Does Q&A Boost Engagement? Health Messaging Experiments in the United States and Ghana

References

• Benartzi S, Beshears J, Milkman KL, Sunstein CR, Thaler RH, Shankar M, Galing S (2017) Should governments invest more in nudging? Psych. Sci. 28(8):1041–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Moe WW, Schweidel DA (2023) What holds attention? Linguistic drivers of engagement. J. Marketing 87(5):793–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergman P, Lasky-Fink J, Rogers T (2020) Simplification and defaults affect adoption and impact of technology, but decision makers do not realize it. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 158:66–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsch S, Pesta BJ, Wiscott R, McDaniel MA (2007) The generation effect: A meta-analytic review. Memory Cognition 35(2):201–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braun M, Schwartz EM (2024) Express: Where a-b testing goes wrong: How divergent delivery affects what online experiments cannot (And can) tell you about how customers respond to advertising. J. Marketing 89(2):71–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braun M, De Langhe B, Puntoni S, Schwartz EM (2024) Leveraging digital advertising platforms for consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 51(1):119–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buyalskaya A, Camerer CF (2020) The neuroeconomics of epistemic curiosity. Current Opinion Behav. Sci. 35:141–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021) Key things to know about COVID-19 vaccines. Retrieved June 1, 2021, https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/index.html.Google Scholar
• Dai W, Luca M (2020) Digitizing disclosure: The case of restaurant hygiene scores. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. 12(2):41–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai H, Saccardo S, Han MA, Roh L, Raja N, Vangala S, Croymans DM (2021) Behavioural nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature 597(7876):404–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Linos E (2022) RCTs to scale: Comprehensive evidence from two nudge units. Econometrica 90(1):81–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Department of Global Communications (2020) ‘Verified’ initiative aims to flood digital space with facts amid COVID-19 crisis. United Nations (May 28), https://www.un.org/en/coronavirus/%E2%80%98verified%E2%80%99-initiative-aims-flood-digital-space-facts-amid-covid-19-crisis.Google Scholar
• Digital Health and Innovation Team (2020) COVID-19 SMS message library. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
• Fishbane A, Ouss A, Shah AK (2020) Behavioral nudges reduce failure to appear for court. Science 370(6517):eabb6591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fricke H, Kalogrides D, Loeb S (2018) It’s too annoying: Who drops out of educational text messaging programs and why. Econom. Lett. 173:39–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghana Statistical Service (2013) 2010 population & housing census: Demographic, social, economic & housing characteristics. Ghana Statistical Service, Accra, Ghana.Google Scholar
• Handel B, Schwartzstein J (2018) Frictions or mental gaps: What’s behind the information we (don’t) use and when do we care? J. Econom. Perspect. 32(1):155–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horn S, Litovsky Y, Loewenstein G (2024) Using curiosity to counter health information avoidance. Soc. Sci. Medicine 340:116383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK, Ruan B (2016) The Pandora effect: The power and peril of curiosity. Psych. Sci. 27(5):659–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inzlicht M, Shenhav A, Olivola CY (2018) The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends Cognitive Sci. 22(4):337–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Luca M, Martin D (2021) Is no news (perceived as) bad news? An experimental investigation of information disclosure. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. 13(2):141–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Luca M, Martin D (2022) Complex disclosure. Management Sci. 68(5):3236–3261.Link, Google Scholar
• John LK, Blunden H, Milkman KL, Foschini L, Tuckfield B (2022) The limits of inconspicuous incentives. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 172:104180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jurica PJ, Shimamura AP (1999) Monitoring item and source information: Evidence for a negative generation effect in source memory. Memory Cognition 27(4):648–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang MJ, Hsu M, Krajbich IM, Loewenstein G, McClure SM, Wang JTY, Camerer CF (2009) The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psych. Sci. 20(8):963–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S, Labroo AA (2011) From inherent value to incentive value: When and why pointless effort enhances consumer preference. J. Consumer Res. 38(4):712–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostyk A, Leonhardt JM, Niculescu M (2021) Processing fluency scale development for consumer research. Internat. J. Market Res. 63(3):353–367.Google Scholar
• Kupor DM, Tormala ZL (2015) Persuasion, interrupted: The effect of momentary interruptions on message processing and persuasion. J. Consumer Res. 42(2):300–315.Google Scholar
