Genes and Sales

References

• Abdellaoui A, Hottenga JJ, Xiao X, Scheet P, Ehli EA, Davies GE, Hudziak JJ, et al. (2013) Association between autozygosity and major depression: Stratification due to religious assortment. Behav. Genet. 43(6):455–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui A, Hugh-Jones D, Yengo L, Kemper KE, Nivard MG, Veul L, Holtz Y, et al. (2019) Genetic correlates of social stratification in Great Britain. Natural Human Behav. 3(12):1332–1342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahearne M (2019) Rethinking marketing: Michael Ahearne. American Marketing Association (July 29, 2020), https://www.ama.org/2019/02/03/rethinking-marketing-michael-ahearne/.Google Scholar
• Anderson CA, Pettersson FH, Clarke GM, Cardon LR, Morris AP, Zondervan KT (2010) Data quality control in genetic case-control association studies. Nature Protocols 5(9):1564–1573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antonakis J, House RJ, Simonton DK (2017) Can super smart leaders suffer from too much of a good thing? The curvilinear effect of intelligence on perceived leadership behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 102(7):1003–1021.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Auton A, Abecasis GR, Altshuler DM, Durbin RM, Abecasis GR, Bentley DR, Chakravarti A, et al. (2015) A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526(7571):68–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Verbeke WJ, Van Den Berg WE, Rietdijk WJ, Dietvorst RC, Worm L (2012) Genetic and neurological foundations of customer orientation: Field and experimental evidence. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 40(5):639–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK (1991) The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personality Psych. 44(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth D, Papageorge NW, Thom K (2020) Genetic endowments and wealth inequality. J. Political Econom. 128(4):1474–1522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beauchamp JP, Cesarini D, Johannesson M, van der Loos MJ, Koellinger PD, Groenen PJ, Fowler JH, et al. (2011) Molecular genetics and economics. J. Econom. Perspective 25(4):57–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belsky DW, Caspi A, Arseneault L, Corcoran DL, Domingue BW, Harris KM, Houts RM, et al. (2019) Genetics and the geography of health, behaviour and attainment. Nature Human Behav. 3(6):576–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belsky DW, Domingue BW, Wedow R, Arseneault L, Boardman JD, Caspi A, Conley D, et al. (2018) Genetic analysis of social-class mobility in five longitudinal studies. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 115(31):E7275–E7284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belsky DW, Moffitt TE, Corcoran DL, Domingue B, Harrington H, Hogan S, Houts R, et al. (2016) The genetics of success: How single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with educational attainment relate to life-course development. Psych. Sci. 27(7):957–972.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin DJ, Cesarini D, Chabris CF, Glaeser EL, Laibson DI (2012) Age, gene/environment susceptibility. The promises and pitfalls of genoeconomics. Annu. Rev. Econom. 4(1):627–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Björklund A, Lindahl M, Plug E (2006) The origins of intergenerational associations: Lessons from Swedish adoption data. Quart. J. Econom. 121(3):999–1028.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonney FL, Williams BC (2009) From products to solutions: The role of salesperson opportunity recognition. Eur. J. Marketing 43(7/8):1032–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown MI, Wai J, Chabris CF (2021) Can you ever be too smart for your own good? Comparing linear and nonlinear effects of cognitive ability on life outcomes. Perspective Psych. Sci. 16(6):1337–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryant BK, Zvonkovic AM, Reynolds P (2006) Parenting in relation to child and adolescent vocational development. J. Vocation Behav. 69(1):149–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Compensation and peer effects in competing sales teams. Management Sci. 60(8):1965–1984.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Chung K (2021) Increasing team performance by sharing success. J. Marketing Res. 58(4):662–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Lim N (2017) How does team composition affect effort in contests? A theoretical and experimental analysis. J. Marketing Res. 54(1):44–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen SF, Dias R, Evans D, Salfati EL, Liu S, Wineinger NE, Torkamani A (2020) Genotype imputation and variability in polygenic risk score estimation. Genome Medicine 12(1):100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi SW, Mak TSH, O’Reilly PF (2020) Tutorial: A guide to performing polygenic risk score analyses. Nature Protocols 15(9):2759–2772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung DJ, Steenburgh T, Sudhir K (2014) Do bonuses enhance sales productivity? A dynamic structural analysis of bonus-based compensation plans. Marketing Sci. 33(2):165–187.Link, Google Scholar
