Gender Gap in Startup Recruiting: Evidence from Changes in Termination Costs

References

• Abowd JM, Kramarz F (2003) The costs of hiring and separations. Labour Econom. 10(5):499–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Campbell BA, Franco AM, Ganco M (2016) What do I take with me? The mediating effect of spin-out team size and tenure on the founder-firm performance relationship. Acad. Management J. 59(3):1060–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aigner DJ, Cain GG (1977) Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. ILR Rev. 30(2):175–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand J, Kim H, Lu S (2016) Resource characteristics and redeployment strategies: Toward a theoretical synthesis. Folta TB, Helfat CE, Karim S, eds. Resource Redeployment and Corporate Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 35 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 155–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist J, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Belenzon S, Bennett VM, Patacconi A (2019) Flexible production and entry: Institutional, technological, and organizational determinants. Strategy Sci. 4(3):193–216.Link, Google Scholar
• Bird B, Brush C (2002) A gendered perspective on organizational creation. Entrepreneurship. Theory Practice 26(3):41–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black JS, Ashford SJ (1995) Fitting in or making jobs fit: Factors affecting mode of adjustment for new hires. Human Relations 48(4):421–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brett JM, Stroh LK (2003) Working 61 plus hours a week: Why do managers do it? J. Appl. Psych. 88(1):67–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Huang L, Kearney SW, Murray FE (2014) Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4427–4431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brush C, Greene P, Balachandra L, Davis A (2018) The gender gap in venture capital—Progress, problems, and perspectives. Venture Capital 20(2):115–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budig MJ, England P (2001) The wage penalty for motherhood. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(2):204–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calder-Wang S, Gompers PA (2021) And the children shall lead: Gender diversity and performance in venture capital. J. Financial Econom. 142(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campero S, Kacperczyk A (2020) Asymmetric gender homophily in the startup labor market. Tzabbar D, Cirillo B, eds. Employee Inter- and Intra-Firm Mobility, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 41 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 329–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castellaneta F, Conti R, Kacperczyk A (2020) The (un) intended consequences of institutions lowering barriers to entrepreneurship: The impact on female workers. Strategic Management J. 41(7):1274–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cha Y, Weeden KA (2014) Overwork and the slow convergence in the gender gap in wages. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(3):457–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA (1989) Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):333–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi J, Goldschlag N, Haltiwanger J, Kim JD (2023) Early joiners and startup performance. Rev. Econom. Statist., ePub ahead of print October 23, https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman S, Robb A (2009) A comparison of new firm financing by gender: Evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey data. Small Bus. Econom. 33(4):397–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti R, Kacperczyk O, Valentini G (2022) Institutional protection of minority employees and entrepreneurship: Evidence from the LGBT Employment Non‐Discrimination Acts. Strategic Management J. 43(4):758–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2001) Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1691–1730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I (2007) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? Amer. J. Sociol. 112(5):1297–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Decker R, Haltiwanger J, Jarmin R, Miranda J (2014) The role of entrepreneurship in US job creation and economic dynamism. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(3):3–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dezsö CL, Ross DG (2012) Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1072–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eberhart RN, Eesley CE, Eisenhardt KM (2017) Failure is an option: Institutional change, entrepreneurial risk, and new firm growth. Organ. Sci. 28(1):93–112.Link, Google Scholar
• Eddleston KA, Ladge JJ, Mitteness C, Balachandra L (2016) Do you see what I see? Signaling effects of gender and firm characteristics on financing entrepreneurial ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 40(3):489–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C (2016) Institutional barriers to growth: Entrepreneurship, human capital and institutional change. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1290–1306.Link, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Hamilton BH, Zenger TR (2010) The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Sci. 56(4):659–681.Link, Google Scholar
