Tailor-to-Target: Configuring Collaborative Shareholder Engagements on Climate Change

References

• Aguilera RV, Aragón-Correa JA, Marano V, Tashman PA (2021) The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. J. Management 47(6):1468–1497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Desender K, Bednar MK, Lee JH (2015) Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):483–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arjaliès DL, Grant P, Hardie I, MacKenzie D, Svetlova E (2017) Chains of Finance: How Investment Management Is Shaped (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aversa P, Furnari S, Haefliger S (2015) Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing, 2005–2013. Indust. Corporate Change 24(3):655–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barko T, Cremers M, Renneboog L (2021) Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance. J. Bus. Ethics 180:777–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP, Neale M, Rao H (2016) Extending nonmarket strategy: Political economy and the radical flank effect in private politics. Strategy Sci. 1(2):105–126.Link, Google Scholar
• Bates K, Hennessy D (2010) Tilting at windmills or contested norms? Dissident proxy initiatives in Canada. Corporate Governance Internat. Rev. 18(4):360–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauer R, Derwall J, Tissen C (2022) Private shareholder engagements on material ESG issues. Preprint, submitted July 29, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4171496.Google Scholar
• Bauer R, Moers F, Viehs M (2015) Who withdraws shareholder proposals and does it matter? An analysis of sponsor identity and pay practices. Corporate Governance Internat. Rev. 23(6):472–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beccarini I, Beunza D, Ferraro F, Hoepner AGF (2023) The contingent role of conflict: Deliberative interaction and disagreement in shareholder engagement. Bus. Ethics Quart. 33(1):26–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell RG, Filatotchev I, Aguilera RV (2014) Corporate governance and investors’ perceptions of foreign IPO value: An institutional perspective. Acad. Management J. 57(1):301–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Partnoy F, Thomas R (2008) Hedge fund activism, corporate governance, and firm performance. J. Finance 63(4):1729–1775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Gupta A (2016) Social activism in and around organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):671–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Chin MK, Hambrick DC (2014) CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1786–1809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bundy J, Shropshire C, Buchholtz AK (2013) Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):352–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bundy J, Vogel RM, Zachary MA (2018) Organization–stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders. Strategic Management J. 39(2):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JT, Sirmon DG, Schijven M (2016) Fuzzy logic and the market: A configurational approach to investor perceptions of acquisition announcements. Acad. Management J. 59(1):163–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlos WC, Lewis BW (2018) Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(1):130–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castañer X, Oliveira N (2020) Collaboration, coordination, and cooperation among organizations: Establishing the distinctive meanings of these terms through a systematic literature review. J. Management 46(6):965–1001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2014) Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management J. 35(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chhaochharia V, Kumar A, Niessen-Ruenzi A (2012) Local investors and corporate governance. J. Accounting Econom. 54(1):42–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David P, Bloom M, Hillman AJ (2007) Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management J. 28(1):91–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF (2009) Managed by the Markets: How Finance Re-Shaped America (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Del Guercio D, Seery L, Woidtke T (2008) Do boards pay attention when institutional investor activists “just vote no”? J. Financial Econom. 90(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmas MA, Pekovic S (2018) Organizational configurations for sustainability and employee productivity: A qualitative comparative analysis approach. Bus. Soc. 57(1):216–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai VM (2018) Collaborative stakeholder engagement: An integration between theories of organizational legitimacy and learning. Acad. Management J. 61(1):220–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DesJardine MR, Durand R (2020) Disentangling the effects of hedge fund activism on firm financial and social performance. Strategic Management J. 41(6):1054–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimson E, Karakaş O, Li X (2015) Active ownership. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(12):3225–3268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimson E, Karakaş O, Li X (2023) Coordinated engagements. Preprint, submitted April 27, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=3209072.Google Scholar
• Doidge C, Dyck A, Mahmudi H, Virani A (2019) Collective action and governance activism. Rev. Finance 23(5):893–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Hawn O, Ioannou I (2019) Willing and able: A general model of organizational responses to normative pressures. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):299–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dwivedi P, Joshi A, Misangyi VF (2018) Gender-inclusive gatekeeping: How (mostly male) predecessors influence the success of female CEOs. Acad. Management J. 61(2):379–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmans A (2014) Blockholders and corporate governance. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 6(1):23–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Lenox MJ (2006) Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management J. 27(8):765–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Decelles KA, Lenox M (2016) Through the mud or in the boardroom: Examining activist types and their strategies in targeting firms for social change. Strategic Management J. 37(12):2425–2440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertimur Y, Ferri F, Oesch D (2013) Shareholder votes and proxy advisors: Evidence from say on pay. J. Accounting Res. 51(5):951–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferraro F, Beunza D (2018) Creating common ground: A communicative action model of dialogue in shareholder engagement. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1187–1207.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferraro F, Etzion D, Gehman J (2015) Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organ. Stud. 36(3):363–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichtner J, Heemskerk EM (2020) The new permanent universal owners: Index funds, patient capital, and the distinction between feeble and forceful stewardship. Econom. Soc. 49(4):493–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filatotchev I, Wright M (2017) Methodological issues in governance research: An editor’s perspective. Corporate Governance: An Internat. Rev. 25(6):454–460.Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2007) A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1180–1198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Management J. 54(2):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Sharapov D, Cronqvist L (2013) Opposites attract? Opportunities and challenges for integrating large-N QCA and econometric analysis. Political Res. Quart. 66(1):191–198.Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2015) Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Sci. 61(11):2549–2568.Link, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Toffel MW, Viswanathan K (2021) Shareholder activism and firms’ voluntary disclosure of climate change risks. Strategic Management J. 42(10):1850–1879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furnari S, Crilly D, Misangyi VF, Greckhamer T, Fiss PC, Aguilera R (2021) Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):778–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Howard-Grenville J, Joshi A, Tihanyi L (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1880–1895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerring J (2008) The mechanismic worldview: Thinking inside the box. British J. Political Sci. 38(1):161–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gifford EJM (2010) Effective shareholder engagement: The factors that contribute to shareholder salience. J. Bus. Ethics 92(1):79–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goertz G (2017) Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies: An Integrated Approach (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Gond JP, O’Sullivan N, Slager R, Viehs M, Homanen M, Mosony S (2018) How ESG Engagement Creates Value for Investors and Companies (Principles for Responsible Investment, London). https://www.unpri.org/download?ac=4637.Google Scholar
• Gond JP, Piani V (2013) Enabling institutional investors’ collective action: The role of the Principles for Responsible Investment initiative. Bus. Soc. 52(1):64–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman J, Arenas D (2015) Engaging ethically: A discourse ethics perspective on social shareholder engagement. Bus. Ethics Quart. 25(2):163–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goranova M, Ryan LV (2014) Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. J. Management 40(5):1230–1268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandori A, Furnari S (2008) A chemistry of organization: Combinatory analysis and design. Organ. Stud. 29(3):459–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant D, Jorgenson AK, Longhofer W (2018) Pathways to carbon pollution: The interactive effects of global, political, and organizational factors on power plants’ CO2 emissions. Sociol. Sci. 5:58–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant D, Trautner MN, Downey L, Thiebaud L (2010) Bringing the polluters back in: Environmental inequality and the organization of chemical production. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(4):479–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greckhamer T (2016) CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries: The configurational impact of country‐level institutions. Strategic Management J. 37(4):793–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greckhamer T, Misangyi VF, Fiss PC (2013) The two QCAs: From a small-N to a large-N set theoretic approach. Fiss PC, Cambré B, Marx A, eds. Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 49–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greckhamer T, Furnari S, Fiss PC, Aguilera RV (2018) Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organ. 16(4):482–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal J, Riedl EJ, Serafeim G (2019) Market reaction to mandatory nonfinancial disclosure. Management Sci. 65(7):3061–3084.Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta K, Crilly D, Greckhamer T (2020) Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective. Strategic Management J. 41(10):1869–1900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadani M, Doh JP, Schneider M (2019) Social movements and corporate political activity: Managerial responses to socially oriented shareholder activism. J. Bus. Res. 95:156–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawley J, Williams A (2000) The emergence of universal owners: Some implications of institutional equity ownership. Challenge 43(4):43–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawn O, Chatterji AK, Mitchell W (2017) Do investors actually value sustainability? New evidence from investor reactions to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI). Strategic Management J. 39(4):949–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R (2020) Reimagining Capitalism in a World on Fire (PublicAffairs, New York).Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ, McGlinch J (2019) ESG, material credit events, and credit risk. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 31(2):105–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kubik JD, Scheinkman JA (2012) Financial Constraints on Corporate Goodness (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville JA (2007) Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: Issue selling as resourcing. Organ. Sci. 18(4):560–577.Link, Google Scholar
• Jahnke P (2019) Ownership concentration and institutional investors’ governance through voice and exit. Bus. Politics 21(3):327–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge WQ, Gaur A, Muller‐Kahle MI (2010) Antecedents of shareholder activism in target firms: Evidence from a multi‐country study. Corporate Governance Internat. Rev. 18(4):258–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khan M, Serafeim G, Yoon A (2016) Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. Accounting Rev. 91(6):1697–1724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim I, Wan H, Wang B, Yang T (2019) Institutional investors and corporate environmental, social, and governance policies: Evidence from toxics release data. Management Sci. 65(10):4901–4926.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim S, Yoon A (2023) Analyzing active fund managers’ commitment to ESG: Evidence from the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment. Management Sci. 69(2):741–758.Link, Google Scholar