• Churchill GA, Ford NM, Hartley SW, Walker OC (1985) The determinants of salesperson performance: A meta-analysis. J. Marketing Res. 22(2):103–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins FS, Morgan M, Patrinos A (2003) The Human Genome Project: Lessons from large-scale biology. Science 300(5617):286–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and Neo Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) (Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL).Google Scholar
• Daviet R, Nave G, Wind J (2022) Genetic data: Potential uses and misuses in marketing. J. Marketing 86(1):7–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dudbridge F, Gusnanto A (2008) Estimation of significance thresholds for genomewide association scans. Genetics Epidemiology 32(3):227–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39(2):175–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feuk L, Carson AR, Scherer SW (2006) Structural variation in the human genome. Nature Rev. Genetics 7(2):85–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fine S, Nevo B (2008) Too smart for their own good? A study of perceived cognitive overqualification in the workforce. Internat. J. Human Resources Management 19(2):346–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford NM (1983) Research Perspectives on the Performance of Salespeople: Selected Readings (Marketing Science Institute).Google Scholar
• Ford NM, Walker OC, Churchill GA, Hartley SW (1987) Selecting successful salespeople: A meta-analysis of biographical and psychological selection criteria. Rev. Marketing 10:90–131.Google Scholar
• Freedman ML, Reich D, Penney KL, McDonald GJ, Mignault AA, Patterson N, Gabriel SB, et al. (2004) Assessing the impact of population stratification on genetic association studies. Nature Genetics 36(4):388–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman NP, Banich MT, Keller MC (2021) Twin studies to GWAS: There and back again. Trends Cognitive Sci. 25(10):855–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilly A, Southam L, Suveges D, Kuchenbaecker K, Moore R, Melloni GE, Hatzikotoulas K, et al. (2019) Very low-depth whole-genome sequencing in complex trait association studies. Bioinformatics 35(15):2555–2561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Given LM (2008) The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (Sage Publications).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grégoire DA, Barr PS, Shepherd DA (2010) Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: The role of structural alignment. Organ. Sci. 21(2):413–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Harden KP, Koellinger PD (2020) Using genetics for social science. Nature Human Behav. 4(6):1–10.Google Scholar
• Holland JL (1997) Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (Psychological Assessment Resources).Google Scholar
• Homburger JR, Neben CL, Mishne G, Zhou AY, Kathiresan S, Khera AV (2019) Low coverage whole genome sequencing enables accurate assessment of common variants and calculation of genome-wide polygenic scores. Genome Medicine 11(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howie BN, Donnelly P, Marchini J (2009) A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genetics 5(6):e1000529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu S, Zhang J, Zhu Y (2022) Zero to one: Sales prospecting with augmented recommendation. Preprint, submitted January 14, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4006841.Google Scholar
• Huang G, Sudhir K (2021) The causal effect of service satisfaction on customer loyalty. Management Sci. 67(1):317–341.Google Scholar
• Hurtz GM, Donovan JJ (2000) Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. J. Appl. Psych. 85(6):869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain S (2012) Self-control and incentives: An analysis of multiperiod quota plans. Marketing Sci. 31(5):855–869.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalra A, Shi M (2001) Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective. Marketing Sci. 20(2):170–193.Link, Google Scholar
• Koellinger PD, Harden KP (2018) Using nature to understand nurture. Science 359(6374):386–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kong A, Thorleifsson G, Frigge ML, Vilhjalmsson BJ, Young AI, Thorgeirsson TE, Benonisdottir S, et al. (2018) The nature of nurture: Effects of parental genotypes. Science 359(6374):424–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont JJ, Martimort D (2002) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JJ, Wedow R, Okbay A, Kong E, Maghzian O, Zacher M, Nguyen-Viet TA, et al. (2018) Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a 1.1-million-person GWAS of educational attainment. Nature Genetics 50(8):1112–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leong SM, Busch PS, John DR (1989) Knowledge bases and salesperson effectiveness: A script-theoretic analysis. J. Marketing Res. 26(2):164–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lervåg A, Hulme C (2009) Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psych. Sci. 20(8):1040–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim N, Ahearne MJ, Ham SH (2009) Designing sales contests: Does the prize structure matter? J. Marketing Res. 46(3):356–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo MT, Hinds DA, Tung JY, Franz C, Fan CC, Wang Y, Smeland