Choice Overload and the Long Tail: Consideration Sets and Purchases in Online Platforms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0318

References

  • Alba JW, Hutchinson JW (1987) Dimensions of consumer expertise. J. Consumer Res. 13(4):411–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aouad A, Farias V, Levi R (2021) Assortment optimization under consider-then-choose choice models. Management Sci. 67(6):3368–3386.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aouad A, Feldman J, Segev D, Zhang DJ (2024) The click-based MNL model: A framework for modeling click data in assortment optimization. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print November 25, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.00281.Google Scholar
  • Baumol WJ, Ide EA (1956) Variety in retailing. Management Sci. 3(1):93–101.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J, Draganska M, Simonson I (2007) The influence of product variety on brand perception and choice. Marketing Sci. 26(4):460–472.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boatwright P, Nunes JC (2001) Reducing assortment: An attribute-based approach. J. Marketing 65(3):50–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borle S, Boatwright P, Kadane JB, Nunes JC, Galit S (2005) The effect of product assortment changes on customer retention. Marketing Sci. 24(4):616–622.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Briesch RA, Chintagunta PK, Fox EJ (2009) How does assortment affect grocery store choice? J. Marketing Res. 46(2):176–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broniarczyk SM, Hoyer WD, McAlister L (1998) Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction. J. Marketing Res. 35(2):166–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Hu Y, Simester D (2011) Goodbye Pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Management Sci. 57(8):1373–1386.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen X, Li Z, Ming L, Zhu W (2021) The incentive game under target effects in ridesharing: A structural econometric analysis. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(2):972–992.Google Scholar
  • Chen Y-J, Dai T, Korpeoglu CG, Körpeoğlu E, Sahin O, Tang CS, Xiao S (2020) Om forum—Innovative online platforms: Research opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(3):430–445.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chernev A (2003a) Product assortment and individual decision processes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(1):151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chernev A (2003b) When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. J. Consumer Res. 30(2):170–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chernev A, Bockenholt U, Goodman J (2015) Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. J. Consumer Psych. 25(2):333–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coupey E, Irwin JR, Payne JW (1998) Product category familiarity and preference construction. J. Consumer Res. 24(4):459–468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De los Santos B, Hortaçsu A, Wildenbeest MR (2012) Testing models of consumer search using data on web browsing and purchasing behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2955–2980.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derakhshan M, Golrezaei N, Manshadi V, Mirrokni V (2022) Product ranking on online platforms. Management Sci. 68(6):4024–4041.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Donnelly R, Kanodia A, Morozov I (2023) Welfare effects of personalized rankings. Marketing Sci. 43(1):92–113.Google Scholar
  • Donohue K, Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2020) Behavioral operations: Past, present, and future. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):191–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dreze X, Hoch SJ, Purk ME (1994) Shelf management and space elasticity. J. Retailing 70(4):301–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faber LG, Maurits NM, Lorist MM (2012) Mental fatigue affects visual selective attention. PLoS One 7(10):e48073.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farber HS (2008) Reference-dependent preferences and labor supply: The case of New York City taxi drivers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):1069–1082.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallino S, Moreno A, Stamatopoulos I (2017) Channel integration, sales dispersion, and inventory management. Management Sci. 63(9):2813–2831.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbride TJ, Allenby GM (2004) A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. 23(3):391–406.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greene WH, Hensher DA (2003) A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 37(8):681–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):393–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR, Toubia O, Evgeniou T, Befurt R, Dzyabura D (2010) Disjunctions of conjunctions, cognitive simplicity, and consideration sets. J. Marketing Res. 47(3):485–496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch SJ, Bradlow ET, Wansink B (1999) The variety of an assortment. Marketing Sci. 18(4):527–546.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Instacart (2021) Instacart appoints board member Fidji Simo to chief executive officer. Accessed July 1, 2024, https://www.instacart.com/company/pressreleases/instacart-appoints-board-member-fidji-simo-to-chief-executive-officer-and-announces-founder-and-current-ceo-apoorva-mehta-will-serve-as-executive-chairman-of-the-board/.Google Scholar
  • Instacart (2022) Job openings at Instacart. Accessed October 1, 2024, https://www.instacart.com/company/how-its-made/from-postgres-to-amazon-dynamodb-%ef%bf%bc/.Google Scholar
  • Iyengar SS, Lepper MR (2000) When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 79(6):995.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacoby J (1977) Information load and decision quality: Some contested issues. J. Marketing Res. 14(4):569–573.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson EJ, Payne JW (1985) Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Sci. 31(4):395–414.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson EJ, Russo JE (1984) Product familiarity and learning new information. J. Consumer Res. 11(1):542–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamenica E (2008) Contextual inference in markets: On the informational content of product lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(5):2127–2149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, Netessine S (2020) Higher market thickness reduces matching rate in online platforms: Evidence from a quasiexperiment. Management Sci. 66(1):271–289.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y, Cooper WL, Wang Z (2019) Information provision and pricing in the presence of consumer search costs. Production Oper. Management 28(7):1603–1620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martinez-de Albeniz V, Aparicio D, Balsach J (2024) The resilience of fashion retail stores. Production Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2003) Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. 22(1):58–84.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moe WW (2006) An empirical two-stage choice model with varying decision rules applied to Internet clickstream data. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):680–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mogilner C, Rudnick T, Iyengar SS (2008) The mere categorization effect: How the presence of categories increases choosers’ perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. J. Consumer Res. 35(2):202–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • New York State Attorney General (2014) Airbnb in the city. https://es.ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/reports/AIRBNB_REPORT.pdf.Google Scholar
  • NFR (2017) Top 250 Global Powers of Retailing (National Retail Federation, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Park CW, Lessig VP (1981) Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. J. Consumer Res. 8(2):223–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park CW, Iyer ES, Smith DC (1989) The effects of situational factors on in-store grocery shopping behavior: The role of store environment and time available for shopping. J. Consumer Res. 15(4):422–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prelec D, Wernerfelt B, Zettelmeyer F (1997) The role of inference in context effects: Inferring what you want from what is available. J. Consumer Res. 24(1):118–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramdas K (2003) Managing product variety: An integrative review and research directions. Production Oper. Management 12(1):79–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rooderkerk RP, Lehmann DR (2021) Incorporating consumer product categorizations into shelf layout design. J. Marketing Res. 58(1):50–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scammon DL (1977) “Information load” and consumers. J. Consumer Res. 4(3):148–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scheibehenne B, Greifeneder R, Todd PM (2010) Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. J. Consumer Res. 37(3):409–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz B (2004) The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less (Ecco, New York).Google Scholar
  • SEC (2014) Filing Prospectus (JD.com, Inc.).Google Scholar
  • Shafir E, Simonson I, Tversky A (1993) Reason-based choice. Cognition 49(1):11–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan SM (1980) The cost of thinking. J. Consumer Res. 7(2):99–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sloot LM, Fok D, Verhoef PC (2006) The short-and long-term impact of an assortment reduction on category sales. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):536–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ursu R (2018) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effect of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ursu RM, Wang Q, Chintagunta PK (2020) Search duration. Marketing Sci. 39(5):849–871.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ursu RM, Zhang Q, Honka E (2023) Search gaps and consumer fatigue. Marketing Sci. 42(1):110–136.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Nierop E, Bronnenberg B, Paap R, Wedel M, Franses PH (2010) Retrieving unobserved consideration sets from household panel data. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):63–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang R, Sahin O (2018) The impact of consumer search cost on assortment planning and pricing. Management Sci. 64(8):3649–3666.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.