Dynamic Portfolio Selection of NPD Programs Using Marginal Returns

References

• Adler P. S., Mandelbaum A., Nguyen V., Schwerer E. From process to project management: An empirically-developed framework for analyzing product development time. Management Sci. (1995) 41(3):458–484Link, Google Scholar
• Ali A., Kalwani M. U., Kovenock D. Selecting product development projects: Pioneering versus incremental innovation strategies. Management Sci. (1993) 39(3):255–274Link, Google Scholar
• Arthur W. B.Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. (1994) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaujon G. J., Marin S. P., McDonald G. C. Balancing and optimizing a portfolio of R&D projects. Naval Logist. Quart. (2001) 48(1):18–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson B., Sage A. S., Cook G. Emerging technology evaluation methodology: With application to micro-electromechanical systems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1993) 40:114–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsekas D.Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control. (1997) (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D., Nino-Mora J. Restless bandits, linear programming relaxations and a primal-dual index heuristic. Oper. Res. (2000) 48(1):80–90Link, Google Scholar
• Brooks F. P.The Mythical Man Month (1975) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chikte S.Markov Decision Models for Optimal Stochastic Resource Allocation Problems (1977) . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Polytechnic Institute of New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Childs P. D., Triantis A. J. Dynamic investment R&D policies. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1359–1377Link, Google Scholar
• Constantinides G. M., Malliaris A. G., Jarrow R. A., Maksimovic V., Zemba W. T. Portfolio theory. Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science (1995) (Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, Holland) Google Scholar
• Cooper R. G., Edgett S. J., Kleinschmidt E. J.Portfolio Management for New Products (1998) (Perseus Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Dickinson M. W., Thornton A. C., Graves S. Technology portfolio management: Optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2001) 48(4):518–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixit A. K., Pindyck R. S.Investment Under Uncertainty (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox G. E., Baker N. R. Project selection decision ming linked to a dynamic environment. Management Sci. (1985) 31(10):1272–1285Link, Google Scholar
• Fox G. E., Baker N. R., Bryant J. L. Economic models for R and D project selection in the presence of project interactions. Management Sci. (1984) 30(7):890–904Link, Google Scholar
• Gittins J. C., Jones D. M. A dynamic allocation index for the sequential design of experiments. Progress Statist. Eur. Meeting Statist. (1972) (Budapest, Hungary) Google Scholar
• Gupta D. K., Mandacovic T., Kocaogly D. F. Contemporary approaches to R&D project selection, a literature survey. Management of R&D and Engineering. (1992) (Elsevier Publishers)67–86Google Scholar
• Huchzermeier A., Loch C. H. Project management under risk. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):85–101Link, Google Scholar
• Kavadias S. K., Loch C. H. Dynamic prioritization of projects at a scarce resource. (2001) . INSEAD working paper, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Kavadias S. K., Loch C. H., Tapper U. A. S. When to use marginal benefits to maximize portfolio value. (2001) . INSEAD working paper, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Liberatore M. J., Titus G. J. The practice of management science in R&D project management. Management Sci. (1983) 29(8):962–974Link, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Huberman B. A punctuated-equilibrium model of technology diffusion. Management Sci. (1999) 45(2):160–177Link, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Pich M. T., Urbschat M., Terwiesch C. Selecting R&D projects at BMW: A case study of adopting mathematical programming models. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2001) 48(1):70–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. C. Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1969) 51(8):247–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nobeoka K., Cusumano M. A. Multiproject strategy and sales growth: The benefits of rapidd esign transfer in New Product Development. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(3):169–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prastacos G. P. Optimal sequential investment decisions under conditions of uncertainty. Management Sci. (1981) 29(1):118–134Link, Google Scholar
• Roussel P. A., Saad K. M., Erickson T. J.3rd Generation R&D (1991) (HarvardBusiness School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Samuelson P. A. Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1969) 51(1):215–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt R. L. A model for R&D project selection with combined benefit, outcome andr esource interactions. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1993) 40(4):403–410Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt R. L., Freeland J. R. Recent progress in modeling R&D project-selection processes. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1992) 39(3):239–246Google Scholar
• Souder W. E. Analytical effectiveness of mathematical models for R&D project selection. Management Sci. (1973) 19:907–923Link, Google Scholar
• Wheelwright S. C., Clark K. B.Revolutionizing New Product Development (1992) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Whittle P. Multi-armedband its and the Gittins' index. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. (1980) 42(2):143–149Google Scholar