Overriding in Teams: The Role of Beliefs, Social Image, and Gender

References

• Alsan M, Garrick O, Graziani G (2019) Does diversity matter for health? Experimental evidence from Oakland. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(12):4071–4111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amanatullah ET, Morris MW (2010) Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(2):256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Bernheim B (2009) Social image and the 50-50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 77(5):1607–1636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Petrie R (2004) Public goods experiments without confidentiality: A glimpse into fundraising. J. Public Econom. 88(7-8):1605–1623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Petrie R (2008) Beauty, gender and stereotypes: Evidence from laboratory experiments. J. Econom. Psych. 29(1):73–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Rao J, Trachtman H (2017) Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. J. Political Econom. 125(3):625–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Laschever S (2003) Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Recalde MP, Vesterlund L, Weingart L (2017) Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(3):714–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M (2011) New perspectives on gender. Card D, Ashenfelter O, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, New York), 1543 –1590.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M (2018) Coase lecture—The glass ceiling. Economica 85(338):205–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biddle JE, Hamermesh DS (1998) Beauty, productivity, and discrimination: Lawyers’ looks and lucre. J. Labor Econom. 16(1):172–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2017) The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. J. Econom. Literature 55(3):789–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Frey B (1999) The sound of silence in prisoner’s dilemma and dictator games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 38(1):43–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Van Geen A, Bazerman M (2016) When performance trumps gender bias: Joint vs. separate evaluation. Management Sci. 62(5):1225–1234.Link, Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Imas A, Rosenberg M (2019) The dynamics of discrimination: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(10):3395–3436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2019) Beliefs about gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(3):739–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Born A, Ranehill E, Sandberg A (2020) Gender and willingness to lead: Does the gender composition of teams matter? Rev. Econom. Statist. 104(2):259–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brescoll VL (2011) Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(4):622–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burfurd I, Wilkening T (2018) Experimental guidance for eliciting beliefs with the Stochastic Becker–DeGroot–Marschak mechanism. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 4(1):15–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Jensen R (2017) Social image and economic behavior in the field: Identifying, understanding, and shaping social pressure. Annu. Rev. Econom. 9(1):131–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Fujiwara T, Pallais A (2017) ‘Acting wife’: Marriage market incentives and labor market investments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(11):3288–3319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Gerhards L, Van der Weele L (2018) Measuring responsiveness to feedback as a personal trait. J. Risk Uncertainty 56(2):65–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carli LL (1990) Gender, language, and influence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(5):941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter A, Croft A, Lukas D, Sandstrom G (2018) Women’s visibility in academic seminars: Women ask fewer questions than men. PLoS One 13(9):e0212146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Cobo-Reyes R, Meraglia S, Sánchez Á (2020) Anticipated discrimination, choices, and performance: Experimental evidence. Eur. Econom. Rev. 127:103473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Houser D (2019) When are women willing to lead? The effect of team gender composition and gendered tasks. Leadership Quart. 30(6):101340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman K, Flikkema CB, Shurchkov O (2021) Gender stereotypes in deliberation and team decisions. Games Econom. Behav. 129:329–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman KB (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1625–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman KB, Collis M, Kulkarni L (2019) Stereotypes and belief updating. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cooper LA, Roter DL, Johnson RL, Ford DE, Steinwachs DM, Powe NR (2003) Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Ann. Internal Medicine 139(11):907–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coutts A (2019) Good news and bad news are still news: Experimental evidence on belief updating. Experiment. Econom. 22(2):369–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosetto P, Filippin A (2016) A theoretical and experimental appraisal of four risk elicitation methods. Experiment. Econom. 19(3):613–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danz D, Vesterlund L, Wilson AJ (2020) Belief Elicitation: Limiting Truth Telling with Information on Incentives (No. w27327) (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellavigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Google Scholar
