A Pooling Analysis of Two Simultaneous Online Auctions

References

• Anwar S., McMillan R., Zheng M. L. Bidding behavior in competing auctions: Evidence from eBay. Eur. Econom. Rev. (2006) 50:307–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avery C. Strategic jump bidding in English auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1998) 65:185–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos J. Y. Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Sci. (1997) 43:1676–1692Link, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N., Cohen A. C.Order Statistics and Inference: Estimation Methods (1991) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) Google Scholar
• Balkema A. A., de Haan L. Limit distributions for order statistics II. Theory Probab. Appl. (1978) 23:341–358Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beam C., Segev A. Auctions on the Internet: A field study. (1998) . Working Paper 1032, Haas School of Business, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
• Bulow J., Klemperer P. Auctions versus negotiations. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86:180–194Google Scholar
• Daniel K. D., Hirshleifer D. A theory of costly sequential bidding. (1998) . Working Paper 98028, University of Michigan Business School, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
• David H. A.Order Statistics (1970) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Demange G., Gale D., Sotomayor M. Multi-item auctions. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94:863–872Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G., Fudenberg D. Knife-edge or plateau: When do market models tip? Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118:1249–1278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G., Fudenberg D., Möbius M. Competing auctions. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2004) 2:30–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gul F., Stacchetti E. The English auction with differentiated commodities. J. Econom. Theory (2000) 92:66–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hann I., Terwiesch C. Measuring the frictional costs of online transactions: The case of name-your-own-price channel. Management Sci. (2003) 43:1563–1579Link, Google Scholar
• Isaac R., Salmon T. C., Zillante A. A theory of jump bidding in ascending auctions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 62:144–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson N. L., Kotz S.Continuous Univariate Distributions (1970) 1(John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Kephart J. O., Greenwald A. R., Parsons S., Gmytrasiewicz P. T., Woolridge M. Shopbot economics. Game Theory and Decision Theory in Agent-Based Systems (Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations) (2002) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 119–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P. D. Auction theory: A guide to the literature. J. Econom. Surveys (1999) 13:227–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavi R., Nisan N. Online ascending auctions for gradually expiring items. SODA '05: Proc. 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (2005) Vancouver, British Columbia(SIAM, Philadelphia) 1146–1155Google Scholar
• Lucking-Reiley D. Auctions on the Internet: What's being auctioned and how? J. Indust. Econom. (2000) 48:227–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P. R. Putting auction theory to work: The simultaneous ascending auction. J. Political Econom. (2000) 108:245–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery A. L., Hosanagar K., Krishnan R., Clay K. B. Designing a better shopbot. Management Sci. (2004) 50:189–206Link, Google Scholar
• Pagano M. Trading volume and asset liquidity. Quart. J. Econom. (1989) 104:255–274Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters M., Severinov S. Internet auctions with many traders. J. Econom. Theory (2006) 130:220–245Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinker E., Seidmann A., Vakrat Y. Managing online auctions. Management Sci. (2003) 49:1457–1484Link, Google Scholar