Dropping Standardized Testing for Admissions Trades Off Information and Access

References

• Abdulkadiroğlu A (2005) College admissions with affirmative action. Internat. J. Game Theory 33(4):535–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allman M, Ashlagi I, Lo I, Love J, Mentzer K, Ruiz-Setz L, O’Connell H (2022) Designing school choice for diversity in the San Francisco unified school district. Proc. 23rd ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 290–291.Google Scholar
• Alvero A, Giebel S, Gebre-Medhin B, Antonio AL, Stevens ML, Domingue BW (2021) Essay content and style are strongly related to household income and SAT scores: Evidence from 60,000 undergraduate applications. Sci. Adv. 7(42):eabi9031.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson N (2020) Colleges are ditching required admission tests over COVID-19. Will They Ever Go Back? The Washington Post (June 15), www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/coronavirus-sat-act-admission/2020/06/15/18c406dc-acca-11ea-a9d9-a81c1a491c52_story.html.Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono P, Aucejo EM, Fang H, Spenner KI (2011) Does affirmative action lead to mismatch? A new test and evidence. Quant. Econom. 2(3):303–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K (1971) The theory of discrimination. Technical report, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
• Avery C, Hoxby C, Jackson C, Burek K, Pope G, Raman M (2006) Cost should be no barrier: An evaluation of the first year of Harvard’s financial aid initiative. NBER Working Paper No 12029, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Aycock K (2021) Record increase in historically underrepresented graduate applicants. Accessed May 19, 2026, https://grad.berkeley.edu/news/announcements/record-high-increase-in-historically-underrepresented-graduate-applicants/.Google Scholar
• Backes B (2012) Do affirmative action bans lower minority college enrollment and attainment?: Evidence from statewide bans. J. Human Resources 47(2):435–455.Google Scholar
• Baek J, Farias V (2021) Fair exploration via axiomatic bargaining. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 34:22034–22045.Google Scholar
• Bagde S, Epple D, Taylor L (2016) Does affirmative action work? Caste, gender, college quality, and academic success in India. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(6):1495–1521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee D, Smilowitz K (2019) Incorporating equity into the school bus scheduling problem. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 131:228–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1957) The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bellafante G (2020) Should Ivy League schools randomly select students (at least for a little while)? New York Times (December 18), www.nytimes.com/2020/12/18/nyregion/ivy-league-admissions-lottery.html.Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2011) The price of fairness. Oper. Res. 59(1):17–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Blackwell D (1953) Equivalent comparisons of experiments. Ann. Math. Statist. 24(2):265–272.Google Scholar
• Bleemer Z (2022) Affirmative action, mismatch, and economic mobility after California’s Proposition 209. Quart. J. Econom. 137(1):115–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleemer Z (2023) Affirmative action and its race-neutral alternatives. J. Public Econom. 220:104839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borghesan E (2022) The heterogeneous effects of changing SAT requirements in admissions: An equilibrium evaluation. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
• Borgs C, Chayes J, Haghtalab N, Kalai AT, Vitercik E (2019) Algorithmic greenlining: An approach to increase diversity. Proc. AAAI/ACM Conf. AI, Ethics, and Society (ACM, New York), 69–76.Google Scholar
• Castera R, Loiseau P, Pradelski BSR (2025) Correlation of rankings in matching markets. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print December 4, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.06067.Google Scholar
• Chade H, Eeckhout J, Smith L (2017) Sorting through search and matching models in economics. J. Econom. Literature 55(2):493–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chade H, Lewis G, Smith L (2014) Student portfolios and the college admissions problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(3):971–1002.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan J, Eyster E (2003) Does banning affirmative action lower college student quality? Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):858–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Deming DJ, Friedman JN (2026) Diversifying society’s leaders? The determinants and causal effects of admission to highly selective private colleges. Technical report. Quart. J. Econom. 141(1):51–145.Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Elmachtoub AN, Lei X (2022) Price discrimination with fairness constraints. Management Sci. 68(12):8536–8552.Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett-Davies S, Gaebler JD, Nilforoshan H, Shroff R, Goel S (2023) The measure and mismeasure of fairness. J. Machine Learn. Res. 24(312):1–117.Google Scholar
• Dessein W, Frankel A, Kartik N (2023) Test-optional admissions. Preprint, submitted April 15, https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07551.Google Scholar
• Dutt K, Pfaff DL, Bernstein AF, Dillard JS, Block CJ (2016) Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience. Nature Geosci. 9(11):805–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Pathak PA (2021) The efficiency of race-neutral alternatives to race-based affirmative action: Evidence from chicago’s exam schools. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):943–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emelianov V, Gast N, Gummadi KP, Loiseau P (2020) On fair selection in the presence of implicit variance. Proc. 21st ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 649–675.Google Scholar
• Epple D, Romano R, Sieg H (2006) Admission, tuition, and financial aid policies in the market for higher education. Econometrica 74(4):885–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espenshade TJ, Radford AW (2013) No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Faenza Y, Gupta S, Zhang X (2020) Impact of bias on school admissions and targeted interventions. Preprint, submitted April 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10846.Google Scholar
