When Rivalry Backfires: How Individual Skill and Risk of Status Loss Moderate the Effects of Rivalry on Performance

References

• Anderson C, Hildreth JAD, Howland L (2015) Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psych. Bull. 141(3):574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Appleyard MM, Brown C (2001) Employment practices and semiconductor manufacturing performance. Industry Relations 40(3):436–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balietti S, Riedl C (2021) Incentives, competition, and inequality in markets for creative production. Res. Policy 50(4):104212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1996) Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(3):404–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2020) Evaluative spillovers from technological change: The effects of “DNA envy” on occupational practices in forensic science. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):606–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berendt J, Uhrich S, Borah A, Kilduff GJ (2024) The rivalry reference effect: Referencing rival (vs. nonrival) competitors in public brand messages increases consumer engagement. J. Marketing Res. 61(6):1058–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Pope D (2011) Can losing lead to winning? Management Sci. 57(5):817–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Bianco AT, Higgins ET, Klem A (2003) How “fun/importance” fit affects performance: Relating implicit theories to instructions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(9):1091–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kang JH, Stuart TE (2007) Competitive crowding and risk taking in a tournament: Evidence from NASCAR racing. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2):208–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR, Menietti M (2016) Performance responses to competition across skill levels in rank‐order tournaments: Field evidence and implications for tournament design. RAND J. Econom. 47(1):140–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K, Helfat CE, Lakhani KR, Menietti ME (2012) Field evidence on individual behavior & performance in rank-order tournaments. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 13-016, Harvard Business School, London.Google Scholar
• Bramoullé Y, Djebbari H, Fortin B (2020) Peer effects in networks: A survey. Annu. Rev. Econom. 12(2020):603–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brock WA, Durlauf SN (2001) Interactions-based models. Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 5 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 3297–3380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J (2011) Quitters never win: The (adverse) incentive effects of competing with superstars. J. Political Econom. 119(5):982–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryant P (2009) Self-regulation and moral awareness among entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing 24(5):505–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Compensation and peer effects in competing sales teams. Management Sci. 60(8):1965–1984.Link, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Tihanyi L, Crook TR, Gangloff KA (2014) Tournament theory: Thirty years of contests and competitions. J. Management 40(1):16–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Converse BA, Reinhard DA (2016) On rivalry and goal pursuit: Shared competitive history, legacy concerns, and strategy selection. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 110(2):191–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowe E, Higgins ET (1997) Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 69(2):117–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Betley G, Kahle J, Abrams L, Porac J (1981) When trying to win- competition and intrinsic motivation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 7(1):79–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Larkin I (2015) Social comparisons and deception across workplace hierarchies: Field and experimental evidence. Organ. Sci. 26(1):78–98.Link, Google Scholar
• Fang D, Noe T, Strack P (2020) Turning up the heat: The discouraging effect of competition in contests. J. Political Econom. 128(5):1940–1975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris DL, Rosen CC, Johnson RE, Brown DJ, Risavy S, Heller D (2011) Approach or avoidance (or both?): Integrating core self-evaluations within an approach/avoidance framework. Personnel Psych. 64(1):137–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Amanatullah ET (2012) Psyched up or psyched out? The influence of co-actor status on individual performance. Organ. Sci. 23(2):402–415.Link, Google Scholar
• Förster J, Higgins ET, Bianco AT (2003) Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 90(1):148–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Förster J, Higgins ET, Idson LC (1998) Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the “goal looms larger” effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(5):1115–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freitas AL, Liberman N, Higgins ET (2002) Regulatory fit and resisting temptation during goal pursuit. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38(3):291–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fullerton RL, McAfee RP (1999) Auctioning entry into tournaments. J. Political Econom. 107(3):573–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gargiulo M, Ertug G, Galunic C (2009) The two faces of control: Network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2):299–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia SM, Tor A, Gonzalez R (2006) Ranks and rivals: A theory of competition. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(7):970–982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia SM, Tor A, Schiff TM (2013) The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives Psych. Sci. 8(6):634–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner HK (2012) Performance pressure as a double-edged sword: Enhancing team motivation but undermining the use of team knowledge. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanushek EA, Kain JF, Markman JM, Rivkin SG (2003) Does peer ability affect student achievement? J. Appl. Econometrics 18(5):527–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hays NA, Bendersky C (2015) Not all inequality is created equal: Effects of status versus power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 108(6):867–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (1997) Beyond pleasure and pain. Amer. Psych. 52(12):1280–1300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (2000) Making a good decision: Value from fit. Amer. Psychologist 55(11):1217–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (2005) Value from regulatory fit. Curr. Directives Psych. Sci. 14(4):209–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET, Idson LC, Freitas AL, Spiegel S, Molden DC (2003) Transfer of value from fit. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(6):1140–1153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ioannides Y (2013) From Neighborhoods to Nations: The Economics of Social Interactions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Johnson DW, Johnson RT (2005) New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetics Soc. General Psych. Monographs 131(4):285–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanfer R, Frese M, Johnson RE (2017) Motivation related to work: A century of progress. J. Appl. Psych. 102(3):338–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Chen EL (2008) Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):593–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ (2014) Driven to win: Rivalry, motivation, and performance. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 5(8):944–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ (2019) Interfirm relational rivalry: Implications for competitive strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 44(4):775–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD (2017) The spark that ignites: Mere exposure to rivals increases Machiavellianism and unethical behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 69(2017):156–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Elfenbein HA, Staw BM (2010) The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Acad. Management J. 53(5):943–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Gallo E, Reade JJ (2016) Whatever it takes: Rivalry and unethical behavior. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1508–1534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konrad KA (2009) Strategy and Dynamics in Contests (OUP Catalogue, Oxford).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Garvin DA, Lonstein E (2010) Topcoder (a): Developing software through crowdsourcing. Harvard Business School General Management Unit Case No. 610-032. Preprint, submitted January 15, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2002884.Google Scholar