• Lasky-Fink J, Robinson CD, Chang HNL, Rogers T (2021) Using behavioral insights to improve school administrative communications: The case of truancy notifications. Ed. Res. 50(7):442–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewey J, Murphy S, Zhang D, Putt ME, Elovitz MA, Riis V, Levine LD (2022) Effectiveness of a text-based gamification intervention to improve physical activity among postpartum individuals with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiology 7(6):591–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA (2024) Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling. Nature 626:491–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G (1994) The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psych. Bull. 116(1):75–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Wojtowicz Z (2025) The economics of attention. J. Econom. Literature, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Prelec D, Shatto C (1998) Hot/cold intrapersonal empathy gaps and the under-prediction of curiosity. Unpublished working paper, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Meta Business Help Center (2025) About A/B testing. Accessed March 2021, https://www.facebook.com/business/help/1738164643098669?id=445653312788501.Google Scholar
• Milkman KL, Gandhi L, Patel MS, Graci HN, Gromet DM, Ho H, Duckworth AL (2022) A 680,000-person megastudy of nudges to encourage vaccination in pharmacies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(6):e2115126119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milkman KL, Patel MS, Gandhi L, Graci HN, Gromet DM, Ho H, Duckworth AL (2021) A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor’s appointment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(20):e2101165118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick ER, Rothbard N (2014) Mandatory fun: Consent, gamification and the impact of games at work. The Wharton School research paper series, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Norton MI, Mochon D, Ariely D (2012) The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. J. Consumer Psych. 22(3):453–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olivola CY, Shafir E (2013) The martyrdom effect: When pain and effort increase prosocial contributions. J. Behav. Decision Making 26(1):91–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patel MS, Small DS, Harrison JD, Fortunato MP, Oon AL, Rareshide CAL, Reh G, et al. (2019) Effectiveness of behaviorally designed gamification interventions with social incentives for increasing physical activity among overweight and obese adults across the United States: The step up randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine 179(12):1624–1632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennycook G, Rand DG (2019) Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188:39–50. [ 29935897]Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennycook G, Epstein Z, Mosleh M, Arechar AA, Eckles D, Rand DG (2021) Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature 592(7855):590–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polman E, Ruttan RL, Peck J (2022) Using curiosity to incentivize the choice of “should” options. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 173:104192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruan B, Hsee CK, Lu ZY (2018) The teasing effect: An underappreciated benefit of creating and resolving an uncertainty. J. Marketing Res. 55(4):556–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarzer R, Satow L (2012) Online intervention engagement predicts smoking cessation. Preventive Medicine 55(3):233–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah AK, Oppenheimer DM (2008) Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psych. Bull. 134(2):207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheeran P, Klein WM, Rothman AJ (2017) Health behavior change: Moving from observation to intervention. Annual Rev. Psych. 68:573–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen L, Fishbach A, Hsee CK (2015) The motivating-uncertainty effect: Uncertainty increases resource investment in the process of reward pursuit. J. Consumer Res. 41(5):1301–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steiner JF, Zeng C, Comer AC, Barrow JC, Langer JN, Steffen DA, Steiner CA (2021) Factors associated with opting out of automated text and telephone messages among adult members of an integrated health care system. JAMA Network Open 4(3):e213479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan AS, Mello S, Hornik RC (2012) A longitudinal study on engagement with dieting information as a predictor of dieting behavior among adults diagnosed with cancer. Patient Ed. Counseling 88(2):305–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wojtowicz Z, Loewenstein G (2020) Curiosity and the economics of attention. Current Opinion Behav. Sci. 35:135–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley K, Fishbach A (2016) For the fun of it: Harnessing immediate rewards to increase persistence in long-term goals. J. Consumer Res. 42(6):952–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang T-M, Maxwell TA (2011) Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Inform. Quart. 28(2):164–175.Crossref, Google Scholar