Believing in Analytics: Managers’ Adherence to Price Recommendations from a DSS

References

• Achabal DD, McIntyre SH, Smith SA, Kalyanam K (2000) A decision support system for vendor managed inventory. J. Retailing 76(4):430–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aflaki A, Feldman P, Swinney R (2020) Becoming strategic: Endogenous consumer time preferences and multiperiod pricing. Oper. Res. 68(4):1116–1131.Google Scholar
• Akepanidtaworn K, Di Mascio R, Imas A, Schmidt L (2021) Selling fast and buying slow: Heuristics and trading performance of institutional investors. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Simester DI (2010) Price stickiness and customer antagonism. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):729–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arvan M, Fahimnia B, Reisi M, Siemsen E (2019) Integrating human judgement into quantitative forecasting methods: A review. Omega 86:237–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aviv Y, Pazgal A (2008) Optimal pricing of seasonal products in the presence of forward-looking consumers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):339–359.Link, Google Scholar
• Bai B, Dai H, Zhang D, Zhang F, Hu H (2022) The impacts of algorithmic work assignment on fairness perceptions and productivity: Evidence from field experiments. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(6):3060–3078.Google Scholar
• Ball RT, Ghysels E (2017) Automated earnings forecasts: Beat analysts or combine and conquer? Management Sci. 64(10):4936–4952.Link, Google Scholar
• Barrio PJ, Goldstein DG, Hofman JM (2016) Improving comprehension of numbers in the news. Proc. 2016 CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York).Google Scholar
• Bastani H, Kim C, Bastani O (2017) Interpreting blackbox models via model extraction. Preprint, submitted May 23, https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08504.Google Scholar
• Bean R (2022) Why becoming a data-driven organization is so hard. Harvard Bus. Rev. https://hbr.org/2022/02/why-becoming-a-data-driven-organization-is-so-hard.Google Scholar
• Bearden JN, Murphy RO, Rapoport A (2008) Decision biases in revenue management: Some behavioral evidence. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):625–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E (2011) Linking task conditions to physiology and judgment errors in RM systems. Production Oper. Management 20(6):860–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E (2013) Real-time feedback and booking behavior in the hospitality industry: Moderating the balance between imperfect judgment and imperfect prescription. J. Oper. Management 31(1):62–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E, Donohue K, Schultz KL (2006) Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J. Oper. Management 24(6):737–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1169–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blattberg RC, Hoch SJ (1990) Database models and managerial intuition: 50% model + 50% manager. Management Sci. 36(8):887–899.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E (2008) Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):519–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2013) Salience and consumer choice. J. Political Econom. 121(5):803–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (2004) Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. Camerer CF, Loewenstein G, Rabin M, eds. Advances in Behavioral Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 148–161.Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caplin A, Dean M (2015) Revealed preference, rational inattention, and costly information acquisition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(7):2183–2203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caro F, Gallien J (2012) Clearance pricing optimization for a fast-fashion retailer. Oper. Res. 60(6):1404–1422.Link, Google Scholar
• Castelo N, Bos MW, Lehmann DR (2019) Task-dependent algorithm aversion. J. Marketing Res. 56(5):809–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che H, Sudhir K, Seetharaman P (2007) Bounded rationality in pricing under state-dependent demand: Do firms look ahead, and if so, how far? J. Marketing Res. 44(3):434–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheremukhin A, Popova A, Tutino A (2015) A theory of discrete choice with information costs. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 113:34–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K (2009) Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1145–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui R, Allon G, Bassamboo A, van Mieghem JA (2015) Information sharing in supply chains: An empirical and theoretical valuation. Management Sci. 61(11):2803–2824.Link, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Gentzkow M (2019) Uniform pricing in U.S. retail chains. Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):2011–2084.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst B, Bharti S (2020) People reject algorithms in uncertain decision domains because they have diminishing sensitivity to forecasting error. Psych. Sci. 31(10):1302–1314.Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2016) Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Sci. 64(3):1155–1170.Link, Google Scholar
