Deconstructing the Pioneer's Advantage: Examining Vintage Effects and Consumer Valuations of Quality and Variety

References

• Aaker David A., Jacobson Robert. The financial information content of perceived quality. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(May):191–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ailawadi Kusum L., Lehmann Donald R., Neslin Scott A. Market response to a major policy change in the marketing mix: Learning from Procter & Gamble's value pricing strategy. J. Marketing (2001) 65(January):44–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari Asim, Economides Nicholas, Ghosh Avijit. Competitive positioning in markets with nonuniform preferences. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(3):248–273Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow Kenneth. The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1962) 29:153–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• d'Aspremont Claude, Gabszewicz J. Jaskold, Thisse J.-F. On Hotelling's “stability in competition”. Econometrica (1979) 47(September):1145–1150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bahk Byong-Hyong, Gort Michael. Decomposing learning by doing in new plants. J. Political Econom. (1993) 101(4):561–583Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berndt Ernst R., Bui Linda T., Reiley David R., Urban Glen L. Information, marketing, and pricing in the U.S. antiulcer drug market. Amer. Econom. Rev. (Papers Proc.) (1995) 85(2):100–105Google Scholar
• Boulding William, Christen Markus. Sustainable pioneering advantage? Profit implications of the entry timing decision. (2001) . INSEAD working paper 2001/03/MKT, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Bowman Douglas, Hubert Gatignon. Order of entry as a moderator of the effect of the marketing mix on market share. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(3):222–242Link, Google Scholar
• Box George E. P., Jenkins Gwilym M., Reinsel Gregory C.Time Series Analysis: Forecasting & Control (1994) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Brown Christina L., Lattin James M. Investigating the relationship between time in market and pioneering advantage. Management Sci. (1994) 40(October):1361–1369Link, Google Scholar
• Business Week How P&G was brought to a crawl in Japan's diaper market. (1986) October 13):71–74Google Scholar
• Carpenter Gregory S., Nakamoto Kent. Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(August):285–298Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen Clayton M. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Christensen Clayton M., Bower Joseph L. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:197–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen Clayton M., Rosenbloom Richard S. Explaining the attacker's advantage: technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Res. Policy (1995) 24:233–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Consumer Reports Diaper wars. (1998) 63(August):53–55Google Scholar
• Consumer Reports The dirt on detergents. (2000) 65(February):35–37Google Scholar
• Dasgupta Partha, Maskin Eric. The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous economic games, I: Theory. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1986) 53:1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Day George S., Montgomery David B. Diagnosing the experience curve. J. Marketing (1983) 47(Spring):44–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai Preyas S. Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design? Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(3):265–283Link, Google Scholar
• Economides Nicholas. Quality variations and maximal variety differentiation. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. (1989) 19:21–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fershtman Chaim, Mahajan Vijay, Muller Eitan. Market share pioneering advantage: A theoretical approach. Management Sci. (1990) 36(August):900–918Link, Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz Jaskold J., Pepall Lynne, Thisse J.-F.J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40(December):397–416Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat Pankaj. Market incumbency and technological inertia. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(Spring):161–171Link, Google Scholar
• Golder Peter N., Tellis Gerard J. Pioneer advantage: Marketing logic or marketing legend? J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(May):158–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruca Thomas S., Kumar K. Ravi, Sudharshan D. An equilibrium analysis of defensive response to entry using a coupled response function model. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(Fall):348–358Link, Google Scholar
• Hagerty Michael R., Carman James M., Russell Gary J. Estimating elasticities with PIMS data: Methodological issues and substantive implications. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(February):1–9Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen Morten T., Haas Martine R. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic documentation dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R. Competitive price and positioning strategies. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(1):76–91Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Shugan Steven M. Defensive marketing strategies. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(4):319–360Link, Google Scholar
• Hellofs Linda L., Jacobson Robert. Market share and customers' perceptions of quality: When can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality? J. Marketing (1999) 63(1):16–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson Rebecca M. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. Rand J. Econom. (1993) 24(Summer):248–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson Rebecca M., Clark Kim B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(March):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotelling Harold. Stability in competition. Econom. J. (1929) 39(March):41–57Google Scholar
• Huff Lenard C., Robinson William T. The impact of lead-time and years of competitive rivalry on pioneer market share advantages. Management Sci. (1994) 40(October):1370–1377Link, Google Scholar
