Female Leadership and Workplace Climate

References

• Abad FJ, Colom R, Rebollo I, Escorial S (2004) Sex differential item functioning in the Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices: Evidence for bias. Personality Individual Differences 36(6):1459–1470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abel M (2025) Do workers discriminate against female bosses? J. Human Resources 59(2):470–501. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abel M, Buchman D (2024) The effect of manager gender and performance feedback: Experimental evidence from India. Econom. Development Cultural Change 73(1):307–338. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Funk P (2012) Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Sci. 58(2):219–235.Link, Google Scholar
• Adams-Prassl A, Huttunen K, Nix E, Zhang N (2024) Violence against women at work. Quart. J. Econom. 139(2):937–991.Google Scholar
• Adhvaryu A, Howell P, Nyshadham A, Tamayo J (2023) Rapport in organizations: Evidence from fast food. Working paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Alan S, Corekcioglu G, Sutter M (2023) Improving workplace climate in large corporations: A clustered randomized intervention. Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):151–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alan S, Ertac S, Kubilay E, Loranth G (2020) Understanding gender differences in leadership. Econom. J. 130(626):263–289.Google Scholar
• Artz B, Taengnoi S (2016) Do women prefer female bosses? Labour Econom. 42:194–202. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Ferrer R (2017) Gender gaps in performance: Evidence from young lawyers. J. Political Econom. 125(5):1306–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azulai M, Rasul I, Rogger D, Williams M (2020) Can training improve organizational culture? experimental evidence from Ghana’s civil service. Technical report, University College London, London.Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Laschever S (2021) Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagues MF, Esteve-Volart B (2010) Can gender parity break the glass ceiling? Evidence from a repeated randomized experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(4):1301–1328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagues M, Sylos-Labini M, Zinovyeva N (2017) Does the gender composition of scientific committees matter? Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(4):1207–1238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakhiet SFA, Haseeb BWM, Seddieg IF, Cheng H, Lynn R (2015) Sex differences on Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices among 6 to 18 year olds in Sudan. Intelligence 50:10–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S, Jolliffe T, Mortimore C, Robertson M (1997) Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. J. Child Psych. Psychiatry 38(7):813–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I (2001) The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J. Child Psych. Psychiatry 42(2):241–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battaglini M, Harris JM, Patacchini E (2023) Interactions with powerful female colleagues promote diversity in hiring. J. Labor Econom. 41(3):589–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bednar S, Gicheva D (2014) Are female supervisors more female-friendly? Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):370–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Black SE, Jensen S, Lleras-Muney A (2019) Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labour market outcomes in Norway. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):191–239.Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2019) Beliefs about gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(3):739–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borghans L, Heckman JJ, Golsteyn BH, Meijers H (2009) Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(2–3):649–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Born A, Ranehill E, Sandberg A (2022) Gender and willingness to lead: Does the gender composition of teams matter? Rev. Econom. Statist. 104(2):259–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourke J, Titus A, Espedido A (2020) The key to inclusive leadership. Harvard Bus. Rev. 6(3):1–5.Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carli LL (2001) Gender and social influence. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):725–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castro S, Englmaier F, Guadalupe M (2022) Fostering psychological safety in teams: Evidence from an RCT. Preprint, submitted July 3, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4141538.Google Scholar
• Chakraborty P, Serra D (2024) Gender and leadership in organisations: The threat of backlash. Econom. J. 134(660):1401–1430. Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U (2010) Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: An experiment. Econom. Inquiry 48(1):133–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Houser D (2019) When are women willing to lead? The effect of team gender composition and gendered tasks. Leadership Quart. 30(6):101340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Friedman JN, Hilger N, Saez E, Schanzenbach DW, Yagan D (2011) How does your kindergarten classroom affect your earnings? Evidence from project star. Quart. J. Econom. 126(4):1593–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman KB (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1625–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1958) Relational analysis: The study of social organizations with survey methods. Human Organ. 17(4):28–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Court J (1983) Sex differences in performance on raven’s progressive matrices: A review. Alberta J. Educational Res. 29(1):54–74.Google Scholar
• Court JH, Raven JC (1962) Advanced Progressive Matrices (HK Lewis, London).Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cullen Z, Perez-Truglia R (2023) The old boys’ club: Schmoozing and the gender gap. Amer. Econom. Rev. 113(7):1703–1740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deming DJ (2017) The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. Quart. J. Econom. 132(4):1593–1640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dupas P, Modestino AS, Niederle M, Wolfers J, Seminar Dynamics Collective (2021) Gender and the dynamics of economics seminars. NBER Working Paper No. 28494, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Ragins BR (2017) Moving Forward: Positive Relationships at Work as a Research Frontier (Psychology Press, London).Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2008) Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1061–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Gangadharan L, Grossman PJ, Xue N (2021) The gender leadership gap: Insights from experiments. A Research Agenda for Experimental Economics (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 137–162.Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Grimm S, Grothe D, Schindler D, Schudy S (2021) The value of leadership: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Leadership Quart. 36(3):101869.Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econom. Lett. 71(3):397–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R, O’Neill M (2009) Gender differences in beliefs on the returns to effort evidence from the world values survey. J. Human Resources 44(4):858–870.Google Scholar
