Evaluating Investments in Asteroid Detection Technologies to Prevent Catastrophic Impacts on Earth

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04948

References

  • Abbas AE (2010) Constructing multiattribute utility functions for decision analysis. INFORMS Tutorials Oper. Res. 62–98.Google Scholar
  • Abbas AE, Bell DE (2011) One-switch independence for multiattribute utility functions. Oper. Res. 59(3):764–771.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas AE, Bell DE (2012) METHODS: One-switch conditions for multiattribute utility functions. Oper. Res. 60(5):1199–1212.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abdellaoui M, Colo P, Hill B (2025) Eliciting multiple prior beliefs. Rev. Econom. Stud.Google Scholar
  • Alvarez LW, Alvarez W, Asaro F, Michel HV (1980) Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction. Science (1979) 208(4448):1095–1108.Google Scholar
  • Baker EJ (1991) Hurricane evacuation behavior. Internat. J. Mass Emerging Disasters 9(2):287–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum SD (2018) Uncertain human consequences in asteroid risk analysis and the global catastrophe threshold. National Hazards 94(2):759–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum SD (2019) Risk–risk tradeoff analysis of nuclear explosives for asteroid deflection. Risk Anal. 39(11):2427–2442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bickel JE (2006) Some determinants of corporate risk aversion. Decision Anal. 3(4):233–251.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blair BR (2003) Decision model for potential asteroid impacts. Research Paper EB560, Decision Analysis, Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.Google Scholar
  • Borgonovo E, Smith CL (2011) A study of interactions in the risk assessment of complex engineering systems: An application to space PSA. Oper. Res. 59(6):1461–1476.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brophy J, Muirhead B (2013) Near-Earth asteroid retrieval mission (ARM) study. Proc. 33rd Internat. Electric Propulsion Conf. (Electric Rocket Propulsion Society, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Bussiere M, Fratzscher M (2008) Low probability, high impact: Policy making and extreme events. J. Policy Modeling 30(1):111–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calla P, Fries D, Welch C (2018) Asteroid mining with small spacecraft and its economic feasibility. Preprint, submitted August 15, https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.05099.Google Scholar
  • Camerer C, Kunreuther H (1989) Decision processes for low probability events: Policy implications. J. Policy Anal. Management 8(4):565–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron TA (2010) Euthanizing the value of a statistical life. Rev. Environment. Econom. Policy 4(2):161–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Canavan GH (1994) Cost and benefit of near-Earth object detection and interception. Canavan GH, Solem JC, Rather JDG, eds. Hazards Due to Comets and Asteroids (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), 1157–1191.Google Scholar
  • Chapman CR (1999) History of the asteroid/comet impact hazard. Working paper, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  • Chapman CR (2004) The hazard of near-Earth asteroid impacts on Earth. Earth Planetary Sci. Lett. 222(1):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chapman CR, Morrison D (1994) Impacts on the Earth by asteroids and comets: Assessing the hazard. Nature 367(6458):33–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen RT, Reilly T (2013) Making Hard Decisions, 3rd ed. (Cengage Learning, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Cochran JK, Bokuniewica HJ, Yager PL (2019) Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • Dana D (2010) Valuing foreign lives and settlements. J. Benefit Cost Anal. 1(1):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Groot R, Brander L, Van Der Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L, Christie M, et al. (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services 1(1):50–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dias L, Morton A, Quigley J (2018) Elicitation: The Science and Art of Structuring Judgment (Springer, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dillon RL, Paté-Cornell ME, Guikema SD (2003) Programmatic risk analysis for critical engineering systems under tight resource constraints. Oper. Res. 51(3):354–370.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dodman D, Hayward B, Pelling M, Broto VC, Chow W, Chu E, Muñoz TA (2022) Cities, settlements and key infrastructure. Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  • Downing JA, Prairie YT, Cole JJ, Duarte CM, Tranvik LJ, Striegl RG, McDowell WH, et al. (2006) The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments. Limnology Oceanography 51(5):2388–2397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duster C (2024) A European spacecraft launches to perform a crash scene investigation on an asteroid. National Public Radio (October 7), https://www.npr.org/2024/10/07/nx-s1-5144223/hera-spacex-asteroid-mission-dimorphos.Google Scholar
