Demand Learning and Pricing for Varying Assortments

References

• Abadie A (2021) Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. J. Econom. Literature 59(2):391–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105(490):493–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ban G-Y, Keskin B (2022) Personalized dynamic pricing with machine learning: High dimensional features and heterogeneous elasticity. Management Sci. 67(9):5549–5568.Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Zeevi A (2012) Blind network revenue management. Oper. Res. 60(6):1537–1550.Link, Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Elmachtoub A, Sun Y (2020) Pricing analytics for rotable spare parts. INFORMS J. Appl. Analytics 50(5):313–324.Link, Google Scholar
• Caro F, Gallien J (2012) Clearance pricing optimization for a fast-fashion retailer. Oper. Res. 60(6):1404–1422.Link, Google Scholar
• Cavallo A (2018) More Amazon effects: Online competition and pricing behaviors. Jackson Hole Econom. Sympos. Conf. Proc. (Federal Reserve Bank, Kansas City, MO).Google Scholar
• Chen B, Chao X (2019) Parametric demand learning with limited price explorations in a backlog stochastic inventory system. IISE Trans. 51(6):605–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Wang Y, Zhou Y (2020) Dynamic assortment optimization with changing contextual information. J. Machine Learning Res. 21:1–44.Google Scholar
• Cheung WC, Simchi-Levi D, Wang H (2017) Dynamic pricing and demand learning with limited price experimentation. Oper. Res. 65(6):1722–1731.Link, Google Scholar
• Den Boer AV (2015) Dynamic pricing and learning: Historical origins, current research, and new directions. Surveys Oper. Res. Management Sci. 20(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dube A, Zipperer B (2015) Pooling multiple case studies using synthetic controls: An application to minimum wage case studies. Discussion Paper No. 8944, IZA, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Elshiewy O, Guhl D, Boztug Y (2017) Multinomial logit models in marketing—from fundamentals to state-of-the-art. Marketing ZFP 39(3):32–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferreira KJ, Bin HAL, Simchi-Levi D (2016) Analytics for an online retailer: Demand forecasting and price optimization. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(1):69–88.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferreira KJ, Simchi-Levi D, Wang H (2018) Online network revenue management using Thompson sampling. Oper. Res. 66(6):1586–1602.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher M, Gallino S, Li J (2018) Competition-based dynamic pricing in online retailing: A methodology validated with field experiments. Management Sci. 64(6):2496–2514.Link, Google Scholar
• Garbarino E, Lee OF (2003) Dynamic pricing in internet retail: Effects on consumer trust. Psych. Marketing 20(6):495–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haws KL, Bearden WO (2006) Dynamic pricing and consumer fairness perceptions. J. Consumer Res. 33(3):304–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hosanagar K, Chuang J, Krishnan R, Smith MD (2008) Service adoption and pricing of content delivery network (CDN) services. Management Sci. 54(9):1579–1593.Link, Google Scholar
• Huber J, Zwerina K (1996) The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. J. Marketing Res. 33(3):307–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Jedidi K, Essegaier S, Danaher PJ (2011) The impact of tariff structure on customer retention, usage, and profitability of access services. Marketing Sci. 30(5):820–836.Link, Google Scholar
• Javanmard A, Nazerzadeh H, Shao S (2019) Multi-product dynamic pricing in high-dimensions with heterogenous price sensitivity. 2020 IEEE Internat. Sympos. Inform. Theory (ISIT) (IEEE), 2652–2657.Google Scholar
• Kannan PK, Pope BK, Jain S (2009) Practice prize winner: Pricing digital content product lines: A model and application for the national academies press. Marketing Sci. 28(4):620–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Kanninen BJ (2002) Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments. J. Marketing Res. 39(2):214–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreif N, Grieve R, Hangartner D, Turner AJ, Nikolova S, Sutton M (2016) Examination of the synthetic control method for evaluating health policies with multiple treated units. Health Econom. 25:1514–1528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miao S, Chao X (2020) Dynamic joint assortment and pricing optimization with demand learning. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(2):525–545.Google Scholar
• Misra K, Schwartz EM, Abernethy J (2019) Dynamic online pricing with incomplete information using multiarmed bandit experiments. Marketing Sci. 38(2):226–252.Link, Google Scholar
• Newman JP, Ferguson ME, Garrow LA, Jacobs TL (2014) Estimation of choice-based models using sales data from a single firm. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(2):184–197.Link, Google Scholar
• Oh M, Iyengar G (2019) Thompson sampling for multinomial logit contextual bandits. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 32:3151–3161.Google Scholar
• Oh M, Iyengar G (2021) Multinomial logit contextual bandits: Provable optimality and practicality. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35(10), 9205–9213.Google Scholar
• Perakis G, Singhvi D (2020) Dynamic pricing with unknown non-parametric demand and limited price changes. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Petro G (2018) All fashion is fast fashion. Forbes (August 12), https://www.forbes.com/sites/gregpetro/2018/08/12/all-fashion-is-fast-fashion/?sh=55c12d1662f6.Google Scholar
• Raghavarao D, Wiley JB, Chitturi P (2010) Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis: Models and Designs (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robbins MW, Saunders J, Kilmer B (2017) A framework for synthetic control methods with high-dimensional, micro-level data: Evaluating a neighborhood-specific crime intervention. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 112(517):109–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandor Z, Wedel M (2001) Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers’ prior beliefs. J. Marketing Res. 38(4):430–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandor Z, Wedel M (2005) Heterogeneous conjoint choice designs. J. Marketing Res. 42(2):210–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauré D, Vielma JP (2018) Ellipsoidal methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. Oper. Res. 67(2):315–338.Google Scholar
• Sumida M, Gallego G, Rusmevichientong P, Topaloglu H, David J (2021) Revenue-utility tradeoff in assortment optimization under the multinomial logit model with totally unimodular constraints. Management Sci. 67(5):2845–2869.Link, Google Scholar
• Talluri KT, van Ryzin GJ (2005) Theory and Practice of Revenue Management (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar