Robust and Heterogenous Odds Ratio: Estimating Price Sensitivity for Unbought Items

References

• Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB (1996) Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91(434):444–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aouad A, Elmachtoub AN, Ferreira KJ, McNellis R (2019) Market segmentation trees. Preprint, submitted June 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01174.Google Scholar
• Athey S, Imbens G (2016) Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 113(27):7353–7360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Tibshirani J, Wager S (2019) Generalized random forests. Ann. Statist. 47(2):1148–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balke A, Pearl J (1997) Bounds on treatment effects from studies with imperfect compliance. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 92(439):1171–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargagli-Stoffi FJ, Gnecco G (2020) Causal tree with instrumental variable: An extension of the causal tree framework to irregular assignment mechanisms. Internat. J. Data Sci. Anal. 9(3):315–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargagli-Stoffi FJ, Gnecco G, De Witte K (2021) Heterogeneous causal effects with imperfect compliance: A Bayesian machine learning approach. Preprint, updated November 30, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.12707.Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Dunn J (2017) Optimal classification trees. Machine Learn. 106(7):1039–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper. Res. 52(1):35–53.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Dunn J, Mundru N (2019) Optimal prescriptive trees. INFORMS J. Optim. 1(2):164–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learn. 45(1):5–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA (1984) Classification and Regression Trees (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• Breslow N (1981) Odds ratio estimators when the data are sparse. Biometrika 68(1):73–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buuren Sv, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2010) mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in r. J. Statist. Software 45(3):1–68.Google Scholar
• Campi MC, Garatti S, Prandini M (2009) The scenario approach for systems and control design. Annu. Rev. Control 33(2):149–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10(1):101–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornfield J, Haenszel W, Hammond EC, Lilienfeld AM, Shimkin MB, Wynder EL (1959) Smoking and lung cancer: Recent evidence and a discussion of some questions. J. National Cancer Institute 22(1):173–203.Google Scholar
• Cover T, Hart P (1967) Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 13(1):21–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings P (2009) The relative merits of risk ratios and odds ratios. Arch. Pediatric Adolescent Medicine 163(5):438–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davies HTO, Crombie IK, Tavakoli M (1998) When can odds ratios mislead? BMJ 316(7136):989–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Efron B, Feldman D (1991) Compliance as an explanatory variable in clinical trials. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86(413):9–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engels EA, Schmid CH, Terrin N, Olkin I, Lau J (2000) Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: An empirical study of 125 meta-analyses. Statist. Medicine 19(13):1707–1728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gart JJ (1966) Alternative analyses of contingency tables. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 28(1):164–179.Google Scholar
• Gart JJ, Zweifel JR (1967) On the bias of various estimators of the logit and its variance with application to quantal bioassay. Biometrika 54(1/2):181–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW (2008) Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 102(1):33–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman B, Flaxman S (2017) European union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”. AI Magazine 38(3):50–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon L, Olshen RA (1978) Asymptotically efficient solutions to the classification problem. Ann. Statist. 6(3):515–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon L, Olshen RA (1980) Consistent nonparametric regression from recursive partitioning schemes. J. Multivariate Anal. 10(4):611–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenland S, Robins JM, Pearl J (1999) Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Statist. Sci. 14(1):29–46.Google Scholar
• Günlük O, Kalagnanam J, Li M, Menickelly M, Scheinberg K (2021) Optimal decision trees for categorical data via integer programming. J. Global Optim. 81(1):233–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haldane JB (1956) The estimation and significance of the logarithm of a ratio of frequencies. Ann. Hum. Genet. 20(4):309–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernán MA, Robins JM (2010) Causal Inference: What If (Chapman & Hill/CRC, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• Huedo-Medina TB, Sánchez-Meca J, Marín-Martínez F, Botella J (2006) Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psych. Methods 11(2):193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Rubin DB (2015) Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallus N (2017) Recursive partitioning for personalization using observational data. Doina P, Whye TY, eds. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Machine Learn. (JMLR, Cambridge, MA), 1789–1798.Google Scholar
• Kallus N, Zhou A (2018) Confounding-robust policy improvement. Bengio S, Wallach H, Larochelle H, Grauman K, Cesa-Bianchi N, Garnett R, eds. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 31 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 9269–9279.Google Scholar
• Kulinskaya E, Dollinger MB (2015) An accurate test for homogeneity of odds ratios based on Cochran’s Q-statistic. BMC Medical Res. Methodology 15(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laber EB, Zhao YQ (2015) Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes. Biometrika 102(3):501–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakkaraju H, Rudin C (2017) Learning cost-effective and interpretable treatment regimes. Aarti S, Jerry Z, eds. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, vol. 54 (JMLR, Cambridge, MA), 1789–1798.Google Scholar
• Landwehr N, Hall M, Frank E (2005) Logistic model trees. Machine Learn. 59(1–2):161–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawson R (2004) Small sample confidence intervals for the odds ratio. Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 33(4):1095–1113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee K, Bargagli-Stoffi FJ, Dominici F (2020) Causal rule ensemble: Interpretable inference of heterogeneous treatment effects. Preprint, submitted September 18, https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.09036.Google Scholar
• Lin J, Zhong C, Hu D, Rudin C, Seltzer M (2020) Generalized and scalable optimal sparse decision trees. Daumé H, Aarti S, eds. Proc. 37th Internat. Conf. on Machine Learn., vol. 119 (JMLR, Cambridge, MA), 6150–6160.Google Scholar
• Manski C (1997) Monotone treatment response. Econometrica 65(6):1311–1334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1990) Nonparametric bounds on treatment effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(2):319–323.Google Scholar
• Musalem A, Olivares M, Bradlow ET, Terwiesch C, Corsten D (2010) Structural estimation of the effect of out-of-stocks. Management Sci. 56(7):1180–1197.Link, Google Scholar
• Poole C, Shrier I, VanderWeele TJ (2015) Is the risk difference really a more heterogeneous measure? Epidemiology 26(5):714–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR (2014) Sensitivity analysis in observational studies. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, vol. 4 (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 1809–1814.Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin DB (1976) Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63(3):581–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen M, Tang CS, Wu D, Yuan R, Zhou W (2020) JD.com: Transaction-level data for the 2020 MSOM data driven research challenge. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(1):2–10.Google Scholar
• Smith RL (1984) Efficient Monte Carlo procedures for generating points uniformly distributed over bounded regions. Oper. Res. 32(6):1296–1308.Link, Google Scholar
• Su X, Tsai CL, Wang H, Nickerson DM, Li B (2009) Subgroup analysis via recursive partitioning. J. Machine Learn. Res. 10(2):141–158.Google Scholar
• Vapnik VN, Chervonenkis AY (1971) On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities. Measures of Complexity (Springer, Berlin), 11–30.Google Scholar
• Vulcano G, Van Ryzin G, Ratliff R (2012) Estimating primary demand for substitutable products from sales transaction data. Oper. Res. 60(2):313–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Wager S, Athey S (2018) Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 113(523):1228–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wager S, Walther G (2015) Adaptive concentration of regression trees, with application to random forests. Preprint, submitted March 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.06388.Google Scholar
• Woolf B (1955) On estimating the relation between blood group and disease. Ann. Human Genetics 19(4):251–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeileis A, Hothorn T, Hornik K (2008) Model-based recursive partitioning. J. Comput. Graphics Statist. 17(2):492–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Athey S, Wager S (2018) Offline multi-action policy learning: Generalization and optimization. Preprint, submitted October 10, https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04778.Google Scholar