Product Design Under Multinomial Logit Choices: Optimization of Quality and Prices in an Evolving Product Line

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0788

References

  • Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akçay Y, Natarajan HP, Xu SH (2010) Joint dynamic pricing of multiple perishable products under consumer choice. Management Sci. 56(8):1345–1361.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allison PD (1977) Testing for interaction in multiple regression. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(1):144–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alptekinoğlu A, Semple JH (2016) The exponomial choice model: A new alternative for assortment and price optimization. Oper. Res. 64(1):79–93.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson SP, De Palma A, Thisse JF (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Apple (2018a) Buy iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max – Apple. Accessed September 15, 2018, https:// www.apple.com/shop/buy–iphone/iphone–xs#00,20,30.Google Scholar
  • Apple (2018b) iPhone – Apple. Accessed August 16, 2018, https://www.apple.com/iphone/.Google Scholar
  • Aydin G, Porteus EL (2008) Joint inventory and pricing decisions for an assortment. Oper. Res. 56(5):1247–1255.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aydin G, Ryan JK (2000) Product line selection and pricing under the multinomial logit choice model. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Belloni A, Freund R, Selove M, Simester D (2008) Optimizing product line designs: Efficient methods and comparisons. Management Sci. 54(9):1544–1552.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry ST (1994) Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J. Econom. 25(2):242–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Mišić VV (2016) Robust product line design. Oper. Res. 65(1):19–37.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon GP, Kök AG (2007) Category management and coordination in retail assortment planning in the presence of basket shopping consumers. Management Sci. 53(6):934–951.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon GP, Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) The impact of consumer search, firm entry and competition on assortment and pricing. Marketing Sci. 27(3):461–473.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter GS, Lehmann DR (1985) A model of marketing mix, brand switching, and competition. J. Marketing Res. 22(3):318–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen KD, Hausman WH (2000) Mathematical properties of the optimal product line selection problem using choice-based conjoint analysis. Management Sci. 46(2):327–332.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crawford GS (2012) Endogenous product choice: A progress report. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 30(3):315–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crawford GS, Shcherbakov O, Shum M (2015) The welfare effects of endogenous quality choice in cable television markets. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Discussion Paper No. DP10793, London.Google Scholar
  • Dobson G, Kalish S (1988) Positioning and pricing a product line. Marketing Sci. 7(2):107–125.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dobson G, Kalish S (1993) Heuristics for pricing and positioning a product-line using conjoint and cost data. Management Sci. 39(2):160–175.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dong L, Kouvelis P, Tian Z (2009) Dynamic pricing and inventory control of substitute products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(2):317–339.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feenstra RC, Levinsohn JA (1995) Estimating markups and market conduct with multidimensional product attributes. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(1):19–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2014) Constrained assortment optimization for the nested logit model. Management Sci. 60(10):2583–2601.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gallego G, Wang R (2014) Multi-product price optimization and competition under the nested logit model with product-differentiated price sensitivities. Oper. Res. 62(2):450–461.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gerstner E (1985) Do higher prices signal higher quality? J. Marketing Res. 22(2):209–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green PE, Krieger AM (1985) Models and heuristics for product line selection. Marketing Sci. 4(1):1–19.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Green PE, Krieger AM (1993) Conjoint analysis with product-positioning applications. Handbooks Oper. Res. Management Sci. 5:467–515.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene DL (1991) Short-run pricing strategies to increase corporate average fuel economy. Econom. Inquiry 29(1):101–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W (2003) Econometric Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Guadagni PM, Little JD (1983) A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. 2(3):203–238.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hagerty MR (1978) Model testing techniques and price-quality tradeoffs. J. Consumer Res. 5(3):194–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hanson W, Martin K (1996) Optimizing multinomial logit profit functions. Management Sci. 42(7):992–1003.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp WJ, Xu X (2005) Product line selection and pricing with modularity in design. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(3):172–187.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Intel (2018) Intel Core i7 Processors. Accessed August 16, 2018, https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/processors/core/i7-processors.html.Google Scholar
