Fending Off Critics of Platform Power with Differential Revenue Sharing: Doing Well by Doing Good?

References

• Balseiro S, Lin M, Mirrokni V, Leme RP, Zuo S (2017) Dynamic revenue sharing. Preprint, submitted, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2956715.Google Scholar
• Bart N, Chernonog T, Avinadav T (2020) Revenue-sharing contracts in supply chains: A comprehensive literature review. Internat. J. Production Res. 59(21):6633–6658.Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK (2021) Bundling for flexibility and variety: An economic model for multiproducer value aggregation. Management Sci. 67(4):2365–2380.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK (2022) The creator economy: Managing ecosystem supply, revenue-sharing, and platform design. Management Sci. 68(7):4755–5555.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK, Choudhary V (2004) Economics of an information intermediary with aggregation benefits. Inform. Systems Res. 15(1):22–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Cusumano MA, Yoffie DB, Gawer A (2019) The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power (HarperCollins Publishers).Google Scholar
• Haviv A, Huang Y, Li N (2020) Intertemporal demand spillover effects on video game platforms. Management Sci. 66(10):4788–4807.Link, Google Scholar
• MacDonald G, Ryall MD (2004) How do value creation and competition determine whether a firm appropriates value? Management Sci. 50(10):1319–1333.Link, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Riley J (1984) Monopoly with incomplete information. RAND J. Econom. 15(2):171–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh J, Koh B, Raghunathan S (2015) Value appropriation between the platform provider and app developers in mobile platform mediated networks. J. Inform. Tech. Impact 30(3):245–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oren SS, Smith SA, Wilson RA (1982) Nonlinear pricing in markets with interdependent demand. Marketing Sci. 1(3):287–313.Link, Google Scholar