Vicarious Learning Without Knowledge Differentials

References

• Acemoglu D, Dahleh MA, Lobel I, Ozdaglar A (2011) Bayesian learning in social networks. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(4):1201–1236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal VA, Posen HE, Workiewicz M (2017) Adaptive capacity to technological change: A microfoundational approach. Strategic Management J. 38(6):1212–1231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (2018) Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, De Palma A, Thisse JF (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (2012) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Argote L (2015) Knowledge transfer and organizational learning. Kraiger K, Passmore J, Rebelo dos Santos N, Malvezzi S, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development, and Performance Improvement (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 154–170.Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Lee S, Park J (2021) Organizational learning processes and outcomes: Major findings and future research directions. Management Sci. 67(9):5399–5429.Link, Google Scholar
• Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econom. J. 99(394):116–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axley SR (1984) Managerial and organizational communication in terms of the conduit metaphor. Acad. Management Rev. 9(3):428–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bala V, Goyal S (1998) Learning from neighbours. Rev. Econom. Stud. 65(3):595–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1977) Social Learning Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Banerjee A (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Fudenberg D (2004) Word-of-mouth learning. Games Econom. Behav. 46(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Breza E, Chandrasekhar AG, Mobius M (2021) Naive learning with uninformed agents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(11):3540–3574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JAY, Felin T (2013) What are microfoundations? Acad. Management Perspect. 27(2):138–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Li SX, Usher JM (2000) Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(4):766–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Rowley TJ, Shipilov AV, Chuang YT (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):536–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann O, Eggers JP, Stieglitz N (2019) Colleagues and competitors: How internal social comparisons shape organizational search and adaptation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(2):275–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battigalli P, Francetich A, Lanzani G, Marinacci M (2019) Learning and self-confirming long-run biases. J. Econom. Theory 183:740–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker J, Brackbill D, Centola D (2017) Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(26):5070–5076.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, MIT Press Series in Financial Studies, vol. 9 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein E, Shore J, Lazer D (2018) How intermittent breaks in interaction improve collective intelligence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(35):8734–8739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Polit. Econom. 100(5):992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brackbill D, Centola D (2020) Impact of network structure on collective learning: An experimental study in a data science competition. PLoS One 15(9):e0237978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresman H (2013) Changing routines: A process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Acad. Management J. 56(1):35–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresman H, Birkinshaw J, Nobel R (1999) Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 30(3):439–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Ho TH (1999) Experience‐weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica 67(4):827–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Sacerdote BI, West JE (2013) From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica 81(3):855–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Learning from peers: Knowledge transfer and sales force productivity growth. Marketing Sci. 33(4):463–484.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Delecourt S, Hasan S, Koning R (2019) When does advice impact startup performance? Strategic Management J. 40(3):331–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che YK, Hörner J (2018) Recommender systems as mechanisms for social learning. Quart. J. Econom. 133(2):871–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark HH (1996) Using Language (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clough DR, Piezunka H (2020) Tie dissolution in market networks: A theory of vicarious performance feedback. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(4):972–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corstjens ML, Gautschi DA (1983) Formal choice models in marketing. Marketing Sci. 2(1):19–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Daw ND, O’Doherty JP, Dayan P, Seymour B, Dolan RJ (2006) Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature 441(7095):876–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeGroot MH (1974) Reaching a consensus. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69(345):118–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J (2003) Vicarious learning, undersampling of failure, and the myths of management. Organ. Sci. 14(3):227–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaul A (2018) Motivation and ability? A behavioral perspective on the pursuit of radical invention in multi-technology incumbents. Acad. Management J. 61(1):67–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Fudenberg D (1993) Rules of thumb for social learning. J. Polit. Econom. 101(4):612–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Fudenberg D (1995) Word-of-mouth communication and social learning. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):93–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Roth AE (1998) Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(4):848–881.Google Scholar
• Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21(3):625–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, von Krogh G, Monteiro E, Lakhani KR (2016) Special section introduction—Online community as space for knowledge flows. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):668–684.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ, Ployhart RE (2015) The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):575–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (1985) The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 59:377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franz L, Shrestha YR, Paudel B (2020) A deep learning pipeline for patient diagnosis prediction using electronic health records. Preprint, submitted June 23, https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.16926.Google Scholar
• Friedkin NE, Proskurnikov AV, Mei W, Bullo F (2019) Mathematical structures in group decision-making on resource allocation distributions. Sci. Rep. 9(1):1377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Terlaak A (2013) Decomposing uncertainty and its effects on imitation in firm exit decisions. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1847–1869.Link, Google Scholar
• Gettier E (1963) Is knowledge justified true belief? Analysis 23(6):121–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittins JC (1979) Bandit processes and dynamic allocation indices. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Methodological 41(2):148–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giustiziero G, Kaul A, Wu B (2019) The dynamics of learning and competition in Schumpeterian environments. Organ. Sci. 30(4):668–693.Link, Google Scholar
• Golub B, Jackson MO (2010) Naive learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 2(1):112–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grecu DL, Becker LA (1998) Coactive learning for distributed data mining. Proc. Fourth Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (AAAI), 209–213.Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998a) Managerial cognition and the mimetic adoption of market positions: What you see is what you do. Strategic Management J. 19(10):967–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998b) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2000) Marketing niche entry decisions: Competition, learning, and strategy in Tokyo banking, 1894–1936. Acad. Management J. 43(5):816–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46(6):685–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunning D (2017) Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Report, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
• Gutwin C, Penner R, Schneider K (2004) Group awareness in distributed software development. Proc. 2004 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 72–81.Google Scholar
• Hasan S, Koning R (2019) Prior ties and the limits of peer effects on startup team performance. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1394–1416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman HA (1993) Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(4):593–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J (2017) The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Herriott SR, Levinthal DA, March JG (1985) Learning from experience in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(2):298–302.Google Scholar
• Heyes C (2018) Cognitive Gadgets: The Cultural Evolution of Thinking (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
• Hong L, Page SE (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101(46):16385–16389.Google Scholar
• Hu MM, Yang S, Xu DY (2019) Understanding the social learning effect in contagious switching behavior. Management Sci. 65(10):4771–4794.Link, Google Scholar
• Juang WT (2001) Learning from popularity. Econometrica 69(3):735–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Beckman CM, Moliterno TP (2015) Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):228–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaustia M, Knüpfer S (2008) Do investors overweight personal experience? Evidence from IPO subscriptions. J. Finance 63(6):2679–2702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kavadias S, Sommer SC (2009) The effects of problem structure and team diversity on brainstorming effectiveness. Management Sci. 55(12):1899–1913.Link, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Cummings JN (2002) What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. Hinds P, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 57–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Miner AS (2007) Vicarious learning from the failures and near-failures of others: Evidence from the US commercial banking industry. Acad. Management J. 50(3):687–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Srikanth K (2014) Coordinated exploration: Organizing joint search by multiple specialists to overcome mutual confusion and joint myopia. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):409–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA, Puranam P (2019) Editorial: A model is a model. Strategy Sci. 4:1–3.Link, Google Scholar
• Koçak Ö, Levinthal DA, Puranam P (2023) The dual challenge of search and coordination for organizational adaptation: How structures of influence matter. Organ. Sci. 34(2):851–869.Link, Google Scholar
• Laureiro‐Martínez D, Brusoni S, Canessa N, Zollo M (2015) Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision‐making performance. Strategic Management J. 36(3):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave CA, March JG (1993) An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences (University Press of America, Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
• Lazer D, Friedman A (2007) The network structure of exploration and exploitation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):667–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Mens G, Denrell J (2011) Rational learning and information sampling: On the “naivety” assumption in sampling explanations of judgment biases. Psych. Rev. 118(2):379–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee E, Puranam P (2016) The implementation imperative: Why one should implement even imperfect strategies perfectly. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1529–1546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (2021) Evolutionary Processes and Organizational Adaptation: A Mendelian Perspective on Strategic Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 14(1):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB (1988) First‐mover advantages. Strategic Management J. 9(1):41–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman SA, Rumelt RP (1982) Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell J. Econometrics 13(2)418–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipton ZC (2018) The mythos of model interpretability. Queue 16(3):31–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounamaa PH, March JG (1987) Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Sci. 33(1):107–123.Link, Google Scholar
• Luce RD (1959) Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, MA).Google Scholar
