Retargeting Social Media Outreach for SNAP Take-Up

References

• Aggarwal M, Allen J, Coppock A, Frankowski D, Messing S, Zhang K, Barnes J, Beasley A, Hantman H, Zheng S (2023) A 2 million-person, campaign-wide field experiment shows how digital advertising affects voter turnout. Nature Human Behav. 7(3):332–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armour P (2018) The role of information in disability insurance application: An analysis of the social security statement phase-in. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 10(3):1–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr A, Turner S (2018) A letter and encouragement: Does information increase postsecondary enrollment of UI recipients? Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 10(3):42–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettinger EP, Long BT, Oreopoulos P, Sanbonmatsu L (2012) The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1205–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava S, Manoli D (2015) Psychological frictions and the incomplete take-up of social benefits: Evidence from an IRS field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(11):3489–3529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blake T, Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) Consumer heterogeneity and paid search effectiveness: A large-scale field experiment. Econometrica 83(1):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleier A, Eisenbeiss M (2015) Personalized online advertising effectiveness: The interplay of what, when, and where. Marketing Sci. 34(5):669–688.Link, Google Scholar
• Currie J (2006) The take up of social benefits. Auerbach A, Card D, Quigley J, eds. Poverty, the Distribution of Income, and Public Policy (Russell Sage, New York), 80–148.Google Scholar
• Daponte BO, Sanders S, Taylor L (1999) Why Do low-income households not use food stamps? Evidence from an experiment. J. Human Resources 34(3):612–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deshpande M, Li Y (2019) Who is screened out? Application costs and the targeting of disability programs. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 11(4):213–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckles D, Gordon BR, Johnson GA (2018) Field studies of psychologically targeted ads face threats to internal validity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(23):E5254–E5255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein A, Notowidigdo MJ (2019) Take-up and targeting: Experimental evidence from SNAP. Quart. J. Econom. 134(3):1505–1556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giannella E, Homonoff T, Rino G, Somerville J (2023) Administrative burden and procedural denials: Experimental evidence from SNAP. NBER Working Paper No. 31239, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Giannella E, Homonoff T, Rino G, Somerville J (2024) Administrative burden and procedural denials: Experimental evidence from SNAP. AEJ: Econom. Policy 16(4):316–340. Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011) Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):389–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Guyton JL, Manoli DS, Schafer B, Sebastiani M (2017) Reminders & recidivism: Evidence from tax filing & EITC participation among low-income nonfilers. AER P&P: AER. 107(5):471–475.Google Scholar
• Ho L, Breza E, Banerjee A, Chandrasekhar AG, Stanford FC, Fior R, Goldsmith-Pinkham P, et al. (2023) The impact of large-scale social media advertising campaigns on COVID-19 vaccination: Evidence from two randomized controlled trials. AEA Papers Proc. 113:653–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoban PR, Bucklin RE (2015) Effects of internet display advertising in the purchase funnel: Model-based insights from a randomized field experiment. J. Marketing Res. 52(3):375–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalla JL, Broockman DE (2018) The minimal persuasive effects of campaign contact in general elections: Evidence from 49 field experiments. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 112(1):148–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalyanam K, McAteer J, Marek J, Hodges J, Lin L (2018) Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick & mortar retail sales: Meta analysis of large scale field experiments on google.com. Quant. Marketing Econom. 16(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker C (2013) When does retargeting work? Information specificity in online advertising. J. Marketing Res. 50(5):561–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Reiley DH (2014) Online ads and offline sales: Measuring the effect of retail advertising via a controlled experiment on Yahoo! Quant. Marketing Econom. 12(3):235–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linos E, Prohofsky A, Ramesh A, Rothstein J, Unrath M (2022) Can nudges increase take-up of the EITC? Evidence from multiple field experiments. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 14(4):432–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manoli DS, Turner N (2014) Nudges and learning: Evidence from informational interventions for low-income taxpayers. NBER Working Paper No. 20718, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Meckel K (2020) Is the cure worse than the disease? Unintended effects of payment reform in a quantity-based transfer program. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(6):1821–1865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moriguchi T, Xiong G, Luo X (2022) Retargeting ads for shopping cart recovery: Online field experiments. 43rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems Digitization Next Generation, ICIS 2022 (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA).Google Scholar
• Rossin-Slater M (2013) WIC in your neighborhood: New evidence on the impacts of geographic access to clinics. J. Public Econom. 102(Supplement C):51–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni NS (2015) Effect of temporal spacing between advertising exposures: Evidence from online field experiments. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(3):203–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni NS, Narayanan S, Kalyanam K (2019) An experimental investigation of the effects of retargeted advertising: The role of frequency and timing. J. Marketing Res. 56(3):401–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schanzenbach D (2009) Experimental Estimates of the Barriers to Food Stamp Enrollment (Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI).Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture (2019) SNAP participation rates by state, all eligible people (FY 2019). Accessed September 12, 2024, https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/snap/state-participation-rates/2019.Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt N, Tuchman A, Shapiro B, Moakler R (2025) Estimating the value of offsite tracking data to advertisers: Evidence from Meta. Marketing Sci. 44(2):268–286.Google Scholar