  • Dyer JS, Miles RF Jr (1976) An actual application of collective choice theory to the selection of trajectories for the Mariner Jupiter/Saturn 1977 project. Oper. Res. 24(2):220–244.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer JS, Sarin R (1979) Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. 27(4):810–822.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer JS, Smith JE (2021) Innovations in the science and practice of decision analysis: The role of management science. Management Sci. 67(9):5364–5378.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Etner J, Jeleva M, Tallon JM (2012) Decision theory under ambiguity. J. Econom. Survey 26(2):234–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher ML, Jaikumar R (1978) An algorithm for the space-shuttle scheduling problem. Oper. Res. 26(1):166–182.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fletcher KC, Abbas AE (2018) A value measure for public-sector enterprise risk management: A TSA case study. Risk Anal. 38(5):991–1008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2020) Global forest resources assessment 2020—key findings. Report, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  • Foust J (2013) NASA to Congress: Don’t ‘pour money’ into NEO programs. Space Politics (March 20), http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/03/20/nasa-to-congress-dont-pour-money-into-neo-programs/.Google Scholar
  • Foust J (2023) NEO Surveyor launch delayed despite funding boost. Space News (January 26), https://spacenews.com/neo-surveyor-launch-delayed-despite-funding-boost/.Google Scholar
  • Frakt A (2020) Putting a dollar value on life? Governments already do. New York Times (May 11), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/upshot/virus-price-human-life.html.Google Scholar
  • Friedman G (1997) Defense of Earth against large comets and asteroids. Proc. IEEE Aerospace Conf., vol. 4 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 5–29.Google Scholar
  • Garcia K (2025) The chances of an asteroid hitting Earth in 2032 have changed. But what’s the risk, really? The Los Angeles Times (February 19), https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-02-19/the-chances-of-an-asteroid-hitting-earth-in-2032-have-changed-but-whats-the-risk-really.Google Scholar
  • Garshnek V, Morrison D, Burkle FM (2000) The mitigation, management, and survivability of asteroid/comet impact with Earth. Space Policy 16(3):213–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghirardato P, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2004) Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J. Econom. Theory 118(2):133–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • GiveWell (2022) GiveWell’s cost-effectiveness analyses. Accessed February 10, 2023, https://www.givewell.org/how-we-work/our-criteria/cost-effectiveness/cost-effectiveness-models.Google Scholar
  • Government Accountability Office (2020) National Science Foundation: Cost and schedule performance of major facilities construction projects and progress on prior GAO recommendations. Accessed February 10, 2023, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-20-268-highlights.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Gralla E, Shull S, de Weck O (2006) A modeling framework for interplanetary supply chains. Space 2006 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA), 2006–7229.Google Scholar
  • Grav T, Mainzer A, Sonnett S, Lilly E, Spahr T, Masiero J, Cutri R (2020) The NEO surveillance mission (NEOSM) survey simulations. AAS/Division Planetary Sci. Meeting Abstracts 52(6):208–203.Google Scholar
  • Gritzner C, Kahle R (2004) Mitigation technologies and their requirements. Belton MJS, Morgan TH, Samarasinha NH, Yeomans DK, eds. Mitigation of Hazardous Comets and Asteroids (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 167–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gritzner C, Dürfeld K, Kasper J, Fasoulas S (2006) The asteroid and comet impact hazard: Risk assessment and mitigation options. Sci. Nature 93(8):361–373.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Handal J, Surowiec J (2022) NASA confirms DART mission impact changed asteroid’s motion in space. Accessed January 2, 2023, https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-confirms-dart-mission-impact-changed-asteroid-s-motion-in-space.Google Scholar
  • Harris AW, Chodas PW (2021) The population of near-Earth asteroids revisited and updated. Icarus 365:114452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris AW, D’Abramo G (2015) The population of near-Earth asteroids. Icarus 257:302–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heal G, Millner A (2014) Reflections: Uncertainty and decision making in climate change economics. Rev. Environment. Econom. Policy 8(1):120–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hein A, Matheson R, Fries D (2020) A techno-economic analysis of asteroid mining. Acta Astronaut 168:104–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hildebrand AR, Penfield GT, Kring DA, Pilkington M, Camargo Z A, Jacobsen SB, Boynton WV (1991) Chicxulub crater: A possible cretaceous/tertiary boundary impact crater on the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Geology 19(9):867–871.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth R, Kunreuther H (1989) Risk, ambiguity, and insurance. J. Risk Uncertainty 2:5–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard RA (1988) Decision analysis: Practice and promise. Management Sci. 34(6):679–695.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hurlimann A, Moosavi S, Browne GR (2021) Urban planning policy must do more to integrate climate change adaptation and mitigation actions. Land Use Policy 101:105188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hurwicz L (1951) Some specification problems and applications to econometric models. Econometrica 19(3):343–344.Google Scholar