• King BG (2008) A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Bus. Soc. 47(1):21–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, McDonnell MH (2015) Good firms, good targets: The relationship among corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting. Tsutsui K, Lim A, eds. Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 430–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Pearce NA (2010) The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:249–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein A, Zur E (2009) Entrepreneurial shareholder activism: Hedge funds and other private investors. J. Finance 64(1):187–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kölbel JF, Heeb F, Paetzold F, Busch T (2020) Can sustainable investing save the world? Reviewing the mechanisms of investor impact. Organ. Environ. 33(4):554–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Logsdon JM, Van Buren HJ (2009) Beyond the proxy vote: Dialogues between shareholder activists and corporations. J. Bus. Ethics 87(1):353–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2001) Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackie JL (1980) The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCahery JA, Sautner Z, Starks LT (2016) Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. J. Finance 71(6):2905–2932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, King BG, Soule SA (2015) A dynamic process model of private politics: Activist targeting and corporate receptivity to social challenges. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(3):654–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, Odziemkowska K, Pontikes E (2021) Bad company: Shifts in social activists’ tactics and resources after industry crises. Organ. Sci. 32(4):1033–1055.Link, Google Scholar
• McNulty T, Nordberg D (2016) Ownership, activism and engagement: Institutional investors as active owners. Corporate Governance Internat. Rev. 24(3):346–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meuer J, Rupietta C (2017a) Integrating QCA and HLM for multilevel research on organizational configurations. Organ. Res. Methods 20(2):324–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meuer J, Rupietta C (2017b) A review of integrated QCA and statistical analyses. Quality Quant. 51(5):2063–2083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1978) Patterns in strategy formation. Management Sci. 24(9):934–948.Link, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H, Waters JA (1985) Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management J. 6(3):257–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misangyi VF, Acharya AG (2014) Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1681–1705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misangyi VF, Greckhamer T, Furnari S, Fiss PC, Crilly D, Aguilera R (2017) Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. J. Management 43(1):255–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):853–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neubaum DO, Zahra SA (2006) Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. J. Management 32(1):108–131.Google Scholar
• Odziemkowska K (2022) Frenemies: Overcoming audiences’ ideological opposition to firm–activist collaborations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(2):469–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragin CC (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Ragin CC (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rehbein K, Logsdon JM, Van Buren HJ (2013) Corporate responses to shareholder activists: Considering the dialogue alternative. J. Bus. Ethics 112(1):137–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Metiu A, George VP (2001) From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):748–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowley TJ, Moldoveanu M (2003) When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Acad. Management Rev. 28(2):204–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandberg J (2013) (Re‐)interpreting fiduciary duty to justify socially responsible investment for pension funds? Corporate Governance Internat. Rev. 21(5):436–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schifeling T, Soderstrom S (2021) Advancing reform: Embedded activism to develop climate solutions. Acad. Management J. 65(6):1775–1803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider CQ, Rohlfing I (2013) Combining QCA and process tracing in set-theoretic multi-method research. Sociol. Methods Res. 42(4):559–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider CQ, Wagemann C (2013) Doing justice to logical remainders in QCA: Moving beyond the standard analysis. Political Res. Quart. 66(1):211–220.Google Scholar
• Semenova N, Hassel LG (2019) Private engagement by Nordic institutional investors on environmental, social, and governance risks in global companies. Corporate Governance Internat. Rev. 27(2):144–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Serafeim G (2018) Investors as stewards of the commons? J. Appl. Corporate Finance 30(2):8–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sikavica K, Perrault E, Rehbein K (2020) Who do they think they are? Identity as an antecedent of social activism by institutional shareholders. Bus. Soc. 59(6):1228–1268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soderstrom SB, Weber K (2020) Organizational structure from interaction: Evidence from corporate sustainability efforts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):226–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, De Vries W, De Wit CA (2015) Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Sci. 347(6223).Google Scholar
• Sundaramurthy C, Lewis M (2003) Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):397–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thiem A, Dusa A (2013) QCA: A package for qualitative comparative analysis. R J. 5(1):87–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management J. 18(4):303–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang DJ, Soule SA (2012) Social movement organizational collaboration: Networks of learning and the diffusion of protest tactics, 1960–1995. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(6):1674–1722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward AJ, Brown JA, Rodriguez D (2009) Governance bundles, firm performance, and the substitutability and complementarity of governance mechanisms. Corporate Governance Internat. Rev. 17(5):646–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whiteman G, Walker B, Perego P (2013) Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. J. Management Stud. 50(2):307–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema M, Ahn A, Zhang Y (2020) Activist hedge fund success: The role of reputation. Strategic Management. J. 41(13):2493–2517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Witt MA, Fainshmidt S, Aguilera RV (2022) Our board, our rules: Nonconformity to global corporate governance norms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(1):131–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood DJ, Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Bryan LM (2021) Stakeholder identification and salience after 20 years: Progress, problems, and prospects. Bus. Soc. 60(1):196–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright C, Nyberg D (2016) An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1633–1661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Murrell A (2021) Does a virtuous circle really exist? Revisiting the causal linkage between CSP and CFP. J. Bus. Ethics 177:173–192.Crossref, Google Scholar