To Ask or Not to Ask: The Effects of Broadly and Narrowly Adopted Peer-Recognition Systems on Help Seeking

References

• Ashford SJ, Northcraft GB (1992) Conveying more (or less) than we realize: The role of impression-management in feedback-seeking. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 53(3):310–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamberger P (2009) Employee help-seeking: Antecedents, consequences and new insights for future research. Res. Personnel Human Resources Management 28:49–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamberger P, Biron M (2007) Group norms and excessive absenteeism: The role of peer referent others. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(2):179–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth J (2024) How tech can “democratize” employee rewards and recognition. Human Resource Executive (January 25), https://hrexecutive.com/how-tech-can-democratize-employee-rewards-and-recognition/.Google Scholar
• Bayer JK, Peay MY (1997) Predicting intentions to seek help from professional mental health services. Australian New Zealand J. Psychiatry 31(4):504–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black PW (2023) The effect of peer-to-peer-recognition systems on helping behavior: The influence of rewards and group affiliation. Accounting Organ. Soc. 109:101454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black PW, Newman AH, Stikeleather BR, Waddoups NJ (2019) Performance feedback type and employees’ subsequent willingness to help other employees. J. Management Accounting Res. 31(3):25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolla D (2017) What gets recognized gets repeated. HRO Today (August 17), https://www.hrotoday.com/news/engaged-workforce/recognition-rewards/gets-recognized-gets-repeated/.Google Scholar
• Bradler C, Dur R, Neckermann S, Non A (2016) Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3085–3099.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandon Hall Group (2020) The business impact of inclusive and frequent recognition. Accessed January 6, 2025, https://www.achievers.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/The-Business-Impact-of-Inclusive-and-Frequent-Recognition-2020.pdf.Google Scholar
• Brown J, Sprinkle GB, Way D (2022) The effects of multi-level group identification on intergroup helping behavior. J. Management Accounting Res. 34(1):97–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke J (2022) The role of social bonds in understanding the pre- and post-recognition effects of recognition visibility. Accounting Rev. 97(5):119–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke J, Hecht G, Stern M (2023) The effects of anticipation and recognition source in employee recognition programs. Working paper, Indiana University, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, DePaul University.Google Scholar
• Burke RJ, Weir T, Duncan G (1976) Informal helping relationship in work organizations. Acad. Management J. 19(3):370–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen CX, Nichol JE, Zhou FH (2017) The effect of incentive framing and descriptive norms on internal whistleblowing. Contemporary Accounting Res. 34(4):1757–1778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen K, Chen G, Wu Q, Liu W, Zhao H (2023) Help-seeking at work: An integrative review, organizing framework and agenda for future research. Nankai Bus. Rev. Internat. 15(2):351–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB (2001) Influence: Science and Practice (Allyn & Bacon, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(6):1015–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalziel S (2023) 7 benefits of a peer to peer recognition program—And how to do it right. LinkedIn (July 24), https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/7-benefits-peer-recognition-program-how-do-right-guusto-gifts-inc.Google Scholar
• De Clercq D, Shu C, Gu M (2023) Overcoming organizational politics with tenacity and passion for work: Benefits for helping behaviors. Personnel Rev. 52(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans J, Presslee A, Vandenberg A (2023) Peer-to-peer recognition leaderboards and employee helping behavior. Working paper, University of Pittsburgh and University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
• Gorman C (2014) Peer recognition, culture and going the extra mile. Great Place to Work (November 19), https://www.greatplacetowork.com/resources/blog/peer-recognition-culture-and-going-the-extra-mile.Google Scholar
• Gribben V, Bogetz A, Bachrach L, Blankenburg R (2019) The golden ticket project for peer recognition. Clinical Teacher 16(3):203–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grodal S, Nelson AJ, Siino RM (2015) Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work. Acad. Management J. 58(1):136–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck K, Van den Abbeele A, Williamson MG (2021) Building trust through knowledge sharing: Implications for incentive system design. Accounting Organ. Soc. 93:101241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hara K, Adams A, Milland K, Savage S, Callison-Burch C, Bigham JP (2018) A data-driven analysis of workers’ earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proc. 2018 CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–14.Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Harvey MD, Enzle ME (1981) A cognitive model of social norms for understanding the transgression–helping effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 41(5):866–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes FH (2022) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 3rd ed. (The Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Insight Partners (2021) Social employee recognition system market forecast. Accessed January 6, 2025, https://www.theinsightpartners.com/reports/social-employee-recognition-systems-market.Google Scholar
• Jollineau SJ, Bowen RM (2023) A practical guide to using path analysis: Mediation and moderation in accounting research. J. Financial Reporting 8(1):11–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallgren CA, Reno RR, Cialdini RB (2000) A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 26(8):1002–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laws L (2024) The value of peer to peer recognition. Awardco Corporate Blog (March 1), https://www.award.co/blog/peer-to-peer-recognition.Google Scholar