OB, et al. (2017) Genome-wide analyses for personality traits identify six genomic loci and show correlations with psychiatric disorders. Nature Genetics 49(1):152–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loveland JM, Lounsbury JW, Park SH, Jackson DW (2015) Are salespeople born or made? Biology, personality, and the career satisfaction of salespeople. J. Bus. Industry Marketing 30(2):233–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madole JW, Harden KP (2022) Building causal knowledge in behavior genetics. Behav. Brain Sci., ePub ahead of print May 5, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22000681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, McCarthy MI, et al. (2009) Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461(7265):747–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marchini J, Howie B (2010) Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies. Nature Rev. Genetics 11(7):499–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marees AT, de Kluiver H, Stringer S, Vorspan F, Curis E, Marie-Claire C, Derks EM (2018) A tutorial on conducting genome-wide association studies: Quality control and statistical analysis. Internat. J. Methods Psychiatry Res. 27(2):e1608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marjoram P, Zubair A, Nuzhdin SV (2014) Post-GWAS: Where next? More samples, more SNPs or more biology? Heredity 112(1):79–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer D, Greenberg HM (1964) What makes a good salesman. Harvard Bus. Rev. 42(4):119–125.Google Scholar
• Nagel M, Jansen PR, Stringer S, Watanabe K, de Leeuw CA, Bryois J, Savage JE, et al. (2018) Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism in 449,484 individuals identifies novel genetic loci and pathways. Nature Genetics 50(7):920–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nofal AM, Nicolaou N, Symeonidou N, Shane S (2018) Biology and management: A review, critique, and research agenda. J. Management 44(1):7–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novembre J, Stephens M (2008) Interpreting principal component analyses of spatial population genetic variation. Nat. Genet. 40(5):646–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okbay A, Beauchamp JP, Fontana MA, Lee JJ, Pers TH, Rietveld CA, Turley P, et al. (2016) Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature 533(7604):539–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okbay A, Wu Y, Wang N, Jayashankar H, Bennett M, Nehzati SM, Sidorenko J, et al. (2022) Polygenic prediction of educational attainment within and between families from genome-wide association analyses in 3 million individuals. Nature Genetics 54(4):437–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oren L, Caduri A, Tziner A (2013) Intergenerational occupational transmission: Do offspring walk in the footsteps of mom or dad, or both? J. Vocation Behav. 83(3):551–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papageorge NW, Thom K (2020) Genes, education, and labor market outcomes: Evidence from the health and retirement study. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 18(3):1351–1399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pasaniuc B, Rohland N, McLaren PJ, Garimella K, Zaitlen N, Li H, Gupta N, et al. (2012) Extremely low-coverage sequencing and imputation increases power for genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics 44(6):631–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Periatt JA, LeMay SA, Chakrabarty S (2004) The selling orientation–customer orientation (SOCO) scale: Cross-validation of the revised version. J. Personality Sell. Sales Management 24(1):49–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phocas F (2022) Genotyping, the usefulness of imputation to increase SNP density, and imputation methods and tools. Ahmadi N, Bartholomé J, eds. Genomic Predict. Complex Traits. Methods in Molecular Biology (Springer US, New York), 113–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polderman TJ, Benyamin B, De Leeuw CA, Sullivan PF, Van Bochoven A, Visscher PM, Posthuma D (2015) Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics 47(7):702–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D (2006) Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics 38(8):904–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purcell SM, Wray R, Stone L, Visscher M, O’Donovan C, Sullivan F, Sklar P, et al. (2009) Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Nature 460(7256):748–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao RS, Viswanathan M, John G, Kishore S (2021) Do activity-based incentive plans work? Evidence from a large-scale field intervention. J. Marketing Res. 58(4):686–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietveld CA, Medland SE, Derringer J, Yang J, Esko T, Martin NW, Westra HJ, et al. (2013) GWAS of 126,559 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with educational attainment. Science 340(6139):1467–1471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan L (2017) Ten unmistakable signs you should be in sales. Forbes (July 29, 2020), https://www.forbes.com/sites/lizryan/2017/08/04/ten-unmistakable-signs-you-should-be-in-sales/.Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B (2007) How large are the effects from changes in family environment? A study of Korean American adoptees. Quart. J. Econom. 122(1):119–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salgado JF (1997) The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. J. Appl. Psych. 82(1):30–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shungin D, Winkler TW, Croteau-Chonka DC, Ferreira T, Locke AE, Mägi R, Strawbridge RJ, et al. (2015) New genetic loci link adipose and insulin biology to body fat distribution. Nature 518(7538):187–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sollis E, Mosaku A, Abid A, Buniello A, Cerezo M, Gil L, Groza T, et al. (2023) The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog: Knowledgebase and deposition resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 51(D1):D977–D985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiro RL, Weitz BA (1990) Adaptive selling: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. J. Marketing Res. 27(1):61–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunder S, Kumar V, Goreczny A, Maurer T (2017) Why do salespeople quit? An empirical examination of own and peer effects on salesperson turnover behavior. J. Marketing Res. 54(3):381–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tabor HK, Risch NJ, Myers RM (2002) Candidate-gene approaches for studying complex genetic traits: Practical considerations. Nature Rev. Genetics 3(5):391–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tao L, Liang H, Wen B, Huang T (2022) Between nature and nurture: The genetic overlap between psychological attributes and selection into public service employment. Public Admin. Rev., ePub ahead of print December 8, https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13582.Google Scholar
• Tett RP, Burnett DD (2003) A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 88(3):500–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas RW, Soutar GN, Ryan MM (2001) The selling orientation-customer orientation (SOCO) scale: A proposed short form. J. Personality Sell. Sales Management 21(1):63–69.Google Scholar
• Torgeson JK, Wagner RK, Rashotte CA (1999) Test Review: Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) (Pro-Ed).Google Scholar
• Uffelmann E, Huang QQ, Munung NS, de Vries J, Okada Y, Martin AR, Martin HC, et al. (2021) Genome-wide association studies. Nature Rev. Methods Primer 1(1):59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen EM, Kanterakis A, Deelen P, Kattenberg MV, Slagboom PE, De Bakker PI, Wijmenga C, et al. (2015) Population-specific genotype imputations using minimac or IMPUTE2. Nature Protocols 10(9):1285–1296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verbeke W, Dietz B, Verwaal E (2011) Drivers of sales performance: A contemporary meta-analysis. Have salespeople become knowledge brokers? J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 39(3):407–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verma SS, de Andrade M, Tromp G, Kuivaniemi H, Pugh E, Namjou-Khales B, Mukherjee S, et al. (2014) Imputation and quality control steps for combining multiple genome-wide datasets. Frontiers Genetics 5:370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker OC, Churchill GA, Ford NM (1977) Motivation and performance in industrial selling: Present knowledge and needed research. J. Marketing Res. 14(2):156–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinfurter DJ (2017) Effective sales talent, the elusive dream. Forbes (July 29, 2020), https://www.forbes.com/sites/groupthink/2017/06/21/effective-sales-talent-the-elusive-dream/?sh=4132068d65d7.Google Scholar
• Weitz BA, Sujan H, Sujan M (1986) Knowledge, motivation, and adaptive behavior: A framework for improving selling effectiveness. J. Marketing 50(4):174–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wies S, Bleier A, Edeling A (2023) EXPRESS: Finding Goldilocks influencers: How follower count drives social media engagement. J. Marketing 87(3):383–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wies S, Hoffmann AOI, Aspara J, Pennings JM (2019) Can advertising investments counter the negative impact of shareholder complaints on firm value? J. Marketing 83(4):58–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams C (2017) Sales is not easy: And neither is finding good salespeople. Forbes (July 29, 2020), https://www.forbes.com/sites/courtneywilliams/2017/02/17/sales-is-not-easy-and-neither-is-finding-good-salespeople/?sh=417b3833254a.Google Scholar
• Wood AR, Esko T, Yang J, Vedantam S, Pers TH, Gustafsson S, Chu AY, et al. (2014) Defining the role of common variation in the genomic and biological architecture of adult human height. Nature Genetics 46(11):1173–1186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang L, Shu H, Xi J, Wu H, Yang Z, Li P (2012) Universality of categorical perception deficit in developmental dyslexia: An investigation of Mandarin Chinese tones. J. Child Psych. Psychiatry 53(8):874–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhuang F, Qi Z, Duan K, Xi D, Zhu Y, Zhu H, Xiong H, et al. (2020) A comprehensive survey on transfer learning. Proc. IEEE 109(1):43–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuk O, Hechter E, Sunyaev SR, Lander ES (2012) The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 109(4):1193–1198.Crossref, Google Scholar