  • Keeney RL (1968) Quasi-separable utility functions. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 15(4):551–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim K, Chhajed D (2002) Product design with multiple quality-type attributes. Management Sci. 48(11):1502–1511.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli R, Sukumar R (1990) Heuristics for product-line design using conjoint analysis. Management Sci. 36(12):1464–1478.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kök AG, Fisher ML (2007) Demand estimation and assortment optimization under substitution: Methodology and application. Oper. Res. 55(6):1001–1021.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kök AG, Xu Y (2011) Optimal and competitive assortments with endogenous pricing under hierarchical consumer choice models. Management Sci. 57(9):1546–1563.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kraus UG, Yano CA (2003) Product line selection and pricing under a share-of-surplus choice model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 150(3):653–671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster K (1990) The economics of product variety: A survey. Marketing Sci. 9(3):189–206.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li G, Rusmevichientong P, Topaloglu H (2015) The d-level nested logit model: Assortment and price optimization problems. Oper. Res. 63(2):325–342.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Huh WT (2011) Pricing multiple products with the multinomial logit and nested logit models: Concavity and implications. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(4):549–563.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Webster S (2017) Optimal pricing of correlated product options under the paired combinatorial logit model. Oper. Res. 65(5):1215–1230.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Webster S, Mason N, Kempf K (2019) Product-line pricing under discrete mixed multinomial logit demand. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(1):14–28.Google Scholar
  • Luce RD (1959) Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Luo L, Kannan P, Ratchford BT (2007) New product development under channel acceptance. Marketing Sci. 26(2):149–163.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maddah B, Bish EK (2007) Joint pricing, assortment, and inventory decisions for a retailer’s product line. Naval Res. Logist. 54(3):315–330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marschak J (1959) Binary choice constraints on random utility indicators. Technical report, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  • McBride RD, Zufryden FS (1988) An integer programming approach to the optimal product line selection problem. Marketing Sci. 7(2):126–140.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D (1974) The measurement of urban travel demand. J. Public Econom. 3(4):303–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D (1978) Modelling the choice of residential location. Karlqvist A, Lundqvist L, Snickars F, Weibull J, eds. Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 75–96.Google Scholar
  • McFadden D (1980) Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products. J. Bus. 53(3):S13–S29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D (1986) The choice theory approach to market research. Marketing Sci. 5(4):275–297.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers of Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
  • Monroe KB, Krishnan R (1985) The effect of price on subjective product evaluations. Perceived Quality 1(1):209–232.Google Scholar
  • Moorthy KS (1984) Market segmentation, self-selection, and product line design. Marketing Sci. 3(4):288–307.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morris RT, Bronson CS (1969) The chaos of competition indicated by Consumer Reports. J. Marketing 33(3):26–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagler J (1994) Scobit: An alternative estimator to logit and probit. Amer. J. Political Sci. 38(1):230–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Netessine S, Taylor TA (2007) Product line design and production technology. Marketing Sci. 26(1):101–117.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oren S, Smith S, Wilson R (1984) Pricing a product line. J. Bus. 57(1):S73–S99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pan XA, Honhon D (2012) Assortment planning for vertically differentiated products. Production Oper. Management 21(2):253–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rajan RG, Zingales L (1998) Financial dependence and growth. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(3):559–586.Google Scholar
  • Schön C (2010a) On the optimal product line selection problem with price discrimination. Management Sci. 56(5):896–902.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schön C (2010b) On the product line selection problem under attraction choice models of consumer behavior. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 206(1):260–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siderelis C, Moore R, Lee J-H (2000) Incorporating users’ perceptions of site quality in a recreation travel cost model. J. Leisure Res. 32(4):406–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Small K (1987) A discrete choice model for ordered alternatives. Econometrica 55(2):409–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song JS, Xue Z (2007) Demand management and inventory control for substitutable products. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  • Spence AM (1975) Monopoly, quality, and regulation. Bell J. Econom. 6(2):417–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Talluri K, van Ryzin G (2004) Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Sci. 50(1):15–33.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thurstone LL (1927) A law of comparative judgment. Psych. Rev. 34(4):273–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Train K (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Train KE, McFadden DL, Ben-Akiva M (1987) The demand for local telephone service: A fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choices. RAND J. Econom. 18(1):109–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Villas-Boas JM (1998) Product line design for a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. 17(2):156–169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Vovsha P (1997) Cross-nested logit model: An application to mode choice in the Tel-Aviv metropolitan area. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1607(1):6–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang R (2012) Capacitated assortment and price optimization under the multinomial logit model. Oper. Res. Lett. 40(6):492–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang R, Sahin O (2017) The impact of consumer search cost on assortment planning and pricing. Management Sci. 64(8):3649–3666.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang X, Camm JD, Curry DJ (2009) A branch-and-price approach to the share-of-choice product line design problem. Management Sci. 55(10):1718–1728.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.