• Dijkstra JJ (1999) User agreement with incorrect expert system advice. Behav. Inf. Technol. 18(6):399–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dijkstra JJ, Liebrand WBG, Timminga E (1998) Persuasiveness of expert systems. Behav. Inform. Technol. 17(3):155–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donohue K, Schultz K (2018) The Future Is Bright. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 619–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donohue K, Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2019) Behavioral operations: past, present, and future. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):191–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisen MB (2011) Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 Book About Flies. Michael Eisen’s Blog. http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=358.Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W, Jank W, Karaesmen IZ, Zhang S (2012) An exploratory analysis of B2B price changes. J. Revenue Pricing Management 11(6):607–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W, Jank W, Zhang S, Karaesmen IZ (2015) Sales force behavior, pricing information, and pricing decisions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):495–510.Link, Google Scholar
• Fahimnia B, Pournader M, Siemsen E, Bendoly E, Wang C (2019) Behavioral operations and supply chain management—a review and literature mapping. Decision Sci. 50(6):1127–1183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng X, Gao J (2020) Is optimal recommendation the best? A laboratory investigation under the newsvendor problem. Decision Support Syst. 131:113251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fildes R, Goodwin P, Lawrence M, Nikolopoulos K (2009) Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: An empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply chain planning. Internat. J. Forecast. 25(1):3–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher M, Raman A (2010) The New Science of Retailing: How Analytics Are Transforming the Supply Chain and Improving Performance (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Flicker B (2018) Managerial insight and “optimal” algorithms. Working paper, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Simcoe TS (2011) CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Sci. 57(8):1469–1484.Link, Google Scholar
• Gallino S, Moreno A, Rooderkerk RP (2019) Omnichannel fulfillment dilemmas: Customer preferences and manager perceptions. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Gilbert B, Graff Zivin J (2014) Dynamic salience with intermittent billing: Evidence from smart electricity meters. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 107:176–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Pisano G (2008) Toward a theory of behavioral operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):676–691.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Ho TH, Amaldoss W, Brown AL, Chen Y, Cui TH, Galasso A, et al. (2012) Behavioral models of managerial decision-making. Marketing Lett. 23(2):405–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2012) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hammond JH, Raman A (1995) Sport Obermeyer, Ltd. TN. Technical report, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Hardcopf R, Gonçalves P, Linderman K, Bendoly E (2017) Short-term bias and strategic misalignment in operational solutions: Perceptions, tendencies, and traps. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 258(3):1004–1021.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Lim N, Cui TH (2010) Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Sci. 56(11):1891–1910.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoch SJ, Schkade DA (1996) A psychological approach to decision support systems. Management Sci. 42(1):51–64.Link, Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM (1981) Beyond discrete biases: functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. Psychol. Bull. 90(2):197–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibanez MR, Clark JR, Huckman RS, Staats BR (2017) Discretionary task ordering: Queue management in radiological services. Management Sci. 64(9):4389–4407.Link, Google Scholar
