Long-Term Contracts Under the Threat of Supplier Default

References

• Andersson B. GM's global supply footprint. (2006) Presentation, The Supplier Industry in Transition ConferenceApril 19(Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Detroit, MI) Google Scholar
• Archibald T. W., Thomas L. C., Betts J. M., Johnston R. B. Should start-up companies be cautious? Inventory policies which maximise survival probabilities. Management Sci. (2002) 48(9):1161–1174Link, Google Scholar
• Atkins D., Krishnan H., Zhao X. Relational price-only contracts in supply chains. (2005) . Working paper, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Babich V. Dealing with supplier bankruptcy: Costs and benefits of financial subsidies. (2006) . Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
• Babich V., Burnetas A. N., Ritchken P. H. Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007) 9(2):123–146Link, Google Scholar
• Barkholz D., Sherefkin R. Lear left reeling from Dodge Ram snub. Automotive News (2006) 80(6187):1–48Google Scholar
• Barkholz D., Sherefkin R. C&A debacle will cost automakers $665 million. Automotive News (2007) 81(6248):1–47Google Scholar
• Cachon G. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2003) (North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) . Chap. 6Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi T. Y., Hartley J. L. An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. J. Oper. Management (1996) 14:333–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. A., Agrawal N. An analytical comparison of long and short term contracts. IIE Trans. (1999) 31(8):783–796Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. How Chrysler created an American keiretsu. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(4):42–56Google Scholar
• Dyer J., Cho D. S., Chu W. Strategic supplier segmentation: The next “best practice” in supply chain management. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(2):57–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gan X., Sethi S. P., Yan H. Coordination of supply chains with risk-averse agents. Production Oper. Management (2004) 13(2):135–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer P. R., Wu D. J. Integrating long- and short-term contracting via business-to-business exchanges for capital-intensive industries. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1597–1615Link, Google Scholar
• Levy E., Ferazani S. Standard & Poor's industry survey: Autos and auto parts. Standard Poor's (2006) 174(51):1–39Google Scholar
• Lewin T. U.S. suppliers count on Europe for rescue. Automotive News (2006) 80(6199):22DGoogle Scholar
• Li C., Debo L. Strategic dynamic sourcing from competing suppliers: The value of commitment. (2007) . Working Paper E2005E20, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• McMillan J. Managing suppliers: Incentive systems in Japanese and U.S. industry. California Management Rev. (1990) 32:38–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nussel P., Barkholz D. Delphi demands price hikes. Automotive News (2006) 80(6196):1–38Google Scholar
• Plambeck E., Taylor T. Implications of renegotiation for optimal contract flexibility and investment. Management Sci. (2007) 53(12):1872–1886Link, Google Scholar
• Rudambi R., Helper S. The “close but adversarial” model of supplier relations in the U.S. auto industry. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:775–792Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sako M., Helper S. Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automative industry in Japan and the United States. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1998) 34:387–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherefkin R. Ford seeks steel futures market. Automotive News (2006) 81(6228):1–48Google Scholar
• Spence A. M. The learning curve and competition. Bell J. Econom. (1981) 12(1):49–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R., Brush T. H. Supplier performance in vertical alliances: The effects of self-enforcing agreements and enforceable contracts. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):436–452Link, Google Scholar
• Stallkamp T. T.Score! A Better Way to Do Business (2005) (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Swinney R., Cachon G., Netessine S. Capacity investment by competitive start-ups. (2005) . Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
• Tang C. S. Supplier relationship map. Internat. J. Logist.: Res. Appl. (1999) 2(1):39–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor T., Plambeck E. Supply chain relationships and contracts: The impact of repeated interaction on capacity investment and procurement. Management Sci. (2007) 53(10):1577–1593Link, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):639–657Link, Google Scholar
• Tunca T. I., Zenios S. A. Supply auctions and relational contracts for procurement. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) 8(1):43–67Link, Google Scholar
• Wernle B. Suppliers in “shambles,” so why's Ross buying? Automotive News (2006a) 80(6199):28Google Scholar
• Wernle B. Toyota: Supplier-automaker ties need shoring up. Automotive News (2006b) 80(6199):4Google Scholar
• Wynn G. General Motors woes seen causing supply chain cull. Reuters Transportation (2006) January 9Google Scholar