  • Ilut C, Schneider M (2023) Ambiguity. Bachmann R, Topa G, eds. Handbook of Economic Expectations (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 749–777.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Interagency Working Group on Near-Earth Object Impact Threat Emergency Protocols (2021) Report on near-earth object impact threat emergency protocols. Accessed February 10, 2023, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/NEO-Impact-Threat-Protocols-Jan2021.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Jacklin SA (2019) Small-satellite mission failure rates. Technical Memorandum No. TM-2018-220034, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.Google Scholar
  • Jaffray JY (1994) Dynamic decision making with belief functions. Yager R, Fedrizzi M, Kacprzyk J, eds. Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence (John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 331–352.Google Scholar
  • Jaffray JY, Philippe F (1997) On the existence of subjective upper and lower probabilities. Math. Oper. Res. 22(1):165–185.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones A (2021) Russia joins China’s mission to sample an asteroid and study a comet. Accessed January 1, 2025, https://www.space.com/russia-joins-china-asteroid-comet-mission.Google Scholar
  • Jones RL, Slater CT, Moeyens J, Allen L, Axelrod T, Cook K, Petry CE (2018) The large synoptic survey telescope as a near-Earth object discovery machine. Icarus 303:181–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones-Lee M (1974) The value of changes in the probability of death or injury. J. Political Econom. 82(4):835–849.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL (1971) Utility independence and preferences for multiattributed consequences. Oper. Res. 19(4):875–893.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL (1987) An analysis of portfolio of sites to characterize for selecting a nuclear repository. Risk Anal. 7(2):196–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, Gregory RS (2005) Selecting attributes to measure the achievement of objectives. Oper. Res. 53(1):1–11.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, Von Winterfeldt D (2011) A value model for evaluating homeland security decisions. Risk Anal. 31(9):1470–1487.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilpatrick M (2022) China to try and knock asteroid off path with new monitoring and defence system. Accessed Febuary 10, 2023, https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/technology/2022/04/china-to-try-and-knock-asteroid-off-path-with-new-monitoring-and-defence-system.html.Google Scholar
  • Kirkwood CW (2004) Approximating risk aversion in decision analysis applications. Decision Anal. 1(1):51–67.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klibanoff P, Mukerji S, Seo K, Stanca L (2022) Foundations of ambiguity models under symmetry: α-MEU and smooth ambiguity. J. Econom. Theory 199:105202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson S (2007) Current NEO surveys. Proc. Internat. Astronomical Union S236:323–328.Google Scholar
  • Lee RC, Jones TD, Chapman CR (2014) A decision analysis approach for risk management of near-Earth objects. Acta Astronaut 103:362–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemoine D, Traeger CP (2016) Economics of tipping the climate dominoes. Nature Climate Change 6(5):514–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindhjem H, Navrud S, Braathen NA, Biausque V (2011) Valuing mortality risk reductions from environmental, transport, and health policies: A global meta-analysis of stated preference studies. Risk Anal. 31(9):1381–1407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Z, He C, Zhou Y, Wu J (2014) How much of the world’s land has been urbanized, really? A hierarchical framework for avoiding confusion. Landscape Ecology 29:763–771.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Longo G (2007) The Tunguska event. Bobrowsky P, Rickman H, eds. Comet/Asteroid Impacts and Human Society (Springer, Berlin), 369–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mainzer A, Grav T, Bauer J, Conrow T, Cutri RM, Dailey J, Fowler J, et al. (2015) Survey simulations of a new near-Earth asteroid detection system. Astronomy J. 149(5):172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matheson JE, Abbas AE (2005) Utility transversality: A value‐based approach. J. Multi‐Criteria Decision Anal. (Oxford) 13(5–6):229–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maue A (2021) How NASA chooses its missions (and how you can help). Accessed March 2, 2023, https://astrobites.org/2021/11/26/nasa-mission-selection/.Google Scholar