• Ibrahim R, Kim SH (2023) Is expert input valuable? The case of predicting surgery duration. Seoul J. Bus. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Ibrahim R, Kim SH, Tong J (2021) Eliciting human judgment for prediction algorithms. Management Sci. 67(4):2314–2325.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (1973) Attention and Effort (Prentice-Hall, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1991) Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(1):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Käki A, Kemppainen K, Liesiö J (2019) What to do when decision-makers deviate from model recommendations? Empirical evidence from hydropower industry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 278(3):869–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlinsky-Shichor Y, Netzer O (2019) Automating the B2B salesperson pricing decisions: Can machines replace humans and when? Columbia Business School working paper series, Northeastern University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Kayande U, De Bruyn A, Lilien GL, Rangaswamy A, van Bruggen GH (2008) How incorporating feedback mechanisms in a DSS affects DSS evaluations. Inform. Systems Res. 20(4):527–546.Link, Google Scholar
• Kazerouni A, van Roy B (2017) Learning to price with reference effects. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Kesavan S, Kushwaha T (2020) Field experiment on the profit implications of merchants’ discretionary power to override data-driven decision-making tools. Management Sci. 66(11):5182–5190.Google Scholar
• Kleinmuntz DN (1985) Cognitive heuristics and feedback in a dynamic decision environment. Management Sci. 31(6):680–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Kocabıyıkoğlu A, Göğüş CI, Gönül MS (2015) Revenue management vs. newsvendor decisions: Does behavioral response mirror normative equivalence? Production Oper. Management 24(5):750–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kocabıyıkoğlu A, Göğüş CI, Hekimoğlu MH (2018) The impact of decision types on revenue management decisions: An experimental study. Decision Sci. 49(2):225–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Mantin B, Ovchinnikov A (2017) Dynamic pricing in the presence of myopic and strategic consumers: Theory and experiment. Production Oper. Management 26(1):116–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (1986) Retail pricing and clearance sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(1):14–32.Google Scholar
• Leung E, Paolacci G, Puntoni S (2018) Man vs. machine: Resisting automation in identity-based consumer behavior. J. Marketing Res. 55(6):818–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li KJ, Jain S (2015) Behavior-based pricing: An analysis of the impact of peer-induced fairness. Management Sci. 62(9):2705–2721.Link, Google Scholar
• Li J, Moreno A, Zhang DJ (2019) Agent pricing in the sharing economy: Evidence from Airbnb. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy: Making Supply Meet Demand, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management (Springer International Publishing), 485–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin W, Kim SH, Tong J (2022) What drives algorithm use? An empirical analysis of algorithm use in type 1 diabetes self-management. Working paper, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA.Google Scholar
• Liu M, Bi W, Chen X, Li G (2014) Dynamic pricing of fashion-like multiproducts with customers’ reference effect and limited memory. Math. Problems Engrg. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/157865.Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (2006) New directions in goal-setting theory. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 15(5):265–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Cartledge N, Koeppel J (1968) Motivational effects of knowledge of results: A goal-setting phenomenon? Psychol. Bull. 70(6 pt.1):474–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Logg JM, Minson JA, Moore DA (2019) Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 151:90–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Longoni C, Bonezzi A, Morewedge CK (2019) Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. J. Consumer Res. 46(4):629–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Tong S, Fang Z, Qu Z (2019) Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Sci. 38(6):937–947.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Luong A, Kumar N, Lang KR (2020a) Algorithmic decision-making: examining the interplay of people, technology, and organizational practices through an economic experiment. Working paper, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.Google Scholar
• Luong A, Kumar N, Lang KR (2020b) Human–machine collaboration and algorithmic decision-making in organizations: Do humans still matter? Working paper, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.Google Scholar
• Mak V, Rapoport A, Gisches EJ (2018) Dynamic pricing decisions and seller-buyer interactions under capacity constraints. Games. 9(1):10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mak V, Rapoport A, Gisches EJ, Han J (2014) Purchasing scarce products under dynamic pricing: An experimental investigation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(3):425–438.Link, Google Scholar
• Mcintosh A, Reys BJ, Reys RE (1992) A proposed framework for examining basic number sense. For Learn. Math. 12(3):2–44.Google Scholar
• McLaughlin B, Spiess J (2022) Algorithmic assistance with recommendation-dependent preferences. Preprint, submitted August 16, https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.07626.Google Scholar
