Escaping Product Market Rivalry Through Innovation
References
- (2016) Import competition and the great U.S. employment sag of the 2000s. J. Labor Econom. 34(S1):S141–S198.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):701–728.Google Scholar
- (2024) Opposing firm-level responses to the China shock: Output competition versus input supply. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 16(2):249–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Trade with benefits: New insights on competition and innovation. Working paper, The Graduate Institute Geneva, Geneva.Google Scholar
- (2013) Import competition and quality upgrading. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(2):476–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1611–1638.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Patents to products: Product innovation and firm dynamics. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP14692, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Paris.Google Scholar
- (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. Nelson RR, ed. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 609–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Text matching to measure patent similarity. Strategic Management J. 39(1):62–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Natural language processing to identify the creation and impact of new technologies in patent text: Code, data, and new measures. Res. Policy 50(2):104–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(6):2121–2168.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Foreign competition and domestic innovation: Evidence from U.S. patents. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 2(3):357–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? J. Financial Econom. 144(2):370–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Asymmetric information and R&D disclosure: Evidence from scientific publications. Management Sci. 70(2):1052–1069.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) The effect of import competition on product diversification revisited. Strategic Management J. 41(11):2126–2152.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Shielding firm value: Employment protection and process innovation. J. Financial Econom. 146(2):637–664.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Survival of the best fit: Exposure to low-wage countries and the (uneven) growth of U.S. manufacturing plants. J. Internat. Econom. 68(1):219–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The effect of asymmetric information on product market outcomes. J. Financial Econom. 123(2):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(1):87–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Trapped factors and China’s impact on global growth. Econom. J. 131(633):156–191.Google Scholar
- (2017) Import competition and innovation: Evidence from China. Working paper, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
- (2025) Global business networks. J. Financial Econom. 166:104007.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) Generative AI at work. Quart. J. Econom. 140(2):889–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econom. 225(2):200–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Difference-in-differences with a continuous treatment. NBER Working Paper No. 32117, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2021) On “Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity”. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(5):2555–2559.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Internationalization, innovation, and productivity. Grifell-Tatjé E, Lovell CK, Sickles RC, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 437–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs. Quart. J. Econom. 134(3):1405–1454.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Firm innovation under import competition from low-wage countries. World Econom. 47(5):2063–2093.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Industry window dressing. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(12):3354–3393.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. Hall BH, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 129–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Proximity to the frontier, markups, and the response of innovation to foreign competition: Evidence from matched production-innovation surveys in Chile. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 5(1):35–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Labor supply and automation innovation: Evidence from an allocation policy. J. Public Econom. 235:105136.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity. Econom. J. 90(358):266–293.Google Scholar
- (2020) Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2964–2996.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Who is screened out? Application costs and the targeting of disability programs. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 11(4):213–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Escaping import competition in China. J. Internat. Econom. 145:103835.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The rise of process claims: Evidence from a century of U.S. patents. Working paper, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2010) Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from India. Quart. J. Econom. 125(4):1727–1767.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econom. 225(2):254–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Growing out of trouble? Corporate responses to liability risk. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(8):2781–2821.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Globalization and innovation in emerging markets. Amer. Econom. J. Macroeconom. 2(2):194–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) R&D and productivity: The unfinished business. R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 269–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Do index funds monitor? Rev. Financial Stud. 35(1):91–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Redefining financial constraints: A text-based analysis. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(5):1312–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation. J. Political Econom. 124(5):1423–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) U.S.-China innovation competition. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- (2014) Product market threats, payouts, and financial flexibility. J. Finance 69(1):293–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Can innovation help U.S. manufacturing firms escape import competition from China? J. Finance 73(5):2003–2039.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The better you are the stronger it makes you: Evidence on the asymmetric impact of liberalization. J. Development Econom. 99(2):474–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Innovation responses to import competition. Working paper, The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2013) Trade liberalization and embedded institutional reform: Evidence from Chinese exporters. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(6):2169–2195.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1978) On the basic proposition of X-efficiency theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 68(2):328–332.Google Scholar
- (2024) Import competition, quality upgrading, and exporting: Evidence from the Peruvian apparel industry. Rev. Econom. Statist. 106(5):1285–1300.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Import competition from and offshoring to China: A curse or blessing for firms? J. Internat. Econom. 89(1):202–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush: Technology search strategies and competition due to import penetration. Strategic Management J. 42(8):1516–1544.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Product-market competition and resource redeployment in multi-business firms. Strategic Management J. 41(10):1799–1836.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Trade, technology, and productivity: A study of Brazilian manufacturers, 1986-1998. Working paper, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.Google Scholar
- (2002) Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: Evidence from Chilean plants. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(1):245–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) Product differentiation and oligopoly: A network approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 115(4):1170–1225.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(1):435–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) A concordance between ten-digit U.S. harmonized system codes and SIC/NAICS product classes and industries. J. Econom. Soc. Measurement 37(1–2):61–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The surprisingly swift decline of U.S. manufacturing employment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(7):1632–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Resource relatedness, redeployability, and firm value. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1781–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) What determines productivity? Lessons from the dramatic recovery of the U.S. and Canadian iron ore industries following their early 1980s crisis. J. Polit. Econom. 113(3):582–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The impact of trade liberalization on firm productivity and innovation. Innovation Policy Econom. 19:39–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Small innovators: No risk, no return. J. Accounting Econom. 74(1):101492.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Innovation and competitive pressure. J. Indust. Econom. 56(3):419–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Opportunity costs, industry dynamics, and corporate diversification: Evidence from the cardiovascular medical device industry, 1976–2004. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1265–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The impact of emerging market competition on innovation and business strategy: Evidence from Canada. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 181:117–134.Crossref, Google Scholar

