Performance Ranks, Conformity, and Cooperation: Evidence from a Sweater Factory

References

• Ager P, Bursztyn L, Leucht L, Voth J (2022) Killer incentives: Rivalry, performance and risk-taking among German fighter pilots, 1939–45. Rev. Econom. Stud. 89(5):2257–2292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA (1997) Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica 65(5):1005–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof R, Ashraf A, Macchiavello R, Rabbani A (2024) Layoffs and productivity at a Bangladeshi sweater factory. Working paper, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
• Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econom. 95(9–10):1082–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson ML (2008) Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103(484):1481–1495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Jack K (2014a) No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for public services delivery. J. Public Econom. 120:1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Lee SS (2014b) Awards unbundled: Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 100:44–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Iriberri N (2010) The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high school students. J. Public Econom. 94:435–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Bagues M, Cabrales A, Iriberri N (2019) What you don’t know … can’t hurt you? A natural field experiment on relative performance feedback in higher education. Management Sci. 65(8):3714–3736.Link, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2005) Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data. Quart. J. Econom. 120(3):917–962.Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2010) Social incentives in the workplace. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(2):417–458. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barankay I (2011) Rankings and social tournaments: Evidence from a crowd sourcing experiment. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Barankay I (2012) Rank incentives: Evidence from a randomized workplace experiment. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Bernheim DB (1994) A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. 102(5):841–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2008) Status incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(2):206–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader S, Gartenberg C, Prat A (2020) The contingent effect of management practices. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(2):721–749.Google Scholar
• Blanes i Vidal J, Nossol M (2011) Tournaments without prizes: Evidence from personnel records. Management Sci. 57(10):1721–1736.Link, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Lemos R, Sadun R, Scur D, Van Reenen John (2021) World management survey – Manufacturing. Harvard Dataverse, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OY6CBK.Google Scholar
• Breza E, Kaur S, Shamdasani Y (2018) The morale effects of pay inequality. Quart. J. Econom. 133(2):611–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Egorov G, Jensen R (2019) Cool to be smart or smart to be cool? Understanding peer pressure in education. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(4):1487–1526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, Mas A, Moretti E, Saez E (2012) Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2981–3003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Matthews PH, Schirm J (2010) Tournaments and office politics: Evidence from a real effort experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):504–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casaburi L, Macchiavello R (2015) Loyalty, exit and enforcement: Evidence from a Kenya dairy cooperative. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(5):286–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Masclet D, Villeval MC (2014) The dark side of competition for status. Management Sci. 60(1):38–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Danilov A, Harbring C, Irlenbusch B (2019) Helping under a combination of team and tournament incentives. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 162:120–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Sol J, Verbeke W (2013) Tournament incentives in the field: Gender differences in the workplace. J. Labor Econom. 31(2):305–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Pope D (2018) What motivates effort? Evidence and expert forecasts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(2):1029–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U, Rao G (2022) Estimating social preferences and gift exchange at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(3):1038–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutscher C, Frick B, Gürtler O, Prinz J (2013) Sabotage in tournaments with heterogeneous contestants: Empirical evidence from the soccer pitch. Scandinavian J. Econom. 115(4):1138–1157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Grimm S, Grothe D, Schindler D, Schudy S (2024) The efficacy of tournaments for non-routine team tasks. J. Labor Econom. 42(4):921–948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksson T, Poulsen A, Villeval MC (2009) Feedback and incentives: Experimental evidence. Labour Econom. 16(6):679–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fahn M, Zanarone G (2021) Transparency in relational contracts. Strategic Management J. 43(5):1046–1071.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Nosenzo D, Sefton M (2013) Peer effects in pro-social behavior: Social norms or social preferences? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):548–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garicano L, Palacios-Huerta I (2014) Making the beautiful game a bit less beautiful. Palacios-Huerta I, ed. Beautiful Game Theory: How Soccer Can Help Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 124–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Kissová Z, Lee J, Prowse V (2019) First-place loving and last-place loathing: How rank in the distribution of performance affects effort provision. Management Sci. 65(2):494–507.Link, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, List JA (2006) Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica 74(5):1365–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA (2009) Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77(5):1637–1664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goerg SJ, Kube S, Radbruch J (2019) The effectiveness of incentive schemes in the presence of implicit effort costs. Management Sci. 65(9):4063–4078.Link, Google Scholar
• Green JR, Stokey NL (1983) A compariosn of tournaments and contracts. J. Political Econom. 91(3):349–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harbring C, Irlenbusch B (2011) Sabotage in tournaments: Evidence from a laboratory experiment. Management Sci. 57(4):611–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1999) Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(1):169–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jayaraman R, Ray D, de Véricourt F (2016) Anatomy of a contract change. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(2):316–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhnen CM, Tymula A (2012) Feedback, self-esteem and performance in organizations. Management Sci. 58(1):94–113.Link, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKenzie D (2012) Beyond baseline and follow-up: The case for more T in experiments. J. Development Econom. 99(2):210–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A, Shi X (2007) Contests for status. J. Political Econom. 115(2):338–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez-Truglia R (2020) The effects of income transparency on well-being: Evidence from a natural experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(4):1019–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raymond C, Shvets J (2022) Rank vs money: Evidence from managers. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 2256, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
• Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.Link, Google Scholar
• Tonin M, Vlassopoulos M (2015) Corporate philanthropy and productivity: Evidence from an online real effort experiment. Management Sci. 61(8):1795–1811.Link, Google Scholar
• Tran A, Zeckhauser R (2012) Rank as an inherent incentive: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Public Econom. 96(9–10):645–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villeval MC (2020) Performance feedback and peer effects. Zimmermann KF, ed. Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar