Nudging Green-but-Slow Shipping Choices in Online Retail

References

• Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vlek C, Rothengatter T (2005) A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. Environ. Psych. 25(3):273–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agatz N, Fan Y, Stam D (2021) The impact of green labels on time slot choice and operational sustainability. Production Oper. Management 30(7):2285–2303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Villamor I, Ramani RS (2021) MTurk research: Review and recommendations. J. Management 47(4):823–837.Google Scholar
• Amorim P, DeHoratius N, Eng-Larsson F, Martins S (2024) Customer preferences for delivery service attributes in attended home delivery. Management Sci. 70(11):7559–7578.Link, Google Scholar
• Bansal S, Muthulingam S (2022) Can precise numbers boost energy efficiency? Production Oper. Management 31(8):3264–3287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borin N, Cerf DC, Krishnan R (2011) Consumer effects of environmental impact in product labeling. J. Consumer Marketing 28(1):76–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchholz K (2024) The products growing online sales fastest. Statista (March 15), https://www.statista.com/chart/22693/share-of-online-sales-per-product-category/.Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Kalkanci B (2021) How transparency into internal and external responsibility initiatives influences consumer choice. Management Sci. 67(2):932–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Norton MI (2011) The labor illusion: How operational transparency increases perceived value. Management Sci. 57(9):1564–1579.Link, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Kim T, Tsay CJ (2017) Creating reciprocal value through operational transparency. Management Sci. 63(6):1673–1695.Link, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Mariadassou S, Zheng Y (2019) Relative performance transparency: Effects on sustainable choices. Preprint, submitted January 29, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3324306.Google Scholar
• Bull J (2012) Loads of green washing—Can behavioural economics increase willingness-to-pay for efficient washing machines in the UK? Energy Policy 50:242–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byerly H, Balmford A, Ferraro PJ, Wagner CH, Palchak E, Polasky S, Ricketts TH, Schwartz AJ, Fisher B (2018) Nudging pro‐environmental behavior: Evidence and opportunities. Frontiers Ecology Environ. 16(3):159–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP (2014) Retail store density and the cost of greenhouse gas emissions. Management Sci. 60(8):1907–1925.Link, Google Scholar
• Chernev A, Blair S (2015) Doing well by doing good: The benevolent halo of corporate social responsibility. J. Consumer Res. 41(6):1412–1425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleveland M, Kalamas M, Laroche M (2005) Shades of green: Linking environmental locus of control and pro‐environmental behaviors. J. Consumer Marketing 22(4):198–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Copeland MT (1924) Principles of Merchandising (AW Shaw Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Cui R, Li M, Li Q (2020) Value of high-quality logistics: Evidence from a clash between SF Express and Alibaba. Management Sci. 66(9):3879–3902.Link, Google Scholar
• Day M (2020) Amazon nixed green shipping proposal to avoid annoying shoppers. Bloomberg Law (March 5), https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-and-energy/amazon-nixed-green-shipping-proposal-to-avoid-annoying-shoppers.Google Scholar
• Deci EL (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 18(1):105–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmas MA, Fischlein M, Asensio OI (2013) Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy 61:729–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deshpande V, Pendem PK (2022) Logistics performance, ratings, and its impact on customer purchasing behavior and sales in e-commerce platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(3):827–845.Link, Google Scholar
• Diamond WD, Loewy BZ (1991) Effects of probabilistic rewards on recycling attitudes and behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 21(19):1590–1607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding M, Grewal R, Liechty J (2005) Incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):67–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD (2014) The “new environmental paradigm.” J. Environ. Ed. 9(4):10–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Escalas JE, Luce MF (2004) Understanding the effects of process-focused versus outcome-focused thought in response to advertising. J. Consumer Res. 31(2):274–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher ML, Gallino S, Xu JJ (2019) The value of rapid delivery in omnichannel retailing. J. Marketing Res. 56(5):732–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Gallino S, Moreno A, Rooderkerk RP (2019) Omnichannel fulfillment dilemmas: Customer preferences and manager perceptions. Preprint, submitted June 26, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3399664.Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Tavoni M (2024) Forget-me-not: The persistent effect of information provision for adopting climate-friendly goods. Management Sci. 70(7):4480–4501.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consumer Res. 35(3):472–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herrington D (2024) Amazon’s Prime delivery speeds are faster than ever so far in 2024. Amazon News (April 29), https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/retail/amazon-prime-delivery-speeds-2024.Google Scholar
• Hunt NC, Scheetz AM (2018) Using MTurk to distribute a survey or experiment: Methodological considerations. J. Inform. Systems 33(1):43–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IBM (2020) Meet the 2020 consumers driving change. Accessed June 24, 2025, https://nrf.com/research/meet-2020-consumers-driving-change.Google Scholar
