Adaptive Preference Measurement with Unstructured Data

References

• Abernethy J, Evgeniou T, Toubia O, Vert J-P (2007) Eliciting consumer preferences using robust adaptive choice questionnaires. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 20(2):145–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berkenkamp F, Krause A, Schoellig AP (2023) Bayesian optimization with safety constraints: Safe and automatic parameter tuning in robotics. Machine Learn. 112(10):3713–3747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.Google Scholar
• Burnap A, Hauser JR, Timoshenko A (2023) Product aesthetic design: A machine learning augmentation. Marketing Sci. 42(6):1029–1056.Link, Google Scholar
• Chaloner K, Verdinelli I (1995) Bayesian experimental design: A review. Statist. Sci. 10(3):273–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Lee D, Tambe P (2022) InnoVAE: Generative AI for understanding patents and innovation. Preprint, submitted April 13, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3868599.Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov V, Chetverikov D, Demirer M, Duflo E, Hansen C, Newey W, Robins J (2018) Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. Econom. J. 21(1):C1–C68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chipman HA, George EI, McCulloch RE (2010) BART: Bayesian additive regression trees. Ann. Appl. Statist. 4(1):266–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dew R, Ansari A, Toubia O (2022) Letting logos speak: Leveraging multiview representation learning for data-driven branding and logo design. Marketing Sci. 41(2):401–425.Link, Google Scholar
• Dzyabura D, Hauser JR (2011) Active machine learning for consideration heuristics. Marketing Sci. 30(5):801–819.Link, Google Scholar
• Dzyabura D, El Kihal S, Hauser JR, Ibragimov M (2023) Leveraging the power of images in managing product return rates. Marketing Sci. 42(6):1125–1142.Link, Google Scholar
• Elrod T, Louviere JJ, Davey KS (1992) An empirical comparison of ratings-based and choice-based conjoint models. J. Marketing Res. 29(3):368–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garnett R (2023) Bayesian Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawlikowski J, Tassi CRN, Ali M, Lee J, Humt M, Feng J, Kruspe A, et al. (2023) A survey of uncertainty in deep neural networks. Artificial Intelligence Rev. 56(1):1513–1589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gómez-Bombarelli R, Wei JN, Duvenaud D, Hernández-Lobato JM, Sánchez-Lengeling B, Sheberla D, Aguilera-Iparraguirre J, Hirzel TD, Adams RP, Aspuru-Guzik A (2018) Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules. ACS Central Sci. 4(2):268–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopalan P, Hofman JM, Blei DM (2015) Scalable recommendation with hierarchical Poisson factorization. Meila M, Heskes T, eds. 31st Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (AUAI Press, Amsterdam), 326–335.Google Scholar
• Green PE, Srinivasan V (1978) Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. J. Consumer Res. 5(2):103–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He X, Liao L, Zhang H, Nie L, Hu X, Chua TS (2017) Neural collaborative filtering. Barrett R, Cummings R, eds. Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Geneva), 173–182.Google Scholar
• Hennig P, Schuler CJ (2012) Entropy search for information-efficient global optimization. J. Machine Learn. Res. 13(6):1809–1837.Google Scholar
• Huang D, Luo L (2016) Consumer preference elicitation of complex products using fuzzy support vector machine active learning. Marketing Sci. 35(3):445–464.Link, Google Scholar
• Jamieson KG, Jain L, Fernandez C, Glattard NJ, Nowak R (2015) NEXT: A system for real-world development, evaluation, and application of active learning. Cortes C, Lawrence N, Lee D, Sugiyama M, Garnett R, eds. Proc. 28th Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 2656–2664.Google Scholar
• Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J. Global Optim. 13:455–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joo M, Thompson ML, Allenby GM (2019) Optimal product design by sequential experiments in high dimensions. Management Sci. 65(7):3235–3254.Link, Google Scholar
• Kang N, Ren Y, Feinberg F, Papalambros P (2019) Form + function: Optimizing aesthetic product design via adaptive, geometrized preference elicitation. Preprint, submitted December 10, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.05047.Google Scholar
• Kim H, Allenby GM (2022) Integrating textual information into models of choice and scaled response data. Marketing Sci. 41(4):815–830.Link, Google Scholar
• Kingma DP, Welling M (2013) Auto-encoding variational Bayes. Preprint, submitted December 20, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.6114.Google Scholar
• Koren Y, Bell R, Volinsky C (2009) Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42(8):30–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kushner HJ (1964) A new method of locating the maximum point of an arbitrary multipeak curve in the presence of noise. J. Basic Engrg. 86(1):97–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu L, Dzyabura D, Mizik N (2020) Visual listening in: Extracting brand image portrayed on social media. Marketing Sci. 39(4):669–686.Link, Google Scholar
• Lundberg SM, Lee S-I (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. von Luxburg U, Guyon I, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, eds. Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 4768–4777.Google Scholar
• McInnes L, Healy J, Melville J (2018) UMAP: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. Preprint, submitted February 9, https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426.Google Scholar
• Neal RM (1996) Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks, Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 118 (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Netzer O, Srinivasan V (2011) Adaptive self-explication of multiattribute preferences. J. Marketing Res. 48(1):140–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Netzer O, Toubia O, Bradlow ET, Dahan E, Evgeniou T, Feinberg FM, Feit EM, et al. (2008) Beyond conjoint analysis: Advances in preference measurement. Marketing Lett. 19:337–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennington J, Socher R, Manning CD (2014) GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. Moschitti A, Pang B, Daelemans W, eds. Proc. 2014 Conf. Empirical Methods Natl. Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Doha, Qatar), 1532–1543.Google Scholar
• Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2006) Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Robins JM, Rotnitzky A, Zhao LP (1994) Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 89(427):846–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Settles B (2010) Active learning literature survey. Technical report, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison.Google Scholar
• Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Preprint, submitted September 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556.Google Scholar
• Sisodia A, Burnap A, Kumar V (2024) Generative interpretable visual design: Using disentanglement for visual conjoint analysis. Preprint, submitted August 3, 2024, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4151019.Google Scholar
• Snoek J, Larochelle H, Adams RP (2012) Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. Pereira F, Burges CJC, Bottou L, Weinberger KQ, eds. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 2951–2959.Google Scholar
• Srinivas N, Krause A, Kakade SM, Seeger M (2010) Gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting: No regret and experimental design. Fürnkranz J, Joachims T, eds. Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (Omnipress, Madison, WI), 1015–1022.Google Scholar
• Tian Z, Dew R, Iyengar R (2024) Mega or micro? Influencer selection using follower elasticity. J. Marketing Res. 61(3):472–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O (2018) Conjoint analysis. Mizik N, Hanssens D, eds. Handbook of Marketing Analytics: Methods and Applications in Marketing Management, Public Policy, and Litigation Support (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 52–78.Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Evgeniou T, Johnson E, Delquié P (2012) Dynamic experiments for estimating preferences: An adaptive method of eliciting time and risk parameters. Management Sci. 59(3):613–640.Link, Google Scholar
• Vriens M, Oppewal H, Wedel M (1998) Ratings-based vs. choice-based latent class conjoint models. Internat. J. Marketing Res. 40(3):1–11.Google Scholar
• Wilson AG (2020) The case for Bayesian deep learning. Preprint, submitted January 29, https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.10995.Google Scholar