• Lee F (1997) When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 72(3):336–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee F (2002) The social costs of seeking help. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 38(1):17–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee HW, Bradburn J, Johnson RE, Lin SHJ, Chang CHD (2019) The benefits of receiving gratitude for helpers: A daily investigation of proactive and reactive helping at work. J. Appl. Psych. 104(2):197–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Libby R, Bloomfield R, Nelson MW (2002) Experimental research in financial accounting. Accounting Organ. Soc. 27(8):775–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim JH, Tai K, Bamberger P, Morrison EW (2020) Soliciting resources from others: An integrative review. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):122–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinsey & Company (2022) Americans are embracing flexible work—And they want more of it (June 23), https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/real-estate/our-insights/americans-are-embracing-flexible-work-and-they-want-more-of-it.Google Scholar
• Nadler A (1991) Help-seeking behavior: Psychological costs and instrumental benefits. Clark MS, ed. Prosocial Behavior (Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury, CA), 290–311.Google Scholar
• Nadler A, Ellis S, Bar I (2003) To seek or not to seek: The relationship between help seeking and job performance evaluations as moderated by task-relevant expertise. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 33(1):91–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng KY, Van Dyne L (2005) Antecedents and performance consequences of helping behavior in work groups: A multilevel analysis. Group Organ. Management 30(5):514–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ojaokomo N (2024) Peer-to-peer recognition: 9 curated examples and ideas for 2024. Nectarhr (October 22), https://nectarhr.com/blog/peer-to-peer-recognition-examples-and-ideas.Google Scholar
• Palmer K, Blake D (2018) How to help your employees learn from each other. Harvard Bus. Rev. 1–6.Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB (1997) Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human Performance 10(2):133–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP, Whiting SW, Podsakoff PM, Blume BD (2009) Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 94(1):122–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reychav I, Weisberg J (2009) Good for workers, good for companies: How knowledge sharing benefits individual employees. Knowledge Process Management 16(4):186–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rimal RN, Real K (2003) Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Comm. Theory 13(2):184–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rimal RN, Lapinski MK, Cook RJ, Real K (2005) Moving toward a theory of normative influences: How perceived benefits and similarity moderate the impact of descriptive norms on behaviors. J. Health Comm. 10(5):433–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shanock LR, Roch SG, Mishra V (2012) Why we should care about exchange relationships with coworkers as well as supervisors: Both fellow employees and the organization benefit. TPM Testing Psychometrics Methodology Appl. Psych. 19(4):291–310.Google Scholar
• Simons HW, Berkowitz NN, Moyer RJ (1970) Similarity, credibility, and attitude change: A review and a theory. Psych. Bull. 73(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JR, Louis WR (2008) Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude-behaviour relationship. British J. Soc. Psych. 47(4):647–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JR, Terry DJ (2003) Attitude‐behaviour consistency: The role of group norms, attitude accessibility, and mode of behavioural decision‐making. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 33(5):591–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stouten J, Liden RC (2020) Social loafing in organizational work groups: The mitigating effect of servant leadership. Karau SJ, ed. Individual Motivation Within Groups: Social Loafing and Motivation Gains in Work, Academic, and Sports Teams (Elsevier Inc., London), 55–80.Google Scholar
• Terry DJ, Hogg MA, McKimmie BM (2000) Attitude‐behaviour relations: The role of in‐group norms and mode of behavioural decision‐making. British J. Soc. Psych. 39(3):337–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas KA, Clifford S (2017) Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments. Comput. Human Behav. 77:184–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, Cummings LL, McLean Parks J (1995) Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (A bridge over muddied waters). Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 17 (JAI, Greenwich, CT), 215–285.Google Scholar
• Voermans E, Cools M, Van den Abbeele A (2022) “Let me recognize you for your advice”: How peer recognition designs impact peer advice seeking. Working paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam, KU Leuven.Google Scholar
• Vogel DL, Wester SR, Wei M, Boysen GA (2005) The role of outcome expectations and attitudes on decisions to seek professional help. J. Counseling Psych. 52(4):459–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vranjes T (2014) Employers embrace peer-to-peer recognition. Society for Human Resource Management Online HR Magazine (October 23), https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/pages/1114-peer-recognition.aspx.Google Scholar
• Wang LW (2017) Recognizing the best: The productive and counterproductive effects of relative performance recognition. Contemporary Accounting Res. 34(2):966–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Noe RA (2010) Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resources Management Rev. 20(2):115–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson A (2019) 10 benefits of peer-to-peer recognition. Medium (November 8), https://medium.com/@workstars.awilson/10-benefits-of-peer-to-peer-recognition-33f57353c7e3.Google Scholar
• Wilson M (2024) The benefits of peer-to-peer recognition in the workplace. Bucketlist Rewards Blog (May 24), https://bucketlistrewards.com/blog/benefits-of-peer-to-peer-recognition/#:∼:text=Collaboration%20and%20teamwork%20are%20key,knowledge%2C%20and%20support%20one%20another.Google Scholar
• Wired (2004) Hubble Space Telescope: 1990–2007. Wired (February 11), https://www.wired.com/2004/02/hubble-space-telescope-1990-2007/.Google Scholar
• Wong K (2023) 12 best practices for peer-to-peer recognition. Achievers Recognition and Rewards (August 12), https://www.achievers.com/blog/peer-to-peer-recognition/.Google Scholar