Does Exposure to More Women in Male-Dominated Fields Render Female Students More Career-Oriented?
References
- (2008) Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103(484):1481–1495.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The effects of high school peers’ gender on college major, college performance and income. Econom. J. (London) 129(618):553–602.Google Scholar
- (2018) Coase lecture—The glass ceiling. Economica 85(338):205–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labour market outcomes in Norway. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):191–239.Google Scholar
- (2005) Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(2):152–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. J. Econom. Literature 55(3):789–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Gender and willingness to lead: Does the gender composition of teams matter? Rev. Econom. Statist. 104(2):259–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Growing the roots of STEM majors: Female math and science high school faculty and the participation of students in STEM. Econom. Ed. Rev. 45:14–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Brazilian Women in Economics (2018) Annual report: As mulheres nos diferentes estágios da carreira acadêmica em Economia no Brasil. Accessed September 13, 2024, https://bwe.fea.usp.br/wp-content/uploads/sites/834/2021/02/RelatorioCentros2018_final.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2016) Good peers or good teachers? Evidence from a French university. Econom. Ed. Rev. 54:62–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Good peers have asymmetric gendered effects on female educational outcomes: Experimental evidence from Mexico. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 189:727–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(3):414–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Does advisor gender affect women’s persistence in economics? AEA Papers Proc. 111:112–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) The impact of advisor gender on female students’ STEM enrollment and persistence. J. Human Resources 58(2):593–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Adviser value added and student outcomes: Evidence from randomly assigned college advisers. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 14(4):151–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
- CAPES (2020) Qualis Periódicos. Accessed September 13, 2024, https://sucupira-legado.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/veiculoPublicacaoQualis/listaConsultaGeralPeriodicos.jsf.Google Scholar
- (2010) Does professor quality matter? Evidence from random assignment of students to professors. J. Political Econom. 118(3):409–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. Quart. J. Econom. 125(3):1101–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
- CNPq (2020) Plataforma Lattes. Accessed May 1, 2020, http://lattes.cnpq.br.Google Scholar
- Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession (2017) Annual report. Accessed July 26, 2020, https://www.aeaweb.org/content/file?id=6388.Google Scholar
- (2007) The formation of risk sharing networks. J. Development Econom. 83(2):326–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) A community college instructor like me: Race and ethnicity interactions in the classroom. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(8):2567–2591.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Understanding peer effects: On the nature, estimation, and channels of peer effects. J. Labor Econom. 35(2):387–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Faculty gender in the college classroom: Does it matter for achievement and major choice? Southern Econom. J. 81(1):211–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Peer effects in the workplace: Evidence from random groupings in professional golf tournaments. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 1(4):34–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Peer effects and the gender gap in corporate leadership: Evidence from MBA students. CESifo Working Paper No. 11295, Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research - CESifo, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2014) Manager impartiality: Worker-firm matching and the gender wage gap. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 67(2):395–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The positive influence of female college students on their male peers. Labour Econom. 44:151–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) A professor like me: The influence of instructor gender on college achievement. J. Human Resources 44(2):479–494.Google Scholar
- (2022) Advising, gender, and performance: Evidence from a university with exogenous adviser–student gender match. Econom. Inquiry 60(1):121–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Women helping women? Evidence from private sector data on workplace hierarchies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 96(4):638–647.Google Scholar
- (2009) Training, wages, and sample selection: Estimating sharp bounds on treatment effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(3):1071–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Do ability peer effects matter for academic and labor market outcomes? Labour Econom. 71:102022.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Centralized college admissions and student composition. Econom. Ed. Rev. 85:102184.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The effects of professor gender on the postgraduation outcomes of female students. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 75(3):693–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Chipping away at the glass ceiling: Gender spillovers in corporate leadership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):635–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Gender peer effects in university: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Econom. Ed. Rev. 38:51–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Does economics make you sexist? Rev. Econom. Statist. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2020) Gender differences in the choice of major: The importance of female role models. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 12(3):226–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Receita Federal (2020) Brazilian Revenue Service: CNPJ Public Data. Dados Públicos CNPJ. Accessed April 15, 2020, http://receita.economia.gov.br/orientacao/tributaria/cadastros/cadastro-nacional-de-pessoas-juridicas-cnpj/dados-publicos-cnpj.Google Scholar
- (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. 116(2):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far? Hanushek EA, Machin S, Woessmann L, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Education, vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 249–277.Google Scholar
- (2010) Peer group effects in the academic performance of Italian students. Appl. Econom. 42(17):2203–2215.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Women in management and the gender pay gap. IZA Discussion Paper No. 16323, Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2018) Once in the door: Gender, tryouts, and the initial salaries of managers. Management Sci. 64(11):5444–5460.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) Working during school and academic performance. J. Labor Econom. 21(2):473–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Times Higher Education (2019) Latin America university rankings. Accessed July 26, 2020, www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2019/latin-america-university-rankings.Google Scholar
- (2012) Regression methods in biostatistics: Linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models. Statistics for Biology and Health, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
- (2018) Gendered language on the economics job market. AEA Papers Proc. 108:175–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The effect of peer gender on major choice in business school. Management Sci. 67(11):6963–6979.Link, Google Scholar