• Manz CC, Sims HP Jr (1981) Vicarious learning: The influence of modeling on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 6(1):105–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1976) The technology of foolishness. March JG, Olsen JP, eds. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Norway), 69–81.Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Mason W, Watts DJ (2012) Collaborative learning in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(3):764–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mastroeni L, Vellucci P, Naldi M (2019) Agent-based models for opinion formation: A bibliographic survey. IEEE Access 7:58836–58848.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
• McGregor J (2006) The struggle to measure performance. Bloomberg Businessweek (January 9), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2006-01-08/the-struggle-to-measure-performance#xj4y7vzkg.Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus JR, DeChurch LA, Jimenez-Rodriguez M, Wildman J, Shuffler M (2011) A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(2):214–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Metcalf L, Askay DA, Rosenberg LB (2019) Keeping humans in the loop: Pooling knowledge through artificial swarm intelligence to improve business decision making. Calif. Management Rev. 61(4):84–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner AS, Haunschild PR (1995) Population-level learning. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behaviour: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, vol. 17 (JAI Press, Stamford, CT), 115–166.Google Scholar
• Mostagir M, Siderius J (2022) Learning in a post-truth world. Management Sci. 68(4):2860–2868.Link, Google Scholar
• Mostagir M, Ozdaglar A, Siderius J (2022) When is society susceptible to manipulation? Management Sci. 68(10):7153–7175.Link, Google Scholar
• Myers CG (2018) Coactive vicarious learning: Toward a relational theory of vicarious learning in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):610–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers CG (2021) Performance benefits of reciprocal vicarious learning in teams. Acad. Management J. 64(3):926–947.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nozick R (1981) Conditions for knowledge. Philosophical Explanations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 172–178.Google Scholar
• Ortiz de Guinea A, Webster J, Staples DS (2012) A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Inform. Management 49(6):301–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osterloh M, Frey BS (2000) Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 11(5):538–550.Link, Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou Y, Bimpikis K, Savva N (2018) Crowdsourcing exploration. Management Sci. 64(4):1727–1746.Link, Google Scholar
• Park S, Puranam P (2021) Self-confirming biased beliefs in organizational “learning by doing”. Complexity 2021:8865872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Aggarwal VA, Posen HE (2022) The aggregation–learning trade-off. Organ. Sci. 33(3):1094–1115.Link, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Chen JS (2013) An advantage of newness: Vicarious learning despite limited absorptive capacity. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1701–1716.Link, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Martignoni D (2018) Revisiting the imitation assumption: Why imitation may increase, rather than decrease, performance heterogeneity. Strategic Management J. 39(5):1350–1369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Lee J, Yi S (2013) The power of imperfect imitation. Strategic Management J. 34(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Yi S, Lee J (2020) A contingency perspective on imitation strategies: When is “benchmarking” ineffective? Strategic Management J. 41(2):198–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P (2018) The Microstructure of Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Swamy M (2016) How initial representations shape coupled learning processes. Organ. Sci. 27(2):323–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Ross JM, Sharapov D (2015) When the leader follows: Avoiding dethronement through imitation. Acad. Management J. 58(3):658–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econometrics 116(2):681–704.Google Scholar
• Samek W, Wiegand T, Müller KR (2017) Explainable artificial intelligence: Understanding, visualizing and interpreting deep learning models. Preprint, submitted August 28, https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.08296.Google Scholar
• Sandvik JJ, Saouma RE, Seegert NT, Stanton CT (2020) Workplace knowledge flows. Quart. J. Econom. 135(3):1635–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Fang C (2014) When hubs forget, lie, and play favorites: Interpersonal network structure, information distortion, and organizational learning. Strategic Management J. 35(7):974–994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwab A (2007) Incremental organizational learning from multilevel information sources: Evidence for cross-level interactions. Organ. Sci. 18(2):233–251.Link, Google Scholar
• Sharapov D, Ross JM (2023) Whom should a leader imitate? Using rivalry‐based imitation to manage strategic risk in changing environments. Strategic Management J. 44(1):311–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrestha YR, Ben-Menahem SM, von Krogh G (2019) Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial Intelligence. Calif. Manage. Rev. 61(4):66–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sommer SC, Bendoly E, Kavadias S (2020) How do you search for the best alternative? Experimental evidence on search strategies to solve complex problems. Management Sci. 66(3):1395–1420.Link, Google Scholar
• Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.Link, Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P (2014) The firm as a coordination system: Evidence from software services offshoring. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1253–1271.Link, Google Scholar
• Sutton RS, Barto AG (2018) Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(2):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor PJ, Russ-Eft DF, Chan DW (2005) A meta-analytic review of behavior modeling training. J. Appl. Psych. 90(4):692–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terlaak A, Gong Y (2008) Vicarious learning and inferential accuracy in adoption processes. Acad. Management Rev. 33(4):846–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE (1985) Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. Res. Organ. Behav. 7(1):297–332.Google Scholar
• Toyokawa W, Kim HR, Kameda T (2014) Human collective intelligence under dual exploration-exploitation dilemmas. PLoS One 9(4):e95789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wisdom TN, Song X, Goldstone RL (2013) Social learning strategies in networked groups. Cogn. Sci. 37(8):1383–1425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yechiam E, Busemeyer JR (2005) Comparison of basic assumptions embedded in learning models for experience-based decision making. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 12(3):387–402.Crossref, Google Scholar