• Fershtman D, Pavan A (2020) Soft affirmative action and minority recruitment. Preprint, submitted April 30, https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14953.Google Scholar
• Fu Q (2006) A theory of affirmative action in college admissions. Econom. Inquiry 44(3):420–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman J, Tomkins S, Page L, Goel S (2024) The disparate impacts of college admissions policies on asian american applicants. Sci. Rep. 14:4449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernanzi V, Malherbeti F, Pellizzari M (2004) Take-up of welfare benefits in OECD countries. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/take-up-of-welfare-benefits-in-oecd-countries_525815265414.Google Scholar
• Hoxby CM, Avery C (2012) The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low income students. NBER Working Paper No. 18586, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hu L, Immorlica N, Vaughan JW (2019) The disparate effects of strategic manipulation. Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM, New York), 259–268.Google Scholar
• Hyman J (2016) ACT for all: The effect of mandatory college entrance exams on postsecondary attainment and choice. Ed. Finance Policy 12(3):281–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Immorlica N, Ligett K, Ziani J (2019) Access to population-level signaling as a source of inequality. Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 249–258.Google Scholar
• Kallus N, Zhou A (2021) Fairness, welfare, and equity in personalized pricing. Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM, New York), 296–314.Google Scholar
• Kamada Y, Kojima F (2019) Fair matching under constraints: Theory and applications. Rev. Econom. Stud. 91(2):1162–1199.Google Scholar
• Kannan S, Roth A, Ziani J (2019) Downstream effects of affirmative action. Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM, New York), 240–248.Google Scholar
• Kapor A (2020) Distributional effects of race-blind affirmative action. Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
• Karni G, Rothblum GN, Yona G (2021) On fairness and stability in two-sided matchings. Preprint, submitted November 21, https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.10885.Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J, Raghavan M (2018) Selection Problems in the Presence of Implicit Bias. 9th Innovations Theoret. Comput. Sci. Conf., vol. 33 (Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Wadern, Germany), 1–19.Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Garg N (2021) Test-optional policies: Overcoming strategic behavior and informational gaps. Preprint, submitted July 19, https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.08922.Google Scholar
• Liu LT, Wilson A, Haghtalab N, Kalai AT, Borgs C, Chayes J (2020) The disparate equilibria of algorithmic decision making when individuals invest rationally. Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM, New York), 381–391.Google Scholar
• Long MC (2004) Race and college admissions: An alternative to affirmative action? Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(4):1020–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manshadi V, Niazadeh R, Rodilitz S (2021) Fair dynamic rationing. Proc. 22nd ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 694–695.Google Scholar
• Monachou FG, Ashlagi I (2019) Discrimination in online markets: Effects of social bias on learning from reviews and policy design. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 2142–2152.Google Scholar
• Nieto del Rio GM (2021) University of California will no longer consider SAT and ACT scores. New York Times (May 15), www.nytimes.com/2021/05/15/us/SAT-scores-uc-university-of-california.html.Google Scholar
• Niu M, Kannan S, Roth A, Vohra R (2022) Best vs. all: Equity and accuracy of standardized test score reporting. Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM, New York), 574–586.Google Scholar
• Park JJ, Becks AH (2015) Who benefits from SAT prep?: An examination of high school context and race/ethnicity. Rev. Higher Ed. 39(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(4):659–661.Google Scholar
• Phelps R (2005) Defending Standardized Testing (Psychology Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reardon SF (2011) The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. Duncan GJ, Murnane RJ, eds. Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 91–116.Google Scholar
• Reeves R, Halikias D (2017) Race Gaps in SAT Scores Highlight Inequality and Hinder Upward Mobility (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Rothstein JM (2004) College performance predictions and the SAT. J. Econom. 121(1–2):297–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saul S (2023) If affirmative action ends, college admissions may be changed forever. New York Times (January 16), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/15/us/affirmative-action-admissions-scotus.html.Google Scholar
• Schmill S (2022) We are reinstating our SAT/ACT requirement for future admissions cycles. MIT Admission Blog (March 28), https://mitadmissions.org/blogs/entry/we-are-reinstating-our-sat-act-requirement-for-future-admissions-cycles/.Google Scholar
• Selingo J (2020) Who Gets In and Why: A Year Inside College Admissions (Scribner, New York).Google Scholar
• Sinclair SR, Banerjee S, Yu CL (2022) Sequential fair allocation: Achieving the optimal envy-efficiency tradeoff curve. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Rev. 50(1):95–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smilowitz K, Keppler S (2020) On the use of operations research and management in public education systems. INFORMS TutORials in Operations Research: Pushing the Boundaries: Frontiers in Impactful OR/OM Research (INFORMS, Catonsville, MD), 84–105.Link, Google Scholar
• Tomkins S, Grossman J, Page LC, Goel S (2023) Showing high-achieving college applicants past admissions outcomes increases undermatching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120(45):e2306017120.Google Scholar
• UC Standardized Testing Task Force (2020) Report of the UC Academic Council Standardized Testing Task Force. senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/underreview/sttf-report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Zwick R (2002) Fair Game?: The Use of Standardized Admissions Tests in Higher Education (Psychology Press, RoutledgeFalmer, New York).Google Scholar