New Product Innovation with Multiple Features and Technology Constraints

References

• Ander R., Levinthal D. Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):611–628Link, Google Scholar
• Aghion P., Howitt P. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica (1992) 60:323–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balcer Y., Lippman S. A. Technological expectations and adoption of improved technology. J. Econom. Theory (1984) 34:292–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus B. Optimal dynamic policies for product and process innovation. J. Oper. Management (1995) 12:173–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus B., Jain S., Rao A. G. Too little, too early: Introduction timing and new product performance in the personal digital assistant industry. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34:50–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus B. Speed-to-market and new product performance tradeoffs. J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15:485–497Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bossong-Martines E.Standard and Poor's Industry Surveys. (2000) (Mc.Graw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Chandy R. K., Tellis G. J. Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of the willingness to cannibalize. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 15:304–321Google Scholar
• Chatterjee R., Eliashberg J. The innovation diffusion process in a heterogeneous population: A micromodeling approach. Management Sci. (1990) 36:1057–1079Link, Google Scholar
• Clark K. B., Fujimoto R.Product Development Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Cohen M. A., Eliashberg J., Ho T. Erratum: New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Sci. (1996a) 42:1753–1755Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. A., Eliashberg J., Ho T. New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Sci. (1996b) 42:173–186Link, Google Scholar
• Dutta P. K., Lach S., Rustichini A. Better late than early: Vertical differentiation in the adoption of a new technology. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1995) 4:563–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J. Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1984) 52:383–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin A. The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34:24–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman G. M., Helpman E. Quality ladders and product cycles. Quart. J. Econom (1991a) 106:557–586Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman G. M., Helpman E. Quality ladders and the theory of growth. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1991b) 58:43–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heil S., Peck T.Encyclopedia of American Industries (1998) 12nd ed.(Gale, Detroit, MI) Google Scholar
• Hendricks K. Reputations in the adoption of a new technology. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1992) 10:663–677Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamien M., Schwartz N.Market Structure and Innovation (1982) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Lambe C., Spekman R. E. Alliance, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change. J. Product Innovation Management (1997) 14:102–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn G. S. New product team learning: Developing and profiting from your knowledge capital. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(4):74–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn G. S., Morone J., Paulson A. Marketing and discontinuous innovation: Probe and learn process. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(3):8–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCardle K. F. Information acquisition and the adoption of new technology. Management Sci. (1985) 31:1372–1389Link, Google Scholar
• Pisano G. BMW: The 7-Series project. (1992) . Harvard Business School Case Study No. 9-692-083, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Reinganum J. F. On the diffusion of new technology: A gametheoretic approach. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1981) 48:395–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinganum J. F. Strategic search theory. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1982) 73:741–748Google Scholar
• Reinganum J. F. The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) (Elsevier Science, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segerstrom P., Anant T. C. A., Dinopoulos E. A Schumpetarian model of the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 80:1077–1091Google Scholar
• Tardiff J.U.S. Industry Profiles: The Leading 100 (1998) 2nd ed.(Gale, Detroit, MI) Google Scholar
• Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization. (1990) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Veryzer R. Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process. J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15:151–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward S., Goldstine Light, J. What high-tech managers need to know about brands. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(4):85–95Google Scholar