• Engel Y, Lewis T, Cardon MS, Hentschel T (2023) Signaling diversity debt: Startup gender composition and the gender gap in joiners’ interest. Acad. Management J. 66(5):1469–1500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MP, Florida R (1994) The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers 84(2):210–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Field E, Jayachandran S, Pande R, Rigol N (2016) Friendship at work: Can peer effects catalyze female entrepreneurship? Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 8(2):125–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foschi M, Lai L, Sigerson K (1994) Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Soc. Psych. Quart. 57(4):326–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C (2014) A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1091–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorman EH (2006) Work uncertainty and the promotion of professional women: The case of law firm partnership. Soc. Forces 85(2):865–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Kacperczyk A (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 48(7):1666–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman C, Rapson DS (2018) Regression discontinuity in time: Considerations for empirical applications. Annual Rev. Resource Econom. 10:533–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hietaniemi L, Santamaria S, Kacperczyk A, Peltonen J (2024) Human resource redeployability and entrepreneurial hiring strategy. Strategic Management J. 45(2):272–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Shropshire C, Cannella AA Jr (2007) Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Acad. Management J. 50(4):941–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochschild A (2012) The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Hurst WR, Lee S, Frake J (2024) The effect of flatter hierarchy on applicant pool gender diversity: Evidence from experiments. Strategic Management J. 45(8):1446–1484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang KJ, Phillips DJ (2024) Entrepreneurship as a response to labor market discrimination for formerly incarcerated people. Amer. J. Sociol. 130(1):88–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk O, Younkin P (2022) A founding penalty: Evidence from an audit study on gender, entrepreneurship, and future employment. Organ. Sci. 33(2):716–745. Link, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk O, Younkin P, Rocha V (2023) Do employees work less for female leaders? A multi-method study of entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1111–1133.Link, Google Scholar
• Kang SK, DeCelles KA, Tilcsik A, Jun S (2016) Whitened résumés: Race and self-presentation in the labor market. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):469–502. Google Scholar
• Kanze D, Conley MA, Okimoto TG, Phillips DJ, Merluzzi J (2020) Evidence that investors penalize female founders for lack of industry fit. Sci. Adv. 6(48):eabd7664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim PH, Aldrich HE, Keister LA (2006) Access (not) denied: The impact of financial, human, and cultural capital on entrepreneurial entry in the United States. Small Bus. Econom. 27(1):5–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight AP, Greer LL, De Jong B (2020) Start-up teams: A multidimensional conceptualization, integrative review of past research, and future research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):231–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolesár M, Rothe C (2018) Inference in regression discontinuity designs with a discrete running variable. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(8):2277–2304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kugler AD, Saint-Paul G (2004) How do firing costs affect worker flows in a world with adverse selection? J. Labor Econom. 22(3):553–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn KM (2015) Selecting the good vs. rejecting the bad: Regulatory focus effects on staffing decision making. Human Resource Management 54(1):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhnen CM, Oyer P (2016) Exploration for human capital: Evidence from the MBA labor market. J. Labor Econom. 34(S2):S255–S286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Florida R, Acs Z (2004) Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional Stud. 38(8):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung MD (2014) Dilettante or renaissance person? How the order of job experiences affects hiring in an external labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):136–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippmann S, Davis A, Aldrich HE (2005) Entrepreneurship and inequality. Keister LA, ed. Entrepreneurship, Research in the Sociology of Work, vol. 15 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litwin A, Phan PH (2013) Quality over quantity: Reexamining the link between entrepreneurship and job creation. ILR Rev. 66(4):833–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Livingston BA, Judge TA (2008) Emotional responses to work-family conflict: An examination of gender role orientation among working men and women. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):207–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lundberg SJ, Startz R (1983) Private discrimination and social intervention in competitive labor market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 73(3):340–347.Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Chatman J, Caldwell DF (1991) People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad. Management J. 34(3):487–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouimet P, Zarutskie R (2014) Who works for startups? The relation between firm age, employee age, and growth. J. Financial Econom. 112(3):386–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearl J (1995) Causaldiagrams for empirical research. Biometrika 82(4):669–688. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen T, Saporta I (2004) The opportunity structure for discrimination. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(4):852–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(4):659–661.Google Scholar
