The Impact of Ride-Hailing Services on Congestion: Evidence from Indian Cities

References

• Abhishek V, Guajardo JA, Zhang Z (2021) Business models in the sharing economy: Manufacturing durable goods in the presence of peer-to-peer rental markets. Inform. Systems Res. 32(4):1450–1469.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Sen A (2022) Antiracist curriculum and digital platforms: Evidence from Black Lives Matter. Management Sci. 68(4):2932–2948.Link, Google Scholar
• Agatz N, Erera A, Savelsbergh M, Wang X (2012) Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(2):295–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akbar PA, Duranton G (2018) Measuring congestion in a highly congested city: Bogotá. Unpublished working paper. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=O5_hc6EAAAAJ&citation_for_view=O5_hc6EAAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C.Google Scholar
• Akbar PA, Couture V, Duranton G, Storeygard A (2018) Mobility and congestion in urban India. NBER Working Paper No. 25218, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Akbarpour M, Li S, Gharan SO (2020) Thickness and information in dynamic matching markets. J. Political Econom. 128(3):783–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alonso-Mora J, Samaranayake S, Wallar A, Frazzoli E, Rus D (2017) On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 114(3):462–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson ML (2014) Subways, strikes, and slowdowns: The impacts of public transit on traffic congestion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(9):2763–2796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Castillo JC, Knoepfle D (2018) Service quality in the gig economy. Working paper, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Babar Y, Burtch G (2020) Examining the impact of ridehailing services on public transit use. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):820–834.Link, Google Scholar
• Bai J, So KC, Tang CS, Chen X, Wang H (2019) Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform with impatient customers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):556–570.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Hu M (2020) Operations management in the age of the sharing economy: What is old and what is new? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):93–101.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Hu M (2021) Introduction to the special issue on sharing economy and innovative marketplaces. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):549–552.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Kong G, Li X, Courcoubetis C (2019) Peer-to-peer product sharing: Implications for ownership, usage, and social welfare in the sharing economy. Management Sci. 65(2):477–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Bernhard H, Courcoubetis C, Kanakakis M, Papafragkos S (2022) Drivers, riders, and service providers: The impact of the sharing economy on mobility. Management Sci. 68(1):123–142.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, DeCroix GA, Keskin NB (2021) Competition between two-sided platforms under demand and supply congestion effects. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(5):1043–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Castro F, Lobel I (2021) Surge pricing and its spatial supply response. Management Sci. 67(3):1350–1367.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhatia G (2016) Can Uber win in India after China loss. Accessed June 29, 2019, https://cnb.cx/3gp4nji.Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya A (2018) As Uber sputters, Ola is really stepping on the gas in India. Accessed June 29, 2019, https://bit.ly/3ezZwLS.Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Candogan O, Saban D (2019) Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Oper. Res. 67(3):744–769.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Daniels KM, Lobel R (2017) The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2011) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen KM, Rossi PE, Chevalier JA, Oehlsen E (2019) The value of flexible work: Evidence from Uber drivers. J. Political Econom. 127(6):2735–2794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clewlow RR, Mishra GS (2017) Disruptive transportation: The adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States. Research report, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
• Cohen P, Hahn R, Hall J, Levitt S, Metcalfe R (2016) Using big data to estimate consumer surplus: The case of Uber. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cooper D, Castiglione J, Mislove A, Wilson C (2018) Profiling transport network company activity using big data. Transportation Res. Rec. 2672(42):192–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramer J, Krueger AB (2016) Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):177–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CSE (2017) Decoding Google map information on travel time to understand travel speed and congestion in Delhi. Accessed June 29, 2019, https://bit.ly/2BEAtsX.Google Scholar
• Davis N, Joseph HR, Raina G, Jagannathan K (2017) Congestion costs incurred on Indian Roads: A case study for New Delhi. Preprint, submitted August 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.08984.Google Scholar
• Diao M, Kong H, Zhao J (2021) Impacts of transportation network companies on urban mobility. Nature Sustainability 4(6):494–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erhardt GD, Roy S, Cooper D, Sana B, Chen M, Castiglione J (2019) Do transportation network companies decrease or increase congestion? Sci. Adv. 5(5):eaau2670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feigon S, Murphy C (2016) Shared mobility and the transformation of public transit number. Research report. https://trid.trb.org/view/1416012.Google Scholar
