Mass Customization vs. Mass Production: Variety and Price Competition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1070.0155

References

  • Alptekinoğlu A. Essays on operations—marketing strategy. (2004) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Alptekinoğlu A., Corbett C. J. Mass customization vs. mass production: Variety and price competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2004) 6(1):98–103Google Scholar
  • Anderson S. P., de Palma A., Thisse J.-F.Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balachander S., Farquhar P. H. Gaining more by stocking less: A competitive analysis of product availability. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(1):3–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balasubramanian S. Mail versus mall: A strategic analysis of competition between direct marketers and conventional retailers. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):181–195LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bayus B. L., Putsis W. P. Product proliferation: An empirical analysis of product line determinants and market outcomes. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(2):137–153LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benjaafar S., Kim J.-S., Vishwanadham N. On the effect of product variety in production-inventory systems. Ann. Oper. Res. (2004) 126(4):71–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry W. L., Cooper M. C. Manufacturing flexibility: Methods for measuring the impact of product variety on performance in process industries. J. Oper. Management (1999) 17(2):163–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani K., Dahan E., Schmidt G. Spackling: Smoothing make-to-order production of custom products with make-to-stock productions of standard items. (2003) . Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  • Champsaur P., Rochet J.-C. Multiproduct duopolists. Econometrica (1989) 57(3):533–557CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y., Iyer G. Research note: Consumer addressability and customized pricing. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(2):197–208LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Groote X. Flexibility and marketing/manufacturing coordination. Internat. J. Production Econom. (1994) 36(2):153–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Groote X., Yucesan E., Kavadias S. The impact of product variety on logistics performance. (2002) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan R., Jing B., Seidmann A. Adoption of Internet-based product customization and pricing strategies. J. Management Inform. Systems (2000) 17(2):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobson G., Yano C. A. Product offering, pricing, and make-to-stock/make-to-order decisions with shared capacity. Production Oper. Management (2002) 11(3):293–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Draganska M., Jain D. C. Consumer preferences and product-line pricing strategies: An empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 25(2):164–174LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eaton B. C., Schmitt N. Flexible manufacturing and market structure. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84(4):875–888Google Scholar
  • Federgruen A., Gallego G., Katalan Z. The effect of product variety on manufacturing performance. (2000) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Feitzinger E., Lee H. L. Mass customization at Hewlett-Packard: The power of postponement. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(1):116–123Google Scholar
  • Fisher M. L., Ittner C. D. The impact of product variety on automobile assembly operations: Empirical evidence and simulation analysis. Management Sci. (1999) 45(6):771–788LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M. L., Jain A., MacDuffie J. P., Bowman E. H., Kogut B. M. Strategies for product variety: Lessons from the auto industry. Redesigning the Firm (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) 116–154Google Scholar
  • Gaur V., Honhon D. Assortment planning and inventory decisions under a locational choice model. Management Sci. (2006) 52(10):1528–1543LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gelman J. R., Salop S. C. Judo economics: Capacity limitation and coupon competition. Bell J. Econom. (1983) 14(2):315–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graitson D. Spatial competition a la Hotelling: A selective survey. J. Indust. Econom. (1982) 31(1–2):11–25Google Scholar
  • Gupta D., Srinivasan M. M. Note: How does product proliferation affect responsiveness? Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):1017–1022LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Shugan S. M. Defensive marketing strategies. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(4):319–360LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heal G. Spatial structure in the retail trade: A study in product differentiation with increasing returns. Bell J. Econom. (1980) 11(2):565–583CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho T.-H., Tang C. S.Product Variety Management: Research Advances (1998) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hotelling H. Stability in competition. Econom. J. (1929) 39(153):41–57Google Scholar
  • Kamenev M. Adidas' high tech footwear. Business Week (2006) November 3). http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/nov2006/id20061103_196323.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Karmarkar U. S., Pitbladdo R. C. Quality, class, and competition. Management Sci. (1997) 43(1):27–39LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kekre S., Srinivasan K. Broader product line: A necessity to achieve success? Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1216–1231LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klemperer P. Equilibrium product lines: Competing head-to-head may be less competitive. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1992) 82(4):740–755Google Scholar
  • Kotha S. Mass customization: Implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:21–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lampel J., Mintzberg H. Customizing customization. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 38(1):21–32Google Scholar
  • Lancaster K. The economics of product variety: A survey. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(3):189–206LinkGoogle Scholar
  • MacDuffie J. P., Sethuraman K., Fisher M. L. Product variety and manufacturing performance: Evidence from the International Automotive Assembly Plant Study. Management Sci. (1996) 42(3):350–371LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mendelson H., Parlakturk A. K. Competitive customization. (2004) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Mendelson H., Parlakturk A. K. Product-line competition: Customization vs. proliferation. (2006) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy K. S. Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):141–168LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moser K., Müller M., Piller F. T. Transforming mass customisation from a marketing instrument to a sustainable business model at Adidas. Internat. J. Mass Customisation (2006) 1(4):463–479Google Scholar
  • Netessine S., Taylor T. A. Product line design and production technology. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(1):101–117LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Norman G., Thisse J.-F. Technology choice and market structure: Strategic aspects of flexible manufacturing. J. Indust. Econom. (1999) XLVII(3):345–372Google Scholar
  • Pine B. J.Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition (1993) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Porteus E. Investing in reduced setups in the EOQ model. Management Sci. (1985) 31(8):998–1010LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ramdas K. Managing product variety: An integrative review and research directions. Production Oper. Management (2003) 12(1):79–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Randall T., Ulrich K. T. Product variety, supply chain structure, and firm performance: Analysis of the U.S. bicycle industry. Management Sci. (2001) 47(12):1588–1604LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Randall T., Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T. User design of customized products. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):268–280LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ratchford B. T. Commentary: Marketing applications of the economics of product variety. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(3):207–211LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Safizadeh M. H., Ritzman L. P., Sharma D., Wood C. An empirical analysis of the product-process matrix. Management Sci. (1996) 42(11):1576–1591LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salop S. C. Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10(1):141–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmalensee R. Entry deterrence in the ready-to-eat breakfast cereal industry. Bell J. Econom. (1978) 9(2):305–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seifert R. W. The “mi adidas” mass customization initiative. (2002) . Case (POM 249), International Institute for Management Development, Lausanne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  • Shaffer G., Zhang Z. J. Competitive one-to-one promotions. Management Sci. (2002) 48(9):1143–1160LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Syam N. B., Kumar N. On customized goods, standard goods, and competition. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):525–537LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Syam N. B., Ruan R., Hess J. D. Customized products: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):569–584LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Teitz M. Locational strategies for competitive systems. J. Regional Sci. (1968) 8(2):135–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thonemann U. W., Bradley J. R. The effect of product variety on supply-chain performance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2002) 143(3):548–569CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tseng M. M., Jiao J., Salvendy G. Mass customization. Handbook of Industrial Engineering (2001) 3rd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) 684–709CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tseng M. M., Piller F. T.The Customer Centric Enterprise: Advances in Mass Customization (2003) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulph D., Vulkan N. E-commerce, mass customization and price discrimination. (2001) . Working paper, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  • van Ryzin G., Mahajan S. On the relationship between inventory costs and variety benefits in retail assortments. Management Sci. (1999) 45(11):1496–1509LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xia N., Rajagopalan S. Standard vs. custom products: Monopoly and competitive models. (2004) . Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Yunes T. H., Napolitano D., Scheller-Wolf A., Tayur S. Building efficient product portfolios at John Deere. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(4):615–629LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zipkin P. The limits of mass customization. Sloan Management Rev. (2001) 42(3):81–89Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.