• Pinnington AH, Sandberg J (2013) Lawyers’ professional careers: Increasing women’s inclusion in the partnership of law firms. Gender Work Organ. 20(6):616–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2011) Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Sauermann H (2015) Founder or joiner? The role of preferences and context in shaping different entrepreneurial interests. Management Sci. 61(9):2160–2184.Link, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Sauermann H (2023) Can technology startups hire talented early employees? Ability, preferences, and employee first job choice. Management Sci. 70(6):3619–3644.Link, Google Scholar
• Rocha V, Grilli L (2024) Early-stage start-up hiring: The interplay between start-ups’ initial resources and innovation orientation. Small Bus. Econom. 62(4):1641–1668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rocha V, van Praag M (2020) Mind the gap: The role of gender in entrepreneurial career choice and social influence by founders. Strategic Management J. 41(5):841–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP (2001) Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):655–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Aldrich HE, Carter NM (2003) The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(2):195–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakhartov AV, Folta TB (2014) Resource relatedness, redeployability, and firm value. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1781–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakhartov AV, Folta TB (2015) Getting beyond relatedness as a driver of corporate value. Strategic Management J. 36(13):1939–1959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santamaria S (2022) Portfolio entrepreneurs’ behavior and performance: A resource redeployment perspective. Management Sci. 68(1):333–354.Link, Google Scholar
• Sarin R, Wieland A (2016) Risk aversion for decisions under uncertainty: Are there gender differences? J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 60:1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H (2018) Fire in the belly? Employee motives and innovative performance in start‐ups versus established firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 12(4):423–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schubert R, Brown M, Gysler M, Brachinger HW (1999) Financial decision-making: Are women really more risk averse? Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(2):381–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheets RG, Ting Y (1988) Determinants of employee-termination benefits in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33(4):607–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starr E, Balasubramanian N, Sakakibara M (2018) Screening spinouts? How noncompete enforceability affects the creation, growth, and survival of new firms. Management Sci. 64(2):552–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Sterling AD, Fernandez RM (2018) Once in the door: Gender, tryouts, and the initial salaries of managers. Management Sci. 64(11):5444–5460.Link, Google Scholar
• Sterling A, Merluzzi J (2019) A longer way in: Tryouts as alternative hiring arrangements in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 39:100122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone P (2007) Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2010) Gender and entrepreneurship as a career choice: Do self-assessments of ability matter? Soc. Psych. Quart. 73(3):288–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2015a) Business as plan B: Institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):671–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2015b) Status beliefs and the spirit of capitalism: Accounting for gender biases in entrepreneurship and innovation. Soc. Forces 94(1):61–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S, Pedulla DS (2016) Masculinity and the stalled revolution: How gender ideologies and norms shape young men’s responses to work-family policies. Gender Soc. 30(4):590–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S, Sharkey AJ (2016) Unequal hard times: The influence of the great recession on gender bias in entrepreneurial financing. Sociol. Sci. 1(3):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A (2021) Statistical discrimination and the rationalization of stereotypes. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 86(1):93–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urbano D, Guerrero M, Ferreira JJ, Fernandes CI (2019) New technology entrepreneurship initiatives: Which strategic orientations and environmental conditions matter in the new socio-economic landscape? J. Tech. Transfer 44(5):1577–1602.Google Scholar
• Valet P, Sauer C, Tolsma J (2021) Preferences for work arrangements: A discrete choice experiment. PLoS One 16(7):e0254483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Naldi L, Wennberg K, Uman T (2024) Learning from their daughters: Family exposure to gender disparity and female representation in male-led ventures. Management Sci. 70(2):671–693.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang T, Aldrich HE (2014) Who’s the boss? Explaining gender inequality in entrepreneurial teams. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):303–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang T, Kacperczyk A (2024) The racial gap in entrepreneurship and opportunities inside established firms. Strategic Management J. 45(4):745–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang T, Kacperczyk A, Naldi L (2024) The motherhood wage penalty and female entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 35(1):27–51.Link, Google Scholar