Female Equity Analysts and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance
References
- (2012) Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Sci. 58(2):219–235.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Rev. Finance 26(6):1315–1344.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American States, 1960-93. Amer. J. Political Sci. 42(1):327–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) New perspectives on gender. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1543–1590.Google Scholar
- (1995) Gender and values. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 60(3):436–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Do investors care about carbon risk? J. Financial Econom. 142(2):517–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Google Scholar
- (2022) Does analyst coverage affect workplace safety? Management Sci. 68(5):3464–3487.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Do analysts and their employers value access to management? Evidence from earnings conference call participation. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 56(3):745–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 135(2):483–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Do analysts matter for governance? Evidence from natural experiments. J. Financial Econom. 115(2):383–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The role of gender in the aggressive questioning of CEOs during earnings conference calls. Accounting Rev. 97(7):79–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Evaluation of machine-learning protocols for technology-assisted review in electronic discovery. Geva S, Trotman A, Bruza P, Sitbon L, Scholer F, eds. Proc. 37th Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 153–162.Google Scholar
- (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Lit. 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The real effects of financial shocks: Evidence from exogenous changes in analyst coverage. J. Finance 68(4):1407–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Burstein J, Doran C, Solorio T, eds. Proc. 2019 Conf. North American Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics Human Language Technologies, vol. 1 (Association for Computational Linguistics, Kerrville, TX), 4171–4186.Google Scholar
- (2014) Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 111(1):158–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. J. Financial Econom. 131(3):693–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Socially responsible firms. J. Financial Econom. 122(2):585–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Common errors: How to (and not to) control for unobserved heterogeneity. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(2):617–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Board gender diversity, corporate innovation, and firm value: International evidence. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 56(1):123–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The relevance to investors of greenhouse gas emission disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Res. 34(2):1265–1297.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) National culture and the value implications of corporate environmental and social performance. J. Corp. Finance 71(1):102–123.Google Scholar
- (2019) Firms’ innovation strategy under the shadow of analyst coverage. J. Financial Econom. 131(2):456–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Analyst career concerns, effort allocation, and firms’ information environment. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(6):2179–2224.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation. J. Financial Econom. 109(3):856–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Does socially responsible investing change firm behavior? Rev. Finance 27(6):2057–2083.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Competition and bias. Quart. J. Econom. 125(4):1683–1725.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) The eco gender gap in boardrooms. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print December 4, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.07730.Google Scholar
- (2013) Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? J. Financial Econom. 108(3):822–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) FinBERT: A large language model approach to extracting information from financial text. Contemporary Accounting Res. 40(2):806–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Evidence on the information content of text in analyst reports. Accounting Rev. 89(6):2151–2180.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Analyst information discovery and interpretation roles: A topic modeling approach. Management Sci. 64(6):2833–2855.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Monitoring and corporate disclosure: Evidence from a natural experiment. J. Financial Econom. 109(2):398–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Political contributions and analyst behavior. Rev. Accounting Stud. 21(1):37–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Analyst coverage and corporate environmental policies. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 59(4):1586–1619.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) The changing politics of American men: Understanding the sources of the gender gap. Amer. J. Political Sci. 43(3):864–887.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Testing asymmetric-information asset pricing models. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(5):1366–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Ask BERT: How regulatory disclosure of transition and physical climate risks affects the CDS term structure. J. Financial Econom. 22(1):1–40.Google Scholar
- (2010) Self-selection and the forecasting abilities of female equity analysts. J. Accounting Res. 48(2):393–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Director gender and mergers and acquisitions. J. Corporate Finance 28(1):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Are women more likely to seek advice than men? Evidence from the boardroom. J. Risk Financial Management 8(1):127–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Measuring corporate culture using machine learning. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(7):3265–3315.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) Gender, competition, and performance: International evidence. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 60(4):1686–1726.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Corporate climate risk: Measurements and responses. Rev. Financial Stud. 37(6):1778–1830.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Measuring readability in financial disclosures. J. Finance 69(4):1643–1671.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Amer. Econom. Rev. Appl. Econom. 5(3):136–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Stewart BM, Tingley D, Lucas C, Leder-Luis J, Kushner Gadarian S, Albertson B, (2014) Structural topic models for open‐ended survey responses. Amer. J. Political Sci. 58(4):1064–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Firm-level climate change exposure. J. Finance 78(3):1449–1498.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89(6):1010–1028.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Female leadership and gender equity: Evidence from plant closure. J. Financial Econom. 117(1):77–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 29(1):24–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Data collection and quality challenges in deep learning: A data-centric AI perspective. VLDB J. 32(4):791–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Analyst coverage and earnings management. J. Financial. Econom. 88(2):245–271. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Data-centric AI: Perspectives and challenges. Shekhar S, Xiong H, Zhou X, eds. Proc. 2023 SIAM Internat. Conf. Data Mining (SDM) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 945–948.Google Scholar

