Interplay Between Servicizing and Remanufacturing: Economic and Environmental Implications

References

• Abbey JD, Geismar HN, Souza GC (2019) Improving remanufacturing core recovery and profitability through seeding. Production Oper. Management 28(3):610–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal VV, Bellos I (2017) The potential of servicizing as a green business model. Management Sci. 63(5):1545–1562.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal VV, Atasu A, Ülkü S (2021) Leasing, modularity, and the circular economy. Management Sci. 67(11):6782–6802.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal VV, Atasu A, Van Wassenhove LN (2019) OM Forum—New opportunities for operations management research in sustainability. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(1):1–12.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal VV, Toktay LB, Yücel Ş (2022) Non-ownership business models for solar energy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(4):2048–2063.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal VV, Ferguson M, Toktay LB, Thomas VM (2012) Is leasing greener than selling? Management Sci. 58(3):523–533.Link, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Souza GC (2013) How does product recovery affect quality choice? Production Oper. Management 22(4):991–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Sarvary M, Van Wassenhove LN (2008) Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Management Sci. 54(10):1731–1746.Link, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Van Wassenhove LN, Sarvary M (2009) Efficient take-back legislation. Production Oper. Management 18(3):243–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avci B, Girotra K, Netessine S (2015) Electric vehicles with a battery switching station: Adoption and environmental impact. Management Sci. 61(4):772–794.Link, Google Scholar
• Bellos I, Ferguson M, Toktay LB (2017) The car sharing economy: Interaction of business model choice and product line design. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(2):185–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Kong G, Li X, Courcoubetis C (2019) Peer-to-peer product sharing: Implications for ownership, usage, and social welfare in the sharing economy. Management Sci. 65(2):477–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Blaettchen P, Taneri N, Hasija S (2024) Business model choice for heavy equipment manufacturers. Oper. Res., ePub ahead of print July 11, https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.0656.Link, Google Scholar
• Caterpillar (2021) Pay for use. Accessed August 22, 2024, https://www.cat.com/en_US/articles/financing/what-is-caterpillar-pay-for-use-and-how-does-it-help-your-business.html.Google Scholar
• Debo LG, Toktay LB, Van Wassenhove LN (2005) Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Sci. 51(8):1193–1205.Link, Google Scholar
• European Union (2022) Circular economy. Accessed August 22, 2024, https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/circular-economy_en.Google Scholar
• Ferguson M, Guide VD Jr, Koca E, Souza GC (2009) The value of quality grading in remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management 18(3):300–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrer G, Swaminathan JM (2010) Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 203(2):370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbreth MR, Blackburn JD (2006) Optimal acquisition and sorting policies for remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management 15(3):384–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gebauer H, Haldimann M, Saul CJ (2017) Competing in business-to-business sectors through pay-per-use services. J. Service Management 28(5):914–935.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guide VDR Jr, Li J (2010) The potential for cannibalization of new products sales by remanufactured products. Decision Sci. 41(3):547–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guide VDR Jr, Van Wassenhove LN (2001) Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management 10(2):142–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guide VDR Jr, Teunter RH, Van Wassenhove LN (2003) Matching demand and supply to maximize profits from remanufacturing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(4):303–316.Link, Google Scholar
• Gutowski TG, Sahni S, Boustani A, Graves SC (2011) Remanufacturing and energy savings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45(10):4540–4547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs BW, Subramanian R (2012) Sharing responsibility for product recovery across the supply chain. Production Oper. Management 21(1):85–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanatlı MA, Karaer Ö (2022) Servitization as an alternative business model and its implications on product durability, profitability & environmental impact. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 301(2):546–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karatzas A, Papadopoulos G, Godsell J (2020) Servitization and the effect of training on service delivery system performance. Production Oper. Management 29(5):1101–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kowalkowski C, Gebauer H, Oliva R (2017) Service growth in product firms: Past, present, and future. Indust. Marketing Management 60:82–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ladas K, Kavadias S, Loch C (2022) Product selling vs. pay-per-use service: A strategic analysis of competing business models. Management Sci. 68(7):4964–4982.Link, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Seim K, Skiera B (2007) Does uncertainty matter? Consumer behavior under three-part tariffs. Marketing Sci. 26(5):698–710.Link, Google Scholar