• Intriligator Michael. Productivity and the embodiment of technical progress. Scandinavian J. Econom. (1992) 94(Supplement):75–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobson Robert, Aaker David A. Is market share all that it's cracked up to be? J. Marketing (1985) 49(Fall):11–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobson Robert, Aaker David A. The strategic role of product quality. J. Marketing (1987) 51(October):31–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johansen Leif. Substitution versus fixed production coefficients in the theory of economic growth. Econometrica (1959) 27:157–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johansen Leif. Production Functions (1972) (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Johnston J.Econometric Methods (1977) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram Gurumurthy, Robinson William T., Urban Glen L. Order of market entry: Established empirical generalizations, emerging empirical generalizations, and future research. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3):G212–G221Link, Google Scholar
• Kardes Frank R., Kalyanaram Gurumurthy. Order-of-entry effects on consumer memory and judgment: An information integration perspective. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(August):343–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kardes Frank R., Kalayanaram Gurumurthy, Chandrashekaran Murali, Dornoff Ronald J. Brand retrieval, consideration set composition, consumer choice, and the pioneering advantage. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20(June):62–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerin Roger A., Varadarajan P. Rajan, Peterson Robert A. First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. J. Marketing (1992) 58(October):33–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroll Mark, Wright Peter, Heiens Richard A. The contribution of product quality to competitive advantage: Impacts on systematic variance and unexplained variance in returns. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(4):375–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane W. J. Product differentiation in a market with endogenous sequential entry. Bell J. Econom. (1980) 11(Spring):237–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leeflang Peter S. H., Wittink Dick R. Competitive reaction versus consumer response: Do managers overreact? Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1996) 13(2):103–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman Marvin B. The learning curve, diffusion, and competitive strategy. Strategic Management J. (1987) 8:441–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman Marvin B., Montgomery David B. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:41–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman Marvin B., Montgomery David B. First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:1111–1125Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLean Richard P., Riordan Michael H. Industry structure with sequential technology choice. J. Econom. Theory (1989) 47(February):1–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore Michael J., Boulding William, Goodstein Ronald C. Pioneering and market share: Is entry time endogenous and does it matter? J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(February):97–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. Sridhar. Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):141–168Link, Google Scholar
• Muthukrishnan A. V. Decision ambiguity and incumbent brand advantage. J. Consumer Res. (1995) 22(June):98–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nakanishi Masao, Cooper Lee G.Market Share Analysis: Evaluating Competitive Marketing Effectiveness (1988) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Narasimhan Chakravarthi, Zhang Z. John. Market entry strategy under firm heterogeneity and asymmetric payoffs. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):313–327Link, Google Scholar
• Neven Damien, Thisse J.-F., Gabszewicz J. J., Richard J.-F., Wolsey L. A. On quality and variety competition. Economic Decision-Making: Games, Econometrics and Optimisation (1990) (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Novshek William. Equilibrium in simple spatial (or differentiated product) models. J. Econom. Theory (1980) 22:313–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parry Mark, Bass Frank M. When to lead or follow? It depends. Marketing Lett. (1990) 1(November):187–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pepall Lynne. Strategic product choice and niche markets. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1992) 1(Summer):397–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prescott Edward C., Visscher Michael. Sequential location among firms with foresight. Bell J. Econom. (1977) 8(Autumn):378–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinganum Jennifer F. Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1983) 73(4):741–748Google Scholar
• Robinson William T. Sources of market pioneer advantages: The case of industrial goods industries. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(February):87–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson William T., Fornell Claes. Sources of market pioneer advantages in consumer goods industries. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(August):305–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee Richard. Product differentiation advantages of pioneering brands. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72(June):349–365Google Scholar
• Schnaars Steven P.Managing Imitation Strategies: How Later Entrants Seize Markets from Pioneers (1994) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Shaked Avner, Sutton John. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49:3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shankar Venkatesh. New product introduction and incumbent response strategies: Their interrelationship and the role of multimarket contact. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(August):327–344Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shankar Venkatesh, Carpenter Gregory S., Krishnamurthi Lakshman. Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(February):54–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M. The learning curve and competition. Bell J. Econom. (1981) 12:49–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton John. Technology and Market Structure (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.) Google Scholar
• Tyagi Rajeev K. Sequential product positioning under differential costs. Management Sci. (2000) 46(July):928–940Link, Google Scholar
• Vandenbosch Mark B., Weinberg Charles B. Product and price competition in a two-dimensional vertical differentiation model. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(2):224–249Link, Google Scholar