  • Merrick J, McLay L (2010) Is screening cargo containers for smuggled nuclear threats worthwhile? Decision Anal. 7(2):155–171.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison D, Chapman CR, Steel D, Binzel RP (2004) Impacts and the public: Communicating the nature of the impact hazard. Belton MJS, Morgan TH, Samarasinha NH, Yeomans DK, eds. Mitigation of Hazardous Comets and Asteroids (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 353–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mrozek JR, Taylor LO (2002) What determines the value of life? A meta‐analysis. J. Policy Anal. Management 21(2):253–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • NASA (2003) Study to determine the feasibility of extending the search for near Earth objects to smaller limiting diameters. Accessed February 10, 2023, https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/doc/neo_report2003.html.Google Scholar
  • NASA (2007a) Near‐Earth object survey and deflection analysis of alternatives (Report to Congress). Accessed February 10, 2023, https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/doc/neo_report2007.html.Google Scholar
  • NASA (2007b) Near-Earth object survey and deflection study. Accessed February 10, 2023, https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/171331main_NEO_report_march07.pdf.Google Scholar
  • NASA (2017) Update to determine the feasibility of enhancing the search and characterization of NEOs. Accessed February 10, 2023, https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/doc/2017_neo_sdt_final_e-version.pdf.Google Scholar
  • NASA (2021) Planetary Missions Program Office, solar system exploration program. Accessed March 2, 2023, https://www.nasa.gov/planetarymissions/solarsystemexploration.html.Google Scholar
  • NASA (2023) Center for Near-Earth Object Studies, discovery statistics. Accessed February 10, 2023, https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/stats/totals.html.Google Scholar
  • NASA (2024) NASA spinoff issue archive. Accessed January 19, 2025, https://spinoff.nasa.gov/spinoff/archives.Google Scholar
  • NASA (2025) 2024 YR4 facts. Accessed August 1, 2025, https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/asteroids/2024-yr4-facts.Google Scholar
  • National Research Council (2010) Defending Planet Earth: Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • National Research Council (2019) Finding Hazardous Asteroids Using Infrared and Visible Wavelength Telescopes (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Paek SW, de Weck O, Hoffman J, Binzel R, Miller D (2020) Optimization and decision-making framework for multi-staged asteroid deflection campaigns under epistemic uncertainties. Acta Astronaut 167:23–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer AJ, Campbell JA, de Graaff B, Devlin N, Ahmad H, Clarke P, Chen M, et al. (2021) Population norms for quality adjusted life years for the United States of America, China, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Health Econom. 30(8):1950–1977.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parnell G, Conley H, Jackson J, Lehmkuhl L, Andrew J (1998) Foundations 2025: A value model for evaluating future air and space forces. Management Sci. 44(10):1336–1350.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Paté-Cornell ME, Fischbeck PS (1994) Risk management for the tiles of the space shuttle. Interfaces (Providence) 24(1):64–86.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Poag CW (1997) Roadblocks on the kill curve: Testing the Raup hypothesis. Palaios 12(6):582–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posner EA, Sunstein CR (2017) Moral commitments in cost-benefit analysis. Virginia Law Rev. 103:1809–1860.Google Scholar
  • Reinhardt J, Daniels M, Paté-Cornell ME (2014) Probabilistic analysis of asteroid impact risk mitigation programs. Smith C, Paulos T, eds. Proc. Probabilistic Safety Management Conf. (International Association for Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, Honolulu), 1–12.Google Scholar
  • Reinhardt J, Chen X, Liu W, Manchev P, Paté‐Cornell ME (2016) Asteroid risk assessment: A probabilistic approach. Risk Anal. 36(2):244–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Remo JL, Haubold HJ (2001) NEO scientific and policy developments, 1995–2000. Space Policy 17(3):213–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richard SF (1975) Multivariate risk aversion, utility independence and separable utility functions. Management Sci. 22(1):12–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson DK, Gisler GR (2019) Near and far-field hazards of asteroid impacts in oceans. Acta Astronaut 156:262–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson LA, Hammitt JK (2015) Research synthesis and the value per statistical life. Risk Anal. 35(6):1086–1100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson LA, Hammitt JK, O’Keeffe L (2019) Valuing mortality risk reductions in global benefit-cost analysis. J. Benefit Cost Anal. 10(S1):15–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowell A, Wexler L (2014) Valuing foreign lives. Georgia Law Rev. 48(2):499–578.Google Scholar
  • Rubin Observatory (2024) Rubin observatory project schedule. Accessed January 23, 2025, https://www.lsst.org/about/timeline.Google Scholar
  • Rumpf CM, Lewis HG, Atkinson PM (2017) Asteroid impact effects and their immediate hazards for human populations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44(8):3433–3440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryall J (2023) Japan to test technology to destroy ‘small and fast’ asteroid set to collide with Earth. South China Morning Post (December 21), https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/lifestyle-culture/article/3245767/japan-test-technology-destroy-small-and-fast-asteroid-set-collide-earth.Google Scholar