• Lanaj K, Chang C-H, Johnson RE (2012) Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 138(5):998–1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2000) The power of incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2):410–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee DS, Lemieux T (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. J. Econom. Literature 48(2):281–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lount RB Jr, Pettit NC, Doyle SP (2017) Motivating underdogs and favorites. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 141(2017):82–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Ann. Management Rev. 2(1):351–398.Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maoret M, Marchesini G, Ertug G (2023) On the status shocks of tournament rituals: How ritual enactment affects productivity, input provision, and performance. AMJ. 66(3):926–952. Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGregor I, Gailliot MT, Vasquez NA, Nash KA (2007) Ideological and personal zeal reactions to threat among people with high self-esteem: Motivated promotion focus. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33(11):1587–1599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon T, Thompson L, Choi HS (2006) Tainted knowledge vs. tempting knowledge: People avoid knowledge from internal rivals and seek knowledge from external rivals. Management Sci. 52(8):1129–1144.Link, Google Scholar
• Moffitt R (2001) Policy interventions, low-level equilibria, and social interactions. Durlauf S, Young P, eds. Social Dynamics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A, Shi X (2007) Contests for status. J. Political Econom. 115(2):338–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Operti E, Lampronti Y, Sgourev SV (2020) Hold your horses: Temporal multiplexity and conflict moderation in the Palio di Siena (1743–2010). Organ. Sci. 31(1):85–102.Link, Google Scholar
• Pettit NC, Yong K, Spataro SE (2010) Holding your place: Reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(2):396–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettit NC, Doyle SP, Lount RB Jr, To C (2016) Cheating to get ahead or to avoid falling behind? The effect of potential negative versus positive status change on unethical behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 137(2016):172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Lee W, Haynes R, Bothner MS (2018) Escalation of competition into conflict in competitive networks of formula one drivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(15):3361–3367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pike BE, Kilduff G, Galinsky AD (2018) The long shadow of rivalry: Rivalry motivates performance today and tomorrow. Psych. Sci. 29(5):804–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Schweitzer ME (2011) Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(1):129–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Reyt JN, Wiesenfeld BM (2015) Seeing the forest for the trees: Exploratory learning, mobile technology, and knowledge workers’ role integration behaviors. Acad. Management J. 58(3):739–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riedl C, Woolley AW (2017) Teams vs. crowds: A field test of the relative contribution of incentives, member ability, and emergent collaboration to crowd-based problem solving performance. Acad. Management Discoveries 3(4):382–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riedl C, Grad T, Lettl C (2024) Competition and collaboration in crowdsourcing communities: What happens when peers evaluate each other? Organ. Sci. 35 (6):1957–1976.Link, Google Scholar
• Ryvkin D (2011) The optimal sorting of players in contests between groups. Games Econom. Behav. 73(2):564–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. 116(2):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sassenberg K, Scholl A (2019) Linking regulatory focus and threat: Challenge: Transitions between and outcomes of four motivational states. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 30(1):174–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stouffer SA, Suchman EA, DeVinney LC, Star SA, Williams RM Jr (1949) The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life, Studies in Social Psychology in World War II. vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Teodoridis F, Bikard M, Vakili K (2019) Creativity at the knowledge frontier: The impact of specialization in fast-and slow-paced domains. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):894–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• To C, Kilduff GJ, Rosikiewicz B (2020) When interpersonal competition helps and when it harms: An integration via challenge and threat. Ann. Management Rev. 14(2):908–934.Google Scholar
• To C, Kilduff GJ, Ordoñez L, Schweitzer ME (2018) Going for it on fourth down: Rivalry increases risk taking, physiological arousal, and promotion focus. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1281–1306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trochim WM, Donnelly JP (2001) Research Methods Knowledge Base, vol. 2 (Atomic Dog Publishing, Cincinnati, OH).Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2003) Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. 110(3):403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tullock G (1980) Efficient rent seeking. Buchanan J, Tollison R, Tullock G, eds. Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society (Texas A&M University Press, College Station).Google Scholar
• Uribe J, Sytch M, Kim YH (2020) When friends become foes: Collaboration as a catalyst for conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):751–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Der Maas HL, Wagenmakers EJ (2005) A psychometric analysis of chess expertise. Amer. J. Psych. 118(1):29–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Nordenflycht A (2010) What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallace JC, Johnson PD, Frazier ML (2009) An examination of the factorial, construct, and predictive validity and utility of the Regulatory Focus at Work Scale. J. Organ. Behav. 30(6):805–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu E, Huang X, Jia R, Xu J, Liu W, Graham L, Snape E (2020) The “evil pleasure”: Abusive supervision and third-party observers’ malicious reactions toward victims. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1115–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Yip JA, Schweitzer ME, Nurmohamed S (2018) Trash-talking: Competitive incivility motivates rivalry, performance, and unethical behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 144(2018):125–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu T, Cannella AA Jr (2007) Rivalry between multinational enterprises: An event history approach. Acad. Management J. 50(3):665–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajonc RB (1965) Social facilitation. Science 49(3681):269–274.Crossref, Google Scholar