• Matsumoto M (2019) Product service and remanufacturing. Nasr N, ed. Remanufacturing in the Circular Economy: Operations, Engineering and Logistics (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 111–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mutha A, Bansal S, Guide VDR Jr (2016) Managing demand uncertainty through core acquisition in remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management 25(8):1449–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mutha A, Bansal S, Guide VDR Jr (2022) What servicizing demands of a company: The need for inter-functional coordination. J. Oper. Management 68(4):408–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2019) Business models for the circular economy: Opportunities and challenges for policy. Technical report, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
• Oliva R, Kallenberg R (2003) Managing the transition from products to services. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 14(2):160–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliva R, Quinn J (2003) Interface’s Evergreen services agreement. Harvard Business School Case 603-112, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Örsdemir A, Deshpande V, Parlaktürk AK (2019) Is servicization a win-win strategy? Profitability and environmental implications of servicization. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):674–691.Link, Google Scholar
• Örsdemir A, Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya E, Parlaktürk AK (2014) Competitive quality choice and remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management. 23(1):48–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ovchinnikov A, Blass V, Raz G (2014) Economic and environmental assessment of remanufacturing strategies for product+ service firms. Production Oper. Management 23(5):744–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pandey V, Thurston D (2009) Effective age of remanufactured products: An entropy approach. J. Mechanical Design 131(3):0310081–0310089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quariguasi-Frota-Neto J, Bloemhof J (2012) An analysis of the eco-efficiency of remanufactured personal computers and mobile phones. Production Oper. Management 21(1):101–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raddats C, Kowalkowski C, Benedettini O, Burton J, Gebauer H (2019) Servitization: A contemporary thematic review of four major research streams. Indust. Marketing Management 83:207–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray S, Boyaci T, Aras N (2005) Optimal prices and trade-in rebates for durable, remanufacturable products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(3):208–228.Link, Google Scholar
• Reddy SK, Holak SL, Bhat S (1994) To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of line extensions. J. Marketing Res. 31(2):243–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robotis A, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove LN (2012) Lifecycle pricing for installed base management with constrained capacity and remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management 21(2):236–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• RollsRoyce (2017) Power by the hour. Accessed August 22, 2024, https://www.rolls-royce.com/media/our-stories/discover/2017/totalcare.aspx.Google Scholar
• Savaskan RC, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove LN (2004) Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Sci. 50(2):239–252.Link, Google Scholar
• Shi T, Gu W, Chhajed D, Petruzzi NC (2016) Effects of remanufacturable product design on market segmentation and the environment. Decision Sci. 47(2):298–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Souza GC (2013) Closed-loop supply chains: A critical review, and future research. Decision Sci. 44(1):7–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahel WR (1995) Caterpillar remanufactured products group. Technical report, Product-Life Institute, Geneva.Google Scholar
• Visnjic I, Jovanovic M, Raisch S (2022) Managing the transition to a dual business model: Tradeoff, paradox, and routinized practices. Organ. Sci. 33(5):1964–1989.Link, Google Scholar
• White AL, Stoughton M, Feng L (1999) Servicizing: The quiet transition to extended product responsibility. Technical report, Tellus Institute, Boston.Google Scholar
• Xerox (2021) Managed print services. Accessed August 22, 2024, https://www.xerox.com/en-eg/services/managed-print-solutions.Google Scholar
• Xiong Y, Zhou Y, Li G, Chan HK, Xiong Z (2013) Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 230(1):15–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Govindan K, Deng Q, Feng L (2019) Effects of design for the environment on firms’ production and remanufacturing strategies. Internat. J. Production Econom. 213:217–228.Crossref, Google Scholar