Planned vs. Actual Attention

References

• Agranov M, Caplin A, Tergiman C (2015) Naive play and the process of choice in guessing games. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(2):146–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alós-Ferrer C, Garagnani M (2020) The cognitive foundations of cooperation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 175:71–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avoyan A, Schotter A (2020) Attention in games: An experimental study. Eur. Econom. Rev. 124:103410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avoyan A, Ribeiro M, Schotter A (2022) Personal Lotteries. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
• Bouwmeester S, Verkoeijen PP, Aczel B, Barbosa F, Bègue L, Brañas-Garza P, Chmura TG, et al. (2017) Registered replication report: Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012). Perspect. Psych. Sci. 12(3):527–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caplin A, Dean M (2011) Search, choice, and revealed preference. Theoretical Econom. 6(1):19–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caplin A, Dean M, Martin D (2011) Search and satisficing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):2899–2922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen F, Krajbich I (2018) Biased sequential sampling underlies the effects of time pressure and delay in social decision making. Nature Comm. 9(1):1–10.Google Scholar
• Devetag G, Di Guida S, Polonio L (2016) An eye-tracking study of feature-based choice in one-shot games. Experiment. Econom. 19(1):177–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Krajbich I (2022) Using response times to infer others’ private information: An application to information cascades. Management Sci. 68(4):2970–2986.Link, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Prowse VL (2017) Strategic complexity and the value of thinking. Preprint, submitted September 25, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3041519.Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausfeld J, Fischbacher U, Knoch D (2020) The value of decision-making power in social decisions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 177:898–912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(5):1449–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler J, Kivimaki H, Niederle M (2017) Thinking fast and slow: Generosity over time. Accessed May 1, 2020, http://assets.wharton.upenn.edu/˜juddk/papers/KesslerKivimakiNiederle_GenerosityOverTime.pdf.Google Scholar
• Knoepfle DT, Wang JT-Y, Camerer CF (2009) Studying learning in games using eye-tracking. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(2–3):388–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konovalov A, Krajbich I (2019) Revealed strength of preference: Inference from response times. Judgment Decision Making 14(4):381–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajbich I, Oud B, Fehr E (2014) Benefits of neuroeconomic modeling: New policy interventions and predictors of preference. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):501–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajbich I, Bartling B, Hare T, Fehr E (2015) Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference. Nature Comm. 6(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leland JW, Schneider M (2015) Salience and strategy choice in 2 × 2 games. Games 6(4):521–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meißner M, Oll J (2019) The promise of eye-tracking methodology in organizational research: A taxonomy, review, and future avenues. Organ. Res. Methods 22(2):590–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orquin JL, Loose SM (2013) Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Psychologica (Amsterdam) 144(1):190–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oud B, Krajbich I, Miller K, Cheong JH, Botvinick M, Fehr E (2016) Irrational time allocation in decision-making. Proc. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283(1822):20151439.Google Scholar
• Polonio L, Di Guida S, Coricelli G (2015) Strategic sophistication and attention in games: An eye-tracking study. Games Econom. Behav. 94:80–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radner R, Rothschild M (1975) On the allocation of effort. J. Econom. Theory 10(3):358–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Greene JD, Nowak MA (2012) Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489(7416):427–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Recalde MP, Riedl A, Vesterlund L (2018) Error-prone inference from response time: The case of intuitive generosity in public-good games. J. Public Econom. 160:132–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (2007) Instinctive and cognitive reasoning: A study of response times. Econom. J. (London) 117(523):1243–1259.Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (2016) A typology of players: Between instinctive and contemplative. Quart. J. Econom. 131(2):859–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiliopoulos L, Ortmann A (2018) The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics. Experiment. Econom. 21(2):383–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tinghög G, Andersson D, Bonn C, Böttiger H, Josephson C, Lundgren G, Västfjäll D, Kirchler M, Johannesson M (2013) Intuition and cooperation reconsidered. Nature 498(7452):E1–E2.Crossref, Google Scholar