Directors’ Incentives from Potential Penalties: Evidence from Their Voting

References

• 37 Interactive Entertainment (2020) Annual report.Google Scholar
• Adams RB (2017) Boards, and the directors who sit on them. Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS, eds. The Handbook of the Economics of Corporate Governance, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 291–382.Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2008) Do directors perform for pay? J. Accounting Econom. 46(1):154–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (2010) The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. J. Econom. Literature 48(1):58–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Licht AN, Sagiv L (2011) Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management J. 32(12):1331–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aslett K, Sanderson Z, Godel W, Persily N, Nagler J, Tucker JA (2024) Online searches to evaluate misinformation can increase its perceived veracity. Nature 625(7995):548–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer LM, Ertimur Y, Zhang J (2023) Tainted executives as outside directors. Accounting Rev. 98(7):33–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey M, Cao R, Kuchler T, Stroebel J (2018) The economic effects of social networks: Evidence from the housing market. J. Political Econom. 126(6):2224–2276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker AC, Larcker DF, Wang CCY (2022) How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? J. Financial Econom. 144(2):370–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu S, Liang Y (2019) Director–liability–reduction laws and conditional conservatism. J. Accounting Res. 57(4):889–917.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck T, Levine R, Levkov A (2010) Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States. J. Finance 65(5):1637–1667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. J. Political Econom. 76(2):169–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beneish MD, Lu K, Wang Z, Yang J (2025) Director shelter in a storm: Firm actions, misreporting risk, and the voice-exit dynamic. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1998) Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econom. Perspect. 12(3):151–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JL, Drake KD (2014) Network ties among low-tax firms. Accounting Rev. 89(2):483–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown AB, Dai J, Zur E (2019) Too busy or well-connected? Evidence from a shock to multiple directorships. Accounting Rev. 94(2):83–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunkanwanicha P, Fan JPH, Wiwattanakantang Y (2013) The value of marriage to family firms. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 48(2):611–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Dhaliwal D, Li Z, Yang YG (2015) Are all independent directors equally informed? Evidence based on their trading returns and social networks. Management Sci. 61(4):795–813.Link, Google Scholar
• China (2013) Company Law.Google Scholar
• China (2019) Securities Law.Google Scholar
• China Securities Regulatory Commission (2004) Code No. 2 of public company disclosure, format and content of annual report.Google Scholar
• Chiu P-C, Teoh SH, Tian F (2013) Board interlocks and earnings management contagion. Accounting Rev. 88(3):915–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury P, Khanna T, Sevcenko V (2023) Firm-induced migration paths and strategic human-capital outcomes. Management Sci. 69(1):419–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Chung C-N, Lee Z-R, Zhu H (2021) Resource extension and status identity: Marriage ties among family business groups in an emerging economy. Amer. J. Sociol. 127(3):904–949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark, Zucker (2024).Google Scholar
• Clarke DC (2006) The independent director in Chinese corporate governance. Delaware J. Corporate Law 31:125–228. Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy C (2008) The small world of investing: Board connections and mutual fund returns. J. Political Econom. 116(5):951–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Acunto F, Weber M, Xie J (2025) Punish one, teach a hundred: The sobering effect of peer punishment on the unpunished. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print November 17, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03309.Google Scholar
• Dai H, Saccardo S, Han MA, Roh L, Raja N, Vangala S, Modi H, Pandya S, Sloyan M, Croymans DM (2021) Behavioural nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature 597(7876):404–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S (2009) Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):315–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding X, Kang Y, Wang F (2025) Penalties for information disclosure violations and independent directors’ dissenting behaviors at director-interlocked firms: Spillover effects through director networks. Eur. Accounting Rev. 34(3):1173–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dou Y (2017) Leaving before bad times: Does the labor market penalize preemptive director resignations? J. Accounting Econom. 63(2–3):161–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dragusanu R, Montero E, Nunn N (2022) The effects of Fair Trade certification: Evidence from coffee producers in Costa Rica. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 20(4):1743–1790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fich EM, Shivdasani A (2006) Are busy boards effective monitors? J. Finance 61(2):689–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fos V, Li K, Tsoutsoura M (2018) Do director elections matter? Rev. Financial Stud. 31(4):1499–1531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuchs F, Füss R, Jenkinson T, Morkoetter S (2021) Winning a deal in private equity: Do educational ties matter? J. Corporate Finance 66:101740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambacorta L, Gambacorta R, Mihet R (2023) FinTech, investor sophistication, and financial portfolio choices. Rev. Corp. Finance Stud. 12(4):834–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giannetti M, Liao G, Yu X (2015) The brain gain of corporate boards: Evidence from China. J. Finance 70(4):1629–1682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econom. 225(2):254–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gow ID, Wahid AS, Yu G (2018) Managing reputation: Evidence from biographies of corporate directors. J. Accounting Econom. 66(2–3):448–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu Z, Li Z, Yang YG, Li G (2019) Friends in need are friends indeed: An analysis of social ties between financial analysts and mutual fund managers. Accounting Rev. 94(1):153–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harford J (2003) Takeover bids and target directors’ incentives: The impact of a bid on directors’ wealth and board seats. J. Financial Econom. 69(1):51–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haushofer J, Lowes S, Musau A, Ndetei D, Nunn N, Poll M, Qian N (2023) Stress, ethnicity, and prosocial behavior. J. Political Econom. Microeconom. 1(2):225–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helland E (2006) Reputational penalties and the merits of class-action securities litigation. J. Law Econom. 49(2):365–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (2003) Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Federal Reserve Bank New York Econom. Policy Rev. 9(1):7–26.Google Scholar
• Hoitash U, Mkrtchyan A (2022) Internal governance and outside directors’ connections to non-director executives. J. Accounting Econom. 73(1):101436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubei Shuanghuan (2003) Announcement of resolutions of the fourth meeting of the fourth board of directors.Google Scholar
• Ishii J, Xuan Y (2014) Acquirer-target social ties and merger outcomes. J. Financial Econom. 112(3):344–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO (2020) The Human Network: How Your Social Position Determines Your Power, Beliefs, and Behaviors (Vintage, New York).Google Scholar
• Jiang F, Kim KA (2020) Corporate governance in China: A survey. Rev. Finance 24(4):733–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Wan H, Zhao S (2016) Reputation concerns of independent directors: Evidence from individual director voting. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(3):655–696.Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Reishus D (1990) Outside directorships and corporate performance. J. Financial Econom. 27(2):389–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lancaster T (2000) The incidental parameter problem since 1948. J. Econom. 95(2):391–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld PF, Merton RK (1954) Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Berger M, Abel CT, Page CH, eds. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (D. Van Nostrand Company, New York), 18.Google Scholar
• Malmendier U (2018) Behavioral corporate finance. Bernheim BD, DellaVigna S, Laibson D, eds. Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 277–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masulis RW, Mobbs S (2014) Independent director incentives: Where do talented directors spend their limited time and energy? J. Financial Econom. 111(2):406–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neyman J, Scott EL (1948) Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica 16(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Proserpio D, Troncoso I, Valsesia F (2021) Does gender matter? The effect of management responses on reviewing behavior. Market Sci. 40(6):1199–1213.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Pursiainen V (2022) Cultural biases in equity analysis. J. Finance 77(1):163–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2024) SEC charges independent director and ex-CEO of Church & Dwight with concealing close friendship with company executive. Accessed October 17, 2024, https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024-161.Google Scholar
• Shanghai Stock Exchange (2004) Shanghai Stock Exchange Stock Listing Rules.Google Scholar
• Shue K (2013) Executive networks and firm policies: Evidence from the random assignment of MBA peers. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(6):1401–1442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith A (1776) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Modern Library, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S (2005) Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. J. Accounting Res. 43(2):291–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun L, Abraham S (2021) Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. J. Econometrics 225(2):175–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Thompson SC (1982) Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect. Psych. Rev. 89(2):155–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psych. 5(2):207–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang K, Yu X, Zhang B (2023) Panda games: Corporate disclosure in the eclipse of search. Management Sci. 69(6):3263–3284.Link, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Yonker SE (2017) Do managers give hometown labor an edge? Rev. Financial Stud. 30(10):3581–3604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang S (2021) Directors’ career concerns: Evidence from proxy contests and board interlocks. J. Financial Econom. 140(3):894–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang R (2022) Language commonality and sell-side information production. Management Sci. 68(6):4435–4453.Link, Google Scholar