Identifying Merger Opportunities: The Case of Air Traffic Control

References

• Adler N, Hanany E, Proost S (2022) Competition in congested service networks with application to air traffic control provision in Europe. Management Sci. 68(4):2751–2784.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrell PJ, Bogetoft P, Grammeltvedt TE (2015) The efficiency of the regulation for horizontal mergers among electricity distribution operators in Norway. Proc. 12th Internat. Conf. on the Eur. Energy Market (EEM 2015) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), 1–5.Google Scholar
• Andersen JL, Bogetoft P (2007) Gains from quota trade: Theoretical models and an application to the Danish fishery. Eur. Rev. Agricultural Econom. 34(1):105–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner M, Finger M (2014) The single European sky gridlock: A difficult 10 year reform process. Utilities Policy. 31:289–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beesley M, Littlechild S (2013) Privatization: Principles, Problems and Priorities, Privatization, Regulation and Deregulation (Routledge, Oxfordshire, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blondiau T, Delhaye E, Proost S, Adler N (2016) ACCHANGE: Building economic models to analyse the performance of air navigation service providers. J. Air Transportation Management 56:19–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogetoft P (1997) DEA-based yardstick competition: The optimality of best practice regulation. Ann. Oper. Res. 73:277–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogetoft P, Katona K (2008) Efficiency gains from mergers in the healthcare sector. Technical report, Dutch Healthcare Authority, Utrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Bogetoft P, Otto L (2011) Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R, vol. 157 (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogetoft P, Wang D (2005) Estimating the potential gains from mergers. J. Production Anal. 23:145–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogetoft P, Thorsen BJ, Strange N (2003) Efficiency and merger gains in the Danish forestry extension service. Forest Sci. 49(4):585–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogetoft P, Boye K, Neergaard-Petersen H, Nielsen K