• Dellavigna S, List J, Malmendier U, Rao G (2016) Voting to tell others. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(1):143–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dupas P, Modestino AS, Niederle M, Wolfers J, The Seminar Dynamics Collective (2021) Gender and the Dynamics of Economics Seminars (No. w28494) (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Petrie R (2011) Face value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1497–1513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2008) Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Plott CR, Smith VL, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, vol. 1 (Elsevier) 1061–1073, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00113-8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertac S (2011) Does self-relevance affect information processing? Experimental evidence on the response to performance and non-performance feedback. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 80(3):532–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Kessler JB (2022) The gender gap in self-promotion. Quart. J. Econom. Forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjac003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filippin A, Crosetto P (2016) A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes. Management Sci. 62(11):3138–3160.Link, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funk P (2010) Social incentives and voter turnout: Evidence from the Swiss mail ballot system. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 8(5):1077–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gago A (2018) Confrontation costs in negotiations: Bargaining under the veil of a screen. Working paper, Universidad Tortcuato Di Tella, Argentina, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3716550.Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econ. Sci. Assoc. 1:114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grosskopf B, Pearce G (2020) Do you mind me paying less? Measuring other-regarding preferences in the market for taxis. Management Sci. 66(11):5059–5074.Link, Google Scholar
• He S, Offerman T, van de Ven J (2017) The sources of the communication gap. Management Sci. 63(9):2832–2846.Link, Google Scholar
• Hill A, Jones D, Woodworth L (2020) Physician-patient race-match reduces patient mortality. Working paper, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3211276.Google Scholar
• Hoffman E, McCabe K, Smith VL (1996) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):653–660.Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaksson S (2018) It takes two: Gender differences in group work. Working paper, https://www.dropbox.com/s/hafhh70p3li9tij/1120jmp.pdf?dl=0.Google Scholar
• Jacobi T, Schweers D (2017) Justice, interrupted: The effect of gender, ideology, and seniority at Supreme Court oral arguments. Virginia Law Rev. 103(7):1379–1485.Google Scholar
• Jones D, Linardi S (2014) Wallflowers: Experimental evidence of an aversion to standing out. Management Sci. 60(7):1757–1771.Link, Google Scholar
• Karni E (2009) A mechanism for eliciting probabilities. Econometrica 77(2):603–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krupka EL, Weber RA (2013) Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):495–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manian S, Sheth K (2021) Follow my lead: Assertive cheap talk and the gender gap. Management Sci. 67(11):6880–6896.Link, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobius MM, Niederle T, Niehaus P, Rosenblat TS (2022) Managing self-confidence: Theory and experimental evidence. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print March 24, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4294.Link, Google Scholar
• Mobius MM, Rosenblat TS (2006) Why beauty matters. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):222–235.Google Scholar
• Mujcic R, Frijters P (2021) The colour of a free ride. Econom. J. (London) 131(634):970–999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M (2016) Gender. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 481–562.Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Recalde MP, Vesterlund L (2022) Gender differences in negotiation and policy for equalizing outcomes. Karagözoğlu E, Hyndman KB, eds. (Bargaining, Palgrave Macmillan), 455–475, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-76666-5_21.Google Scholar
• Recalde MP, Riedl A, Vesterlund L (2018) Error-prone inference from response time: The case of intuitive generosity in public-good games. J. Public Econom. 160:132–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA (1998) Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(3):629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarsons H (2019) Interpreting signals in the labor market: Evidence from medical referrals. Working paper, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, https://drive.google.com/file/d/12LI5b4Xg7DlNWt-ml2qw-PaMHlihdl0V/view.Google Scholar
• Sarsons H, Gërxhani K, Reuben E, Schram A (2021) Gender differences in recognition for group work. J. Political Econom. 129(1):101–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scharlemann JP, Eckel CC, Kacelnik A, Wilson RK (2001) The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face. J. Econom. Psych. 22(5):617–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith-Lovin L, Brody C (1989) Interruptions in group discussions: The effects of gender and group composition. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 54(3):424–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder K (2014) Want to get ahead as a woman in tech? Language Log. Accessed October 22, 2019, https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=13513Google Scholar
• Wilson RK, Eckel CC (2006) Judging a book by its cover: Beauty and expectations in the trust game. Political Res. Quart. 59(2):189–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao E, Houser D (2005) Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 102(20):7398–7401.Crossref, Google Scholar