Waiting for the Right Offer: Laboratory Evidence on How News Affects Bargaining

References

• Anderson ST, Friedman D, Oprea R (2010) Preemption games: Theory and experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1778–1803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Wang X (1995) The relationship between uncertainty, the contract zone, and efficiency in a bargaining experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 27(3):475–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbosa L, Nunes C, Rodrigues A, Sardinha A (2020) Feed-in tariff contract schemes and regulatory uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 287(1):331–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin DJ (2019) Errors in probabilistic reasoning and judgment biases. Bernheim D, DellaVigna S, Laibson D, eds. Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations 2 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 69–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhagwat V, Dam R, Harford J (2016) The real effects of uncertainty on merger activity. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(11):3000–3034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bochet O, Siegenthaler S (2018) Better later than never? An experiment on bargaining under adverse selection. Internat. Econom. Rev. (Philadelphia) 59(2):947–971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bochet O, Khanna M, Siegenthaler S (2024) Beyond dividing the pie: Multi-issue bargaining in the laboratory. Rev. Econom. Stud. 91(1):163–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brogaard J, Nguyen TH, Putnins T, Wu E (2021) What moves stock prices? The role of news, noise, and information. Rev. Financial Stud. 35(9):4341–4386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Reynolds SS (2005) Bounded rationality in laboratory bargaining with asymmetric information. Econom. Theory 25(3):553–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaigneau P, Edmans A, Gottlieb D (2025) A theory of fair CEO pay. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 7(3):306–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coutts A (2019) Good news and bad news are still news: Experimental evidence on belief updating. Experiment. Econom. 22(2):369–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson RTA (1996) Information in ultimatum games: An experimental study. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 30(2):197–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dal Bó P, Fréchette GR (2018) On the determinants of cooperation in infinitely repeated games: A survey. J. Econom. Literature 56(1):60–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daley B, Green B (2020) Bargaining and news. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(2):428–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deneckere R, Liang M-Y (2006) Bargaining with interdependent values. Econometrica 74(5):1309–1364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Descamps A, Massoni S, Page L (2022) Learning to hesitate. Experiment. Econom. 25(1):359–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eil D, Rao JM (2011) The good news-bad news effect: Asymmetric processing of objective information about yourself. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(2):114–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Embrey M, Frechette GR, Lehrer SF (2015) Bargaining and reputation: An experiment on bargaining in the presence of behavioural types. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(2):608–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enke B, Zimmermann F (2019) Correlation neglect in belief formation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):313–332.Google Scholar
• Fanning J, Kloosterman A (2022) A simple experimental test of the coase conjecture: Fairness in dynamic bargaining. RAND J. Econom. 51(1):138–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher URS (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fréchette G, Yuksel S (2017) Infinitely repeated games in the laboratory: Four perspectives on discounting and random termination. Experiment. Econom. 20(2):279–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goller D, Späth M (2024) Good job!’ The impact of positive and negative feedback on performance. Sports Econom. Rev. 8:100045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grosskopf B, Rentschler L, Sarin R (2018) An experiment on first-price common-value auctions with asymmetric information structures: The blessed winner. Games Econom. Behav. 109:40–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haggard KS, Howe JS, Lynch AA (2015) Do baths muddy the waters or clear the air? J. Accounting Econom. 59(1):105–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang J, Kessler JB, Niederle M (2024) Fairness concerns are less relevant when agents are less informed. Experiment. Econom. 27(1):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Levin D (1986) The winner’s curse and public information in common value auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):894–920.Google Scholar
• Kalay ALON (2014) International payout policy, information asymmetry, and agency costs. J. Accounting Res. 52(2):457–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keniston D, Larsen BJ, Li S, Prescott JJ, Silveira BS, Yu C (2024) Splitting the difference in incomplete information bargaining: Theory and widespread evidence from the field. Internat. Econom. Rev. (Philadelphia) 65(4):1911–1939.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kisgen DJ, Qian J, Song W (2009) Are fairness opinions fair? The case of mergers and acquisitions. J. Financial Econom. 91(2):179–207.Google Scholar
• Martínez-Marquina A, Niederle M, Vespa E (2019) Failures in contingent reasoning: The role of uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. 190(10):3437–3474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitzkewitz M, Nagel R (1993) Experimental results on ultimatum games with incomplete information. Internat. J. Game Theory 22(2):171–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Müobius MM, Niederle M, Niehaus P, Rosenblat TS (2022) Managing self-confidence: Theory and experimental evidence. Management Sci. 68(11):7793–8514.Link, Google Scholar
• Oprea R, Friedman D, Anderson ST (2009) Learning to wait: A laboratory investigation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(3):1103–1124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Erev I, Zwick R (1995) An experimental study of buyer-seller negotiation with one-sided incomplete information and time discounting. Management Sci. 41(3):377–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Sundali JA, Seale DA (1996) Ultimatums in two-person bargaining with one-sided uncertainty: Demand games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 30(2):173–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds SS (2000) Durable-goods monopoly: Laboratory market and bargaining experiments. RAND J. Econom. 31(2):375–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1995) Bargaining experiments. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 253–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandria S, Schade C, Muβhoffb O, Odening M (2010) Holding on for too long? An experimental study on inertia in entrepreneurs’ and non-entrepreneurs’ disinvestment choices. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 76(1):30–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub PG, Murnighan JK (1995) An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 27(3):345–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vespa E, Wilson AJ (2019) Experimenting with the transition rule in dynamic games. Quant. Econom. 10(4):1825–1849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M, Duffy J, Schram AJHC (2018) An experimental study of bond market pricing. J. Finance 73(4):1857–1892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wittenberg-Moerman R (2008) The role of information asymmetry and financial reporting quality in debt trading: Evidence from the secondary loan market. J. Accounting Econom. 46(2):240–260.Crossref, Google Scholar