• Mišić VV, Perakis G (2019) Data analytics in operations management: A review. Manufacturing. Service Oper. Management 22(1):158–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Nasiry J, Popescu I (2011) Dynamic pricing with loss-averse consumers and peak-end anchoring. Oper. Res. 59(6):1361–1368.Link, Google Scholar
• Neate R (2014) Amazon sellers hit by nightmare before Christmas as glitch cuts prices to 1p. https://www.theguardian.com/money/2014/dec/14/amazon-glitch-prices-penny-repricerexpress.Google Scholar
• Oh HK, Oliva R (2020) Better Together? How managers can complement algorithms. Working paper, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Osadchiy N, Bendoly E (2015) Are consumers really strategic? Implications from an experimental study. Working paper, Emory University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2012) Behavioral Issues in Pricing Management. The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2015) Markdown or everyday low price? The role of behavioral motives. Management Sci. 62(2):326–346.Link, Google Scholar
• Peters E (2012) Beyond comprehension: The role of numeracy in judgments and decisions. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 21(1):31–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters E, Västfjäll D, Slovic P, Mertz C, Mazzocco K, Dickert S (2006) Numeracy and decision making. Psychol. Sci. 17(5):407–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips R, Şimşek AS, van Ryzin G (2015) The effectiveness of field price discretion: Empirical evidence from auto lending. Management Sci. 61(8):1741–1759.Link, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Whinston AB (2017) Pricing strategies under behavioral observational learning in social networks. Production Oper. Management 26(7):1249–1267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramachandran K, Tereyağoğlu N, Xia Y (2018) Multidimensional decision making in operations: An experimental investigation of joint pricing and quantity decisions. Management Sci. 64(12):5544–5558.Link, Google Scholar
• Rooderkerk RP, DeHoratius N, Musalem A (2022) The past, present, and future of retail analytics: Insights from a survey of academic research and interviews with practitioners. Production Oper. Management 31(10):3727–3748.Google Scholar
• Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1):7–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Cachon GP (2000) Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 46(3):404–420.Link, Google Scholar
• Sims CA (2003) Implications of rational inattention. J. Monet. Econom. 50(3):665–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder C, Keppler S, Leider S (2022) Algorithm reliance under pressure: The effect of customer load on service workers. Preprint, submitted March 29, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4066823.Google Scholar
• Staats BR, Dai H, Hofmann D, Milkman KL (2016) Motivating process compliance through individual electronic monitoring: An empirical examination of hand hygiene in healthcare. Management Sci. 63(5):1563–1585.Link, Google Scholar
• Sun J, Zhang D, Hu H, van Mieghem JA (2022) Predicting human discretion to adjust algorithmic prescription: A large-scale field experiment in warehouse operations. Management Sci. 68(2):846–865.Google Scholar
• Talluri KT, van Ryzin GJ (2005) The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management (Springer Science & Business Media).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan TF, Staats BR (2020) Behavioral drivers of routing decisions: evidence from restaurant table assignment. Production Oper. Management 29(4):1050–1070.Google Scholar
• Tiefenbeck V, Goette L, Degen K, Tasic V, Fleisch E, Lalive R, Staake T (2016) Overcoming salience bias: How real-time feedback fosters resource conservation. Management Sci. 64(3):1458–1476.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Beuningen B (2018) Automated store ordering vs. manual store ordering at Jumbo. Master’s thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• van den Boer A (2015) Dynamic pricing and learning: Historical origins, current research, and new directions. Surv. Oper. Res. Management Sci. 20(1):1–18.Google Scholar
• van der Staak BB, Basten RJ, van de Calseyde PP, Demerouti E, de Kok A (2020) Some-touch forecasting: A novel method to combine human judgment with statistical algorithms. Working paper, EyeOn, Aarle-Rixtel, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• van Donselaar KH, Gaur V, van Woensel T, Broekmeulen RACM, Fransoo JC (2010) Ordering behavior in retail stores and implications for automated replenishment. Management Sci. 56(5):766–784.Link, Google Scholar
• Weerasinghe K, Perera HN, Hurley J (2021) Behaviorally informed task sequencing for efficient warehouse operations. Working paper, University of Moratuwa, Katubedda, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zhang DJ, Dai H, Dong L, Qi F, Zhang N, Liu X, Liu Z, Yang J (2019) The long-term and spillover effects of price promotions on retailing platforms: Evidence from a large randomized experiment on Alibaba. Management Sci. 66(6):2589–2609.Link, Google Scholar