• Ignat B, Chankov S (2020) Do e-commerce customers change their preferred last-mile delivery based on its sustainability impact? Internat. J. Logist. Management 31(3):521–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai K, Yamamoto T (2013) Identification and sensitivity analysis for multiple causal mechanisms: Revisiting evidence from framing experiments. Political Anal. 21(2):141–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai K, Keele L, Yamamoto T (2010) Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statist. Sci. 25(1):51–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaller M, Pahwa A (2020) Evaluating the environmental impacts of online shopping: A behavioral and transportation approach. Transportation Res. Part D: Transport Environment 80:102223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang LA, Yang Z, Jun M (2013) Measuring consumer perceptions of online shopping convenience. J. Service Management 24(2):191–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E (2018) Designing and conducting laboratory experiments. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations, vol. 1 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Valdés L, Zheng Y (2018) Supply chain visibility and social responsibility: Investigating consumers’ behaviors and motives. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):617–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Lachowicz MJ, Preacher KJ, Kelley K (2018) A novel measure of effect size for mediation analysis. Psych. Methods 23(2):244–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YS, Seo YW, Siemsen E (2018) Running behavioral operations experiments using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Production Oper. Management 27(5):973–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim SFWT, Gao F, Tan TF (2024) Channel changes choice: An empirical study about omnichannel demand sensitivity to fulfillment lead time. Management Sci. 70(5):2954–2975.Link, Google Scholar
• Muthulingam S, Corbett CJ, Benartzi S, Oppenheim B (2013) Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):596–615.Link, Google Scholar
• Newman A, Bavik YL, Mount M, Shao B (2021) Data collection via online platforms: Challenges and recommendations for future research. Appl. Psych. 70(3):1380–1402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nguyen TQ, Schmid I, Stuart EA (2021) Clarifying causal mediation analysis for the applied researcher: Defining effects based on what we want to learn. Psych. Methods 26(2):255–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson EL (2013) It’s not easy being green: The effects of attribute trade-offs on green product preference and choice. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 41(2):171–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Marketing 49(4):41–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PR Newswire (2018) B2C Europe report shows that 75% of consumers would wait for delivery if it reduced environmental impact. PR Newswire (August 22), https://www.prnewswire.com/nl/persberichten/b2c-europe-report-shows-that-75-of-consumers-would-wait-for-delivery-if-it-reduced-environmental-impact-691431021.html.Google Scholar
• Qi W, Li L, Liu S, Shen ZJM (2018) Shared mobility for last-mile delivery: Design, operational prescriptions, and environmental impact. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):737–751.Link, Google Scholar
• Rai HB, Broekaert C, Verlinde S, Macharis C (2021) Sharing is caring: How non-financial incentives drive sustainable e-commerce delivery. Transportation Res. Part D: Transport Environment 93:102794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Retail Industry Leaders Association (2021) Retail speaks: Seven imperatives for the industry. Accessed January 29, 2026, https://www.rila.org/leading-retail-insights/retail-insights/retail-speaks-report.Google Scholar
• Roels G, Su X (2014) Optimal design of social comparison effects: Setting reference groups and reference points. Management Sci. 60(3):606–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Sheffi Y (2018) Balancing Green: When to Embrace Sustainability in a Business (and When Not To) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• SimanTov-Nachlieli I, Bamberger P (2021) Pay communication, justice, and affect: The asymmetric effects of process and outcome pay transparency on counterproductive workplace behavior. J. Appl. Psych 106(2):230–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thirumalai S, Sinha KK (2005) Customer satisfaction with order fulfillment in retail supply chains: Implications of product type in electronic B2C transactions. J. Oper. Management 23(3–4):291–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas RW, Murfield MLU, Ellram LM (2022) Leveraging sustainable supply chain information to alter last-mile delivery consumption: A social exchange perspective. Sustainable Production Consumption 34:285–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thøgersen J (2003) Monetary incentives and recycling: Behavioural and psychological reactions to a performance-dependent garbage fee. J. Consumer Policy 26(2):197–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2025) Quarterly retail e-commerce sales 4th quarter 2024. Accessed January 29, 2026, https://www.census.gov/retail/ecommerce/historic_releases.html.Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2019) SmartWay shipper company partner tool: Technical documentation. Accessed January 29, 2026, https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100XM87.txt.Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2024) Greenhouse gas equivalencies calculator. Accessed June 24, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator.Google Scholar
• Van Loon P, Deketele L, Dewaele J, McKinnon A, Rutherford C (2015) A comparative analysis of carbon emissions from online retailing of fast moving consumer goods. J. Cleaner Production 106:478–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Velazquez Martinez J, Rajagopalan S, Fransoo JC, Valenzuela-Ocana K (2024) The effect of framing the environmental impact of fast shipping on nudging consumers to opt for slow home deliveries: Evidence from the field. Preprint, submitted September 25, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4936719.Google Scholar
• Wagner L, Calvo E, Amorim P (2023) Better together! The consumer implications of delivery consolidation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(3):903–920.Link, Google Scholar
• Wei L, Kapuscinski R, Jasin S (2021) Shipping consolidation across two warehouses with delivery deadline and expedited options for e-commerce and omni-channel retailers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(6):1634–1650.Link, Google Scholar
• White K, Habib R, Hardisty DJ (2019) How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. J. Marketing 83(3):22–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White K, Macdonnell R, Dahl DW (2011) It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):472–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW (2009) Means vs. ends: Implications of process and outcome focus for team adaptation and performance. Organ. Sci. 20(3):500–515.Link, Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum (2020) The future of the last-mile ecosystem. World Economic Forum, Geneva.Google Scholar