Information and Memory in Dynamic Resource Allocation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2019.1940

References

  • Ananthanarayanan G, Hung MC-C, Ren X, Stoica I, Wierman A, Yu M (2014) GRASS: Trimming stragglers in approximation analytics. Proc. 11th USENIX Sympos. Networked Systems Design Implementation (NSDI 14), 289–302Google Scholar
  • Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph A, Katz R, Konwinski A, Lee G, et al. (2010) Above the clouds: A view of cloud computing. Comm. ACM 53(4):50–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atar R, Lipschutz D (2019) Heavy-traffic limits for join-the-shortest-estimated-queue policy using delayed information. Technical report, Technion, Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
  • Badonnel R, Burgess M (2008). Dynamic pull-based load balancing for autonomic servers. Network Oper. Management Sympos. 2008 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 751–754.Google Scholar
  • Baharian G, Tezcan T (2011) Stability analysis of parallel server systems under longest queue first. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 74(2):257–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carter AJ, Davis KA, Evans LV, Cone DC (2009) Information loss in emergency medical services handover of trauma patients. Prehospital Emergency Care 13(3):280–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen H, Harrison JM, Mandelbaum A, van Ackere A, Wein L (1988) Empirical evaluation of a queueing network model for semiconductor wafer fabrication. Oper. Res. 36(2):202–215.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chowdhury M, Stoica I (2015) Efficient coflow scheduling without prior knowledge. Proc. ACM Conf. Special Interest Group Data Comm. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York).Google Scholar
  • Dai JG, Lin W (2005) Maximum pressure policies in stochastic processing networks. Oper. Res. 53(2):197–218.Google Scholar
  • Dai JG, Prabhakar B (2000) The throughput of data switches with and without speedup. Proc. IEEE Infocom (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 556–564.Google Scholar
  • Dimakis A, Walrand J (2006) Sufficient conditions for stability of longest-queue-first scheduling: Second-order properties using fluid limits. Adv. Appl. Probab. 38(2):505–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gamarnik D, Tsitsiklis JN, Zubeldia M (2018) Delay, memory, and messaging tradeoffs in distributed service systems. Stochastic Systems 8(1):45–74.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gans N, Koole G, Mandelbaum A (2003) Telephone call centers: Tutorial, review, and research prospects. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(2):79–177.Google Scholar
  • Hajek B (2015) Random Processes for Engineers (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison JM (2000) Brownian models of open processing networks: Canonical representation of workload. Ann. Appl. Probab. 10(1):75–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison JM (2002) Stochastic networks and activity analysis. Translations of the American Mathematical Society: Series 2, vol. 207 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI), 53–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison JM (2003) Correction: “Brownian models of open processing networks: Canonical representation of workload. Ann. Appl. Probab. 16(3):1703–1732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison JM, Zeevi A (2005) A method for staffing large call centers based on stochastic fluid models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(1):20–36.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnasamy S, Arapostathis A, Johari R, Shakkottai S (2018) On learning the cμ rule in single and parallel server networks. Proc. 56th Annual Allerton Conf. Commun. Control Comput. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 153–154.Google Scholar
  • Krishnasamy S, Sen R, Johari R, Shakkottai S (2016) Regret of queueing bandits. Lee DD, Sugiyama M, Luxburg UV, Guyon I, Garnett R, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 29 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 1669–1677.Google Scholar
  • Lu Y, Xie Q, Kliot G, Geller A, Larus JR, Greenberg A (2011) Join-idle-queue: A novel load balancing algorithm for dynamically scalable web services. Performance Evaluation 68(11):1056–1071.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mandelbaum A, Stolyar AL (2004) Scheduling flexible servers with convex delay costs: Heavy-traffic optimality of the generalized cμ-rule. Oper. Res. 52(6):836–855.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Manojlovich M, Adler-Milstein J, Harrod M, Sales A, Hofer TP, Saint S, Krein SL (2015) The effect of health information technology on health care provider communication: A mixed-method protocol. JMIR Res. Protocols 4(2):e72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKeown N, Anantharam V, Walrand J (1996) Achieving 100% throughput in an input-queued switch. Proc. IEEE Infocom (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 296–302.Google Scholar
  • Mitzenmacher M (2001) The power of two choices in randomized load balancing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Systems 12(10):1094–1104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pedarsani R, Walrand J, Zhong Y (2017) Robust scheduling for flexible processing networks. Adv. Appl. Probab. 49(2):603–628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pender J, Rand R, Wesson E (2020) A stochastic analysis of queues with customer choice and delayed information. Math. Oper. Res. 45(3):1104–1126.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pothier D, Monteiro P, Mooktiar M, Shaw A (2005) Pilot study to show the loss of important data in nursing handover. British J. Nursing 14(20):1090–1093.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts JW, Massoulié L (2000) Bandwidth sharing and admission control for elastic traffic. Telecomm. Systems 15(1–2):185–201.Google Scholar
  • Sahai A, Mitter S (2006) The necessity and sufficiency of anytime capacity for stabilization of a linear system over a noisy communication link—part I: Scalar systems. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 8(52):3369–3395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shah D, Wischik D (2012) Switched networks with maximum weight policies: Fluid approximation and multiplicative state space collapse. Ann. Appl. Probab. 22(1):70–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spencer J, Sudan M, Xu K (2014) Queuing with future information. Ann. Appl. Probab. 24(5):2091–2142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stolyar A, Yudovina E (2012) Tightness of invariant distributions of a large-scale flexible service system under a priority discipline. Stochastic Systems 2(2):381–408.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stolyar AL (2004) Maxweight scheduling in a generalized switch: State space collapse and workload minimization in heavy traffic. Ann. Appl. Probab. 14(1):1–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stolyar AL (2015) Pull-based load distribution in large-scale heterogeneous service systems. Queueing Systems 80(4):341–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stolyar AL (2017) Pull-based load distribution among heterogeneous parallel servers: The case of multiple routers. Queueing Systems 85(1–2):31–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tassiulas L, Ephremides A (1992) Stability properties of constrained queueing systems and scheduling policies for maximum throughput in multihop radio networks. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 37(12):1936–1948.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tatikonda S, Mitter S (2004) Control-under communication constraints. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 49(7):1056–1068.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsitsiklis JN, Xu K (2012) On the power of (even a little) resource pooling. Stochastic Systems 2(1):1–66.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vvedenskaya ND, Dobrushin RL, Karpelevich FI (1996) Queueing system with selection of the shortest of two queues: An asymptotic approach. Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 32(1):20–34.Google Scholar
  • Ward AR, Armony M (2013) Blind fair routing in large-scale service systems with heterogeneous customers and servers. Oper. Res. 61(1):228–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xu K (2015) Necessity of future information in admission control. Oper. Res. 63(5):1213–1226.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yüksel S, Başar T (2013) Stochastic Networked Control Systems: Stabilization and Optimization under Information Constraints (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zats D, Iyer AP, Ananthanarayanan G, Agarwal R, Katz R, Stoica I, Vahdat A (2015) Fastlane: Making short flows shorter with agile drop notification. Proc. 6th ACM Sympos. Cloud Comput. (ACM, New York), 84–96.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.