  • Sala OE (2001) Temperate grasslands. Chapin FS, Sala OE, Huber-Sannwald E, eds. Global Biodiversity in a Changing Environment: Scenarios for the 21st Century (Springer, New York), 121–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanchez JP, Colombo C, Vasile M, Radice G (2009) Multicriteria comparison among several mitigation strategies for dangerous near-Earth objects. J. Guided Control. Dynamics 32(1):121–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulte P, Alegret L, Arenillas I, Arz JA, Barton PJ, Bown PR, Willumsen PS (2010) The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Science (1979) 327(5970):1214–1218.Google Scholar
  • Schweickart RL, Jones TD, Von Der Dunk F, Camacho-Lara S (2008) Asteroid threats: A call for global response. Accessed February 10, 2023, https://www.space-explorers.org/resources/Pictures/photos/ATACGR.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Silber EA, ReVelle DO, Brown PG, Edwards WN (2009) An estimate of the terrestrial influx of large meteoroids from infrasonic measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 114(E8).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M (2019) Bridenstine embraces planetary defense, endorses NEOCam. Space Policy (April 19), https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/bridenstine-embraces-planetary-defense-endorses-neocam/.Google Scholar
  • Smith JE, Dyer JS (2021) On (measurable) multiattribute value functions: An expository argument. Decision Anal. (Oxford) 18(4):247–256.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spalding MD, Grenfell AM (1997) New estimates of global and regional coral reef areas. Coral Reefs 16:225–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart MG, Ellingwood BR, Mueller J (2011) Homeland security: A case study in risk aversion for public decision-making. Internat. J. Risk Assessement Management 15(5–6):367–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Talbert T (2017) New report assesses status of detecting near-Earth asteroids. Accessed Febuary 10, 2023, https://www.nasa.gov/feature/new-report-assesses-status-of-detecting-near-earth-asteroids.Google Scholar
  • Taylor P, Rivera-Valentin E, Bonsall A (2021) Ground-based radar for planetary science and planetary defense. Planetary science and astrobiology decadal survey 2023–2032. Bull. Amer. Astronomical Soc. 53(4):White Paper 239.Google Scholar
  • Theobald DM, Kennedy C, Chen B, Oakleaf J, Baruch-Mordo S, Kiesecker J (2020) Earth transformed: Detailed mapping of global human modification from 1990 to 2017. Earth Systems Sci. Data 12:1953–1972.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toon OB, Zahnle K, Morrison D, Turco RP, Covey C (1997) Environmental perturbations caused by the impacts of asteroids and comets. Rev. Geophys. 35(1):41–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsetlin I, Winkler RL (2012) Multiattribute one-switch utility. Management Sci. 58(3):602–605.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Transportation (2023) Departmental guidance on valuation of a statistical life in economic analysis. Accessed February 10, 2023, https://www.transportation.gov/office-policy/transportation-policy/revised-departmental-guidance-on-valuation-of-a-statistical-life-in-economic-analysis.Google Scholar
  • United Nations Environment Programme (2022) Wetlands: The unsung heroes of the planet. Accessed February 14, 2024, https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/wetlands-unsung-heroes-planet.Google Scholar
  • Viscusi WK, Masterman CJ (2017) Income elasticities and global values of a statistical life. J. Benefit Cost Anal. 8(2):226–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D, Fischer GW (1975) Multi-attribute utility theory: Models and assessment procedures. Wendt D, Vlek C, eds. Utility Probability Human Decision Making: Selected Proc. Interdisciplinary Res. Conf. (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht), 47–85.Google Scholar
  • von Winterfeldt D (1980) Additivity and expected utility in risky multiattribute preferences. J. Math. Psychol. 21(1):66–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Voosen P (2019) NASA to build telescope for detecting asteroids that threaten Earth. ScienceInsider (September 23), https://www.science.org/content/article/nasa-build-telescope-detecting-asteroids-threaten-earth. Google Scholar
  • Wakker PP (2010) Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walls MR, Morahan GT, Dyer JS (1995) Decision analysis of exploration opportunities in the onshore US at Phillips Petroleum Company. Interfaces (Providence) 25(6):39–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang F, Lu X, Sanders CJ, Tang J (2019) Tidal wetland resilience to sea level rise increases their carbon sequestration capacity in United States. Nature Comm. 10(1):5434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (2024) Know your ocean. Accessed February 14, 2024, https://www.whoi.edu/know-your-ocean/.Google Scholar
  • Zhang P, Bickel JE (2015) Near-earth asteroids and the value of search. Proc. Industrial Systems Engrg. Res. Conf. (Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers, Norcross, Georgia).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.