• Flabbi L, Macis M, Moro A, Schivardi F (2019) Do female executives make a difference? The impact of female leadership on gender gaps and firm performance. Econom. J. 129(622):2390–2423.Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on job entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):122–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friebel G, Heinz M, Hoffman M, Zubanov N (2023) What do employee referral programs do? Measuring the direct and overall effects of a management practice. J. Political Econom. 131(3):633–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furtner NC, Kocher MG, Martinsson P, Matzat D, Wollbrant C (2021) Gender and cooperative preferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 181:39–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giofrè D, Toffalini E, Perugini A, Esposito L, Amoretti G, Geary DC (2024) Sex differences in cognition: A meta-analysis of variance ratios in the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children. Personality Individual Differences 229:112776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman PJ, Eckel C, Komai M, Zhan W (2019) It pays to be a man: Rewards for leaders in a coordination game. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 161:197–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadalupe M, Kinias Z, Schloderer F (2020) Individual identity and organizational identification: Evidence from a field experiment. AEA Papers Proc. 110(May):193–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haeckl S, Rege M (2025) Effects of supportive leadership behaviors on employee satisfaction, engagement, and performance: An experimental field investigation. Management Sci. 71(1):347–365. Abstract, Google Scholar
• Haegele I (2022) The broken rung: Gender and the leadership gap. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Halpern DF, Flores-Mendoza C, Rindermann H (2020) Sex, gender, and intelligence: Does XX = XY for intelligence? Working paper, Keck Graduate Institute, California.Google Scholar
• Heinz M, Jeworrek S, Mertins V, Schumacher H, Sutter M (2020) Measuring the indirect effects of adverse employer behaviour on worker productivity: A field experiment. Econom. J. 130(632):2546–2568.Google Scholar
• Hoffman M, Tadelis S (2021) People management skills, employee attrition, and manager rewards: An empirical analysis. J. Political Econom. 129(1):243–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huddy L, Terkildsen N (1993) Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. Amer. J. Political Sci. 37(1):119–147. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes DJ, Lee A, Tian AW, Newman A, Legood A (2018) Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. Leadership Quart. 29(5):549–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Rubin DB (2015) Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn WA, Barton MA, Fisher CM, Heaphy ED, Reid EM, Rouse ED (2018) The geography of strain: Organizational resilience as a function of intergroup relations. Acad. Management Rev. 43(3):509–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunze A, Miller AR (2017) Women helping women? Evidence from private sector data on workplace hierarchies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(5):769–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurtulus FA, Tomaskovic-Devey D (2012) Do female top managers help women to advance? A panel study using EEO-1 records. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 639(1):173–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawson MA, Martin AE, Huda I, Matz SC (2022) Hiring women into senior leadership positions is associated with a reduction in gender stereotypes in organizational language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(9):e2026443119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Shaw KL, Stanton CT (2015) The value of bosses. J. Labor Econom. 33(4):823–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lordan G, Pischke JS (2022) Does Rosie like riveting? Male and female occupational choices. Economica 89(353):110–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa DA, Miller AR (2011) Chipping away at the glass ceiling: Gender spillovers in corporate leadership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):635–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa DA, Miller AR (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 5(3):136–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mavin S (2008) Queen bees, wannabees and afraid to bees: No more “best enemies” for women in management? British J. Management 19(S1):S75–S84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinsey & Company (2016) Women matter Turkey 2016 - Turkey’s potential for the future: Women in business. Report, McKinsey & Company, New York.Google Scholar
• Mednick S (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psych. Rev. 69(3):220–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minni VML (2024) Making the invisible hand visible: Managers and the allocation of workers to jobs. Working paper, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Illinois.Google Scholar
• Niederle M (2017) A gender agenda: A progress report on competitiveness. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):115–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preece J, Stoddard O (2015) Why women don’t run: Experimental evidence on gender differences in political competition aversion. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 117:296–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon R, Illies JJ (2004) Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. Leadership Quart. 15(1):55–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds MR, Hajovsky DB, Caemmerer JM (2022) The sexes do not differ in general intelligence, but they do in some specifics. Intelligence 92:101651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rickne J, Folke O (2023) Workplace sex composition and appreciation at work. Technical report, Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm.Google Scholar
• Ronchi M, Smith N (2024) Daddy’s girl: Daughters, managerial decisions, and gender inequality. Northwestern University, Kellog School of Management, Illinois.Google Scholar
• Rushton JP, Čvorović J (2009) Data on the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices from four Serbian samples. Personality Individual Differences 46(4):483–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Goldberg A, Manian VG, Potts C (2018) Enculturation trajectories: Language, cultural adaptation, and individual outcomes in organizations. Management Sci. 64(3):1348–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Steen E (2010) On the origin of shared beliefs (and corporate culture). RAND J. Econom. 41(4):617–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waschl NA (2017) Seeing reason: Visuospatial ability, sex differences and the raven’s progressive matrices. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Adelaide School of Psychology, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
• Wolff SB, Pescosolido AT, Druskat VU (2002) Emotional intelligence as the basis of leadership emergence in self-managing teams. Leadership Quart. 13(5):505–522.Crossref, Google Scholar