Bounded Rationality in Service Systems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1120.0417

References

  • Afèche P. Incentive-compatible revenue management in queueing systems: Optimal strategic delay and other delay tactics. (2004) . Working paper, University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson SP, de Palma A, Thisse J-F. Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D. The end of rational economics. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2009) 87(7/8):78–84Google Scholar
  • Arkes HR, Hammond KR. Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader (1985) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Bajari P, Hortacsu A. Auction models when bidders make small mistakes: Consequences for theory and estimation. (2001) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P, Hortacsu A. Are structural estimates of auction models reasonable? Evidence from experimental data. J. Political Econom. (2005) 113(4):703–741CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basov S. Monopolistic screening with boundedly rational consumers. Econom. Record (2009) 85(S1):S29–S34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bearden JN, Rapoport A, Seale DA, Rapoport A, Zwick R. Entry times in queues with endogenous arrivals: Dynamics of play on the individual and aggregate levels. Experimental Business Research (2005) II(Springer, Berlin) 201–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bendoly E, Donohue K, Schultz K. Behavioral operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J. Oper. Management (2006) 24(6):737–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bendoly E, Croson R, Goncalves P, Schultz K. Bodies of knowledge for research in behavioral operations. Production Oper. Management (2009) 19(4):434–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cason TN, Reynolds SS. Bounded rationality in laboratory bargaining with asymmetric information. Econom. Theory (2005) 25(3):553–574CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen HC, Friedman JW, Thisse JF. Boundedly rational Nash equilibrium: A probabilistic choice approach. Games Econom. Behav. (1997) 18(1):32–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conlisk J. Why bounded rationality? J. Econom. Literature (1996) 34(2):669–700Google Scholar
  • Davis AM. An experimental investigation of pull contracts. (2011) . Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  • Geigerenzer G, Selten R. Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gino F, Pisano G. Toward a theory of behavioral operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(4):676–691LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree JK, Holt CA, Palfrey TR. Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 104(1):247–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hassin R. Consumer information in markets with random products quality: The case of queues and balking. Econometrica (1986) 54(5):1185–1195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hassin R, Haviv M. To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems (2003) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hey J, Orme C. Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica (1994) 62(6):1291–1326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho T-H, Zhang J. Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Management Sci. (2008) 54(4):686–700LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth R. Judgment and Choice: Psychology of Decision (1980) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hsu VN, Xu SH, Jukic B. Optimal scheduling and incentive compatible pricing for a service system with quality of service guarantees. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(3):375–396LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang T, Allon G, Bassamboo A. (2012) . Technical report to “Bounded rationality in service systems”. http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/operations/workingpapers.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristic and Biases (1981) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Knudsen NC. Individual and social optimization in a multiserver queue with a general cost-benefit structure. Econometrica (1972) 40(3):515–528CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kremer M, Debo L. Herding in a queue: A laboratory experiment. (2012) . Chicago Booth Research Paper 12-28, Chicago Booth School of Business, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  • Kremer M, Moritz B, Siemsen E. Demand forecasting behavior: System neglect and change detection. Management Sci. (2011) 57(10):1827–1843LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Larson RC. Perspectives on queues: Social justice and the psychology of queueing. Oper. Res. (1987) 35(6):895–905LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lim N, Ho T-H. Designing price contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the number of blocks matter? Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):312–326LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman SA, Stidham S. Individual versus social optimization in exponential congestion systems. Oper. Res. (1977) 25(2):233–247LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loomes G, Moffatt P, Sudgen R. A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risky choice. J. Risk Uncertainty (2002) 24(2):103–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luce RD. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (1959) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Maister D, Czepiel JA, Solomon MR, Suprenant C. The psychology of waiting lines. The Service Encounter (1985) (Lexington Books, New York) 113–126Chap. 8Google Scholar
  • Mallard G. Modelling cognitively bounded rationality: An evaluative taxonomy. J. Econom. Surveys (2011) 26(4):674–704CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mattsson L-G, Weibull JW. Probabilistic choice and procedurally bounded rationality. Games Econom. Behav. (2002) 41(1):61–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D, Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics (1974) (Academic Press, New York) 105–142Google Scholar
  • McKelvey RD, Palfrey TR. Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games Econom. Behav. (1995) 10(1):6–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naor P. The regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica (1969) 37(1):15–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nisbett R, Ross L. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings in the Social Judgment (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ. Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. (1992) 43:87–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pitz G, Sachs NJ. Judgment and decision: Theory and application. Annual Rev. Psych. (1984) 35:139–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plambeck EL, Wang Q. Implications of hyperbolic discounting for optimal pricing and information management in service systems. (2010) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Rapoport A, Stein WE, Parco JE, Seale DA. Equilibrium play in single-server queues with endogenously determined arrival times. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2004) 55(1):67–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seale DA, Parco JE, Stein WE, Rapoport A. Joining a queue or staying out: Effects of information structure and service time on arrival and staying out decisions. Experiment. Econom. (2005) 8(2):117–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1955) 69(1):99–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA. Models of Man (1957) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Stahl D, Wilson P. On players' models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games Econom. Behav. (1995) 10(1):218–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Su X. Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(4):566–589LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Talluri KT, van Ryzin GJ. The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management (2004) (Springer-Verlag/Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgment. Psych. Rev. (1927) 34(4):273–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185(4157):1124–1131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Mieghem JA. Price and service discrimination in queuing systems: Incentive compatibility of Gcμ scheduling. Management Sci. (2000) 46(9):1249–1267LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Waksberg A, Smith A, Burd M. Can irrational behaviour maximise fitness? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. (2009) 63(3):461–471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yechiali U. On optimal balking rules and toll charges in a GI/M/1 queuing process. Oper. Res. (1971) 19(2):349–370LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yechiali U. Customers' optimal joining rules for the GI/M/s queue. Management Sci. (1972) 18(7):434–443LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.