Retailer-Led Marketplaces
References
- (2024) The Impact of “retail media” on online marketplaces: Insights from a field experiment. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print May 15, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0188.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Hybrid platform model: Monopolistic competition and a dominant firm. RAND J. Econom. 55(4):684–718.Google Scholar
- (2012) Search, design, and market structure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):1140–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Managing competition on a two-sided platform. Econom. Management Strategy 28(1):5–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Business model evaluation. Quantifying Walmart’s sources of advantage. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 9(1):12–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Are online and offline prices similar? Evidence from large multi-channel retailers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(1):283–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Chen N, Tsai H-T (2024) Steering via algorithmic recommendations. RAND J. Econom. 55(4):501–518.Google Scholar
- (2019) A model of biased intermediation. RAND J. Econom. 50(4):854–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Product selection in online marketplaces. Econom. Management Strategy 30(3):614–637.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Hybrid marketplaces with free entry of sellers. Rev. Indust. Organ. 62:119–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Unit vs. ad valorem taxes under revenue maximization. Working paper, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.Google Scholar
- Gomes R, Andrea M (2024) Regulating platform fees under price parity. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. jvae014.Google Scholar
- (2022) Should platforms be allowed to sell on their own marketplaces? RAND J. Econom. 53(2):297–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Competing by restricting choice: The case of matching platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Recommended for you: The effect of word of mouth on sales concentration. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 32(2):207–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Price competition with a stake in your rival. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 84:102862.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Store within a store. J. Marketing Res. 47:748–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Firm strategies in the “mid tail” of platform-based retailing. Marketing Sci. 30(5):757–775.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) The agency model and MFN clauses. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84:1151–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Segmentation versus agglomeration: Competition between platforms with competitive sellers. J. Political Econom. 128(6):2329–2374.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) In-store advertising by competitors. Marketing Sci. 36(3):402–425.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Entry into two-sided markets shaped by platform-guided search. Working paper, National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School, Singapore.Google Scholar
- (2016) The optimal scope of the royalty base in patent licensing. J. Law Econom. 59(1):45–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Digital monopolies: Privacy protection or price regulation? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 71:102623.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Designing an online retail marketplace: Leveraging information from sponsored advertising. Marketing Sci. 41(1):115–138.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Steering in one click: Platform self-preferencing in the Amazon Buy Box. Working paper, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2023) Private labels in marketplaces. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 89:102949.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1953) Ad valorem and unit taxes compared. Quart. J. Econom. 67(4):598–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Ad-valorem platform fees, indirect taxes and efficient price discrimination. RAND J. Econom. 48(2):467–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Targeted search and the long tail effect. RAND J. Econom. 44(4):733–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Advertising as information for ranking e-commerce search listings. Marketing Sci. 43(2):360–377.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Platform encroachment and own-content bias. J. Indust. Econom. 70(3):684–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com. Strategic Management J. 39:2618–2642.Crossref, Google Scholar

