Uncovering Synergy and Dysergy in Consumer Reviews: A Machine Learning Approach
Published Online:27 May 2022https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4443
References
- (2018) Probabilistic topic model for hybrid recommender systems: A stochastic variational Bayesian approach. Marketing Sci. 37(6):987–1008.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Generalized random forests. Ann. Statist. (Institute of Mathematical Statistics), 47(2):1148–1178.Google Scholar
- (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 57(1):289–300.Google Scholar
- (2020) Uniting the tribes: Using text for marketing insight. J. Marketing 84(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.Google Scholar
- (2001) Random forests. Machine Learn. 45(1):5–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Constructing explainable opinion graphs from reviews. Leskovec J, Grobelnik M, Najork M, Tang J, Zia L, eds. Proc. Web Conference (ACM, New York), 3419–3431.Google Scholar
- (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Edu. Psych. Measures 20(1):37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects. Biometrika 96(1):187–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) How consumers’ media usage creates synergy in advertising campaigns. Internat. J. Marketing Res. 60(3):268–287.Google Scholar
- (2019) BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Burstein J, Doran C, Solorio T, eds. Proc. Conf. of the North Amer. Chapter of the Assoc. for Comput. Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1 (ACL, Stroudsburg, PA), 4171–4186.Google Scholar
- (2008) High dimensional classification using features annealed independence rules. Ann. Statist. 36(6):2605.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Innovated interaction screening for high-dimensional nonlinear classification. Ann. Statist. (Institute of Mathematical Statistics), 43(3):1243–1272.Google Scholar
- (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psych. Bull. 76(5):378.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. Internat. J. Inform. Management 35(2):137–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) An unsupervised neural attention model for aspect extraction. Barzilay R, Kan MY, eds. Proc. 55th Annual Meeting of the Assoc. for Comput. Linguistics, vol. 1 (ACL, Stroudsburg, PA), 388–397.Google Scholar
- (2017) Neural discourse structure for text categorization. Barzilay R, Kan MY, eds. Proc. 55th Annual Meeting of the Assoc. for Comput. Linguistics, vol. 1 (ACL, Stroudsburg, PA), 996–1005.Google Scholar
- (2016) Designed to succeed: Dimensions of product design and their impact on market share. J. Marketing 80(4):72–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (Elsevier), 34(1):22–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Unsupervised multilingual sentence boundary detection. Comput. Linguistics 32(4):485–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Top-down RST parsing utilizing granularity levels in documents. Proc. 34th AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI, Palo Alto, CA), 8099–8106.Google Scholar
- , Mausam, Chakrabarti S (2020) OpenIE6: Iterative grid labeling and coordination analysis for open information extraction. Webber B, Cohn T, He Y, Liu Y, eds. Proc. Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (ACL, Stroudsburg, PA), 3748–3761.Google Scholar
- (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Exact post-selection inference, with application to the lasso. Ann. Statist. (Institute of Mathematical Statistics), 44(3):907–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Subjective databases. Proceedings VLDB Endowment, 12(11):1330–1343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) A PDTB-styled end-to-end discourse parser. Natural Language Engrg. 20(2):151–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Decoupled weight decay regularization. Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. on Learning Representations (New Orleans, LA), 1–8.Google Scholar
- (1995) Wordnet: A lexical database for English. Comm. ACM 38(11):39–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) The asymmetric impact of negative and positive attribute-level performance on overall satisfaction and repurchase intentions. J. Marketing 62:33–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. J. Marketing Res. 40(4):375–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Mine your own business: Market-structure surveillance through text mining. Marketing Sci. 31(3):521–543.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) X-means: Extending k-means with efficient estimation of the number of clusters. Langley P, ed. Proc. 17th Internat Conf. on Machine Learn. (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco), 727–734.Google Scholar
- (2007) Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. Natural Language Processing and Text Mining (Springer, Berlin), 9–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-networks. Inui K, Jiang J, Ng V, Wan X, eds. Proc. Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th Internat. Joint Conf. on Natural Language Processing (ACL, Stroudsburg, PA), 3973–3983.Google Scholar
- (2010) Factorization machines. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. on Data Mining (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 995–1000.Google Scholar
- (1994) Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 89(427):846–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Root-n-consistent semiparametric regression. Econometrica: J. Econometric Soc. 56(4):931–954.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Reasoning about entailment with neural attention. Preprint, submitted September 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.06664.Google Scholar
- (2003) Semiparametric Regression (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Brand synergy effects in multiple brand extensions. J. Marketing Res. 44(4):663–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Statistical learning and selective inference. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 112(25):7629–7634.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Identifying customer needs from user-generated content. Marketing Sci. 38(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Targeted maximum likelihood learning. Internat. J. Biostatist. 2(1).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Attention is all you need. Luxburg UV, Guyon I, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, eds. Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 6000–6010.Google Scholar
- (2020) Two are better than one: Joint entity and relation extraction with table-sequence encoders. Webber B, Cohn T, He Y, Liu Y, eds. Proc. 2020 Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (ACL, Stroudsburg, PA), 1706–1721.Google Scholar
- (2010) Propensity score estimation: Neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (cart), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression. J. Clinical Epidemiology 63(8):826–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Grid tagging scheme for aspect-oriented fine-grained opinion extraction. Cohn T, He Y, Liu Y, eds. Proc. 2020 Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (ACL, Stroudsburg, PA), 2576–2585.Google Scholar
- (2019) Sensitivity analysis for inverse probability weighting estimators via the percentile bootstrap. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Statist. Methodology 81(4):735–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Selective inference for effect modification via the lasso. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Statist. Methodology 84(2):382–413.Crossref, Google Scholar

