2018) Frustration-based promotions: Field experiments in ride-sharing. Preprint, submitted February 25, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3129717.Google Scholar
• Cook J (2015) Uber’s internal charts show how its driver-rating system actually works. Accessed December 12, 2020, http://www.businessinsider.com/leaked-charts-show-how-ubers-driver-rating-system-works-2015-2.Google Scholar
• Cullen Z, Farronato C (2021) Outsourcing tasks online: Matching supply and demand on peer-to-peer Internet platforms. Management Sci. 67(7):3985–4003.Link, Google Scholar
• El-Azouzi R, De Pellegrini F, Sidi HBA, Kamble V (2013) Evolutionary forwarding games in delay tolerant networks: Equilibria, mechanism design and stochastic approximation. Comput. Netw. 57(4):1003–1018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng G, Kong G, Wang Z (2021) We are on the way: Analysis of on-demand ride-hailing systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(5):1237–1256.Link, Google Scholar
• Gong J, Greenwood BN, Song YA (2017) Uber might buy me a Mercedes Benz: An empirical investigation of the sharing economy and durable goods purchase. Preprint, submitted May 19, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2971072.Google Scholar
• Guda H, Subramanian U (2019) Your uber is arriving: Managing on-demand workers through surge pricing, forecast communication, and worker incentives. Management Sci. 65(5):1995–2014.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Guo P, Tang CS, Tang Y, Wang Y (2019) Gender-based operational issues arising from on-demand ride-hailing platforms: Safety concerns and system configuration. Preprint, submitted September 21, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3260427.Google Scholar
• Gurvich I, Ward A (2014) On the dynamic control of matching queues. Stochastic Systems 4(2):479–523.Link, Google Scholar
• Gurvich I, Lariviere M, Moreno A (2019) Operations in the on-demand economy: Staffing services with self-scheduling capacity. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy: Making Supply Meet Demand, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 249–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (2003) Evolutionary game dynamics. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 40(4):479–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Zhou Y (2019) Price, wage and fixed commission in on-demand matching. Preprint, submitted August 31, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2949513.Google Scholar
• Hu M, Zhou Y (2022) Dynamic type matching. Manufacturing & Service Oper. Management 24(1):125–142.Google Scholar
• Hu B, Hu M, Zhu H (2022) Surge pricing and two-sided temporal responses in ride-hailing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):91–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Ifrach B, Maglaras C, Scarsini M, Zseleva A (2019) Bayesian social learning from consumer reviews. Oper. Res. 67(5):1209–1221.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer K, Johari R, Sundararajan M (2014) Mean field equilibria of dynamic auctions with learning. Management Sci. 60(12):2949–2970.Link, Google Scholar
• Jacobs JA, Kolb AM, Taylor CR (2017) Optimal reputation systems for platforms. Working Paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Jin C, Hosanagar K, Veeraraghavan S (2018) Do ratings cut both ways? Impact of bilateral ratings on platforms. Working paper, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Johari R, Light B, Weintraub G (2019) Quality selection in two-sided markets: A constrained price discrimination approach. Preprint, submitted December 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02251.Google Scholar
• Kabra A, Belavina E, Girotra K (2016) Designing promotions to scale marketplaces. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Kanoria Y, Qian P (2019) Blind dynamic resource allocation in closed networks via mirror backpressure. Preprint, submitted March 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.02764.Google Scholar
• Kanoria Y, Saban D (2021) Facilitating the search for partners on matching platforms. Management Sci. 67(10):5990–6029.Link, Google Scholar
• Li J, Netessine S (2020) Higher market thickness reduces matching rate in online platforms: Evidence from a quasiexperiment. Management Sci. 66(1):271–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Lian Z, van Ryzin G (2020) Optimal growth in two-sided markets. Preprint, submitted Available at SSRN 3310559.Google Scholar
• Light B, Weintraub GY (2022) Mean field equilibrium: Uniqueness, existence, and comparative statics. Oper. Res. 70(1):585–605.Google Scholar
• Liu X, Cui Y, Chen L (2019) Bonus competition in the gig economy. Preprint, submitted January 16, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3310559.Google Scholar
• Luca M (2017) Designing online marketplaces: Trust and reputation mechanisms. Innovation Policy Econom. 17(1):77–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo Q, Saigal R (2017) Dynamic pricing for on-demand ride-sharing: A continuous approach. Preprint, submitted October 20, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3056498.Google Scholar
• Ma H, Fang F, Parkes DC (2018) Spatio-temporal pricing for ridesharing platforms. Preprint, submitted January 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.04015.Google Scholar
• Mashable (2020) Uber’s new driver features could mean more destination discrimination. Accessed December 12, 2020, https://mashable.com/article/uber-driver-california-changes-destination-discrimination/.Google Scholar
• Mayya R, Ye S, Viswanathan S, Agarwal R (2020) Who forgoes screening in online markets and when? Evidence from Airbnb. Preprint, submitted October 12, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3082018.Google Scholar
• Ming L, Tunca TI, Xu Y, Zhu W (2019) An empirical analysis of market formation, pricing, and revenue sharing in ride-hailing services. Preprint, submitted February 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3338088.Google Scholar
• Mostagir M (2010) Exploiting myopic learning. Saberi A, ed. WINE’10 Proc. 6th Internat. Workshop Internet Network Econom. (Springer, Berlin), 306–318.Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1989) Mechanism design. Eatwell J, Milgate M, Newman P, eds. Allocation, Information and Markets (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 191–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nikzad A (2017) Thickness and competition in ride-sharing markets. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Nowak MA (2006) Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özkan E, Ward AR (2020) Dynamic matching for real-time ride sharing. Stochastic Systems 10(1):29–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Proserpio D, Xu W, Zervas G (2018) You get what you give: Theory and evidence of reciprocity in the sharing economy. Quant. Marketing Econom. 16(4):371–407.Google Scholar
• Quora (2017) What is considered a good Uber rider rating? Accessed December 12, 2020, https://www.quora.com/What-is-considered-a-good-Uber-rider-rating.Google Scholar
• Reddit (2017) Uber drivers, do you not pick up passengers based on their rating? Accessed December 12, 2020, https://www.reddit.com/r/uber/comments/5r7fxe/uber_drivers_do_you_not_pick_up_passengers_based/.Google Scholar
• Rosenblat A, Levy KEC, Barocas S, Hwang T (2017) Discriminating tastes: Uber’s customer ratings as vehicles for workplace discrimination. Policy Internet 9(3):256–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakasegawa H (1977) An approximation formula lq≃α⋅ρ β/(1−ρ). Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 29(1):67–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandholm WH (2010) Local stability under evolutionary game dynamics. Theor. Econom. 5(1):27–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shnayder V, Frongillo R, Parkes DC (2016) Measuring performance of peer prediction mechanisms using replicator dynamics. Brewka G, ed. IJCAI’16 Proc. 25th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 2611–2617.Google Scholar
• Smith JM, Price GR (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246(5427):15–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tadelis S (2016) Reputation and feedback systems in online platform markets. Annu. Rev. Econom. 8:321–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor TA (2018) On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):704–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang HT (2020) Discussion of the competitive strategies of telecom operators and over-the-top service providers from the perspective of evolutionary game theory. Decision Analysis 17(3):260–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Yang J, Qi L (2017) A game-theoretic model for the role of reputation feedback systems in peer-to-peer commerce. Internat. J. Production Econom. 191:178–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang G, Zhang H, Zhang J (2019) On-demand ride-matching in a spatial model with abandonment and cancellation. Preprint, submitted July 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3414716.Google Scholar
• Weibull JW (1997) Evolutionary Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Weintraub GY, Benkard L, Van Roy B (2006) Oblivious equilibrium: A mean field approximation for large-scale dynamic games. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 18:1489–1496.Google Scholar
• Weyl EG (2010) A price theory of multi-sided platforms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1642–1672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu S, Xiao S, Benjaafar S (2020) Two-sided competition between on-demand service platforms. Preprint, submitted January 27, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3525971.Google Scholar
• Yang P, Iyer K, Frazier P (2018) Mean field equilibria for resource competition in spatial settings. Stochastic Systems 8(4):307–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Yu JJ, Tang CS, Shen Z-JM, Chen XM (2020) A balancing act of regulating on-demand ride services. Management Sci. 66(7):2975–2992.Link, Google Scholar