• Feng G, Kong G, Wang Z (2021) We are on the way: Analysis of on-demand ride-hailing systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(5):1237–1256.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher M, Olivares M, Staats BR (2020) Why empirical research is good for operations management, and what is good empirical operations management? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):170–178.Link, Google Scholar
• Fraiberger SP, Sundararajan A (2017) Peer-to-peer rental markets in the sharing economy. Research paper, NYU Stern School of Business, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Goel R, Tiwari G (2016) Access–egress and other travel characteristics of metro users in Delhi and its satellite cities. IATSS Res. 39(2):164–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong J, Greenwood BN, Song Y (2017) Uber might buy me a Mercedes Benz: An empirical investigation of the sharing economy and durable goods purchase. Preprint, submitted May 19, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2971072.Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Wattal S (2017) Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):163–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guda H, Subramanian U (2019) Your Uber is arriving: Managing on-demand workers through surge pricing, forecast communication, and worker incentives. Management Sci. 65(5):1995–2014.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Hall JD, Palsson C, Price J (2018) Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit? J. Urban Econom. 108:36–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall JV, Krueger AB (2018) An analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners in the United States. Industry Labor Related Rev. 71(3):705–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hampshire R, Simek C, Fabusuyi T, Di X, Chen X (2017) Measuring the impact of an unanticipated disruption of Uber/Lyft in Austin, TX. Preprint, submitted May 31, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2977969.Google Scholar
• Hanna R, Kreindler G, Olken BA (2017) Citywide effects of high-occupancy vehicle restrictions: Evidence from “three-in-one” in Jakarta. Science 357(6346):89–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henao A, Marshall WE (2019) The impact of ride-hailing on vehicle miles traveled. Transportation 46(6):2173–2194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karnik M (2017) Uber in India is fundamentally different from Uber in the West. Accessed June 29, 2019, https://bit.ly/3n8yAX6.Google Scholar
• Korde K (2018) Ola-Uber drivers may go on strike in Mumbai. Accessed June 29, 2019, https://bit.ly/2ZcukLD.Google Scholar
• Kreindler G (2016) Driving Delhi? Behavioural responses to driving restrictions. Unpublished working paper. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=jd3PTGAAAAAJ&citation_for_view=jd3PTGAAAAAJ:LkGwnXOMwfcC.Google Scholar
• Kreindler G (2018) Peak-hour road congestion pricing: Experimental evidence and equilibrium implications. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lavieri PS, Dias FF, Juri NR, Kuhr J, Bhat CR (2018) A model of ridesourcing demand generation and distribution. Transportation Res. Record 2672(46):31–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Hong Y, Zhang Z (2016) An empirical analysis of on-demand ride sharing and traffic congestion. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Inform. Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
• Liu M, Brynjolfsson E, Dowlatabadi J (2021) Do digital platforms reduce moral hazard? The case of Uber and taxis. Management Sci. 67(8):4665–4685.Google Scholar
• Mahamulkar S, Sen S (2018) Ola, Uber drivers’ strike called off in Mumbai. Accessed June 29, 2019, https://bit.ly/31KhVCv.Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Van Alstyne M (2014) The dark side of the sharing economy… and how to lighten it. Comm. ACM 57(11):24–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayle L, Dai D, Chan N, Cervero R, Shaheen S (2016) Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transportation Policy 45:168–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaller B (2017) Unsustainable? The Growth of App-Based Ride Services and Traffic, Travel and the Future of New York City (Schaller Consulting).Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2014) Trusting the ‘sharing economy’ to regulate itself. New York Times (March 2014), https://archive.nytimes.com/economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/03/trusting-the-sharing-economy-to-regulate-itself/?smid=tw-share.Google Scholar
• Tarduno M (2021) The congestion costs of Uber and Lyft. J. Urban Econom. 122:103318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Olivares M, Staats BR, Gaur V (2020) OM forum: A review of empirical operations management over the last two decades. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(4):656–668.Link, Google Scholar
• Tian L, Jiang B, Xu Y (2021) Manufacturer’s entry in the product-sharing market. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):553–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Tirachini A (2020) Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: An international review. Transportation 47(4):2011–2047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tirachini A, Gomez-Lobo A (2020) Does ride-hailing increase or decrease vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT)? A simulation approach for Santiago de Chile. Internat. J. Sustainable Transportation 14(3):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallsten S (2015) The competitive effects of the sharing economy: How is Uber changing taxis. Technology Policy Inst. 22:1–21.Google Scholar
• Wang H, Yang H (2019) Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 129:122–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu JJ, Tang CS, Shen ZJM, Chen XM (2020) A balancing act of regulating on-demand ride services. Management Sci. 66(7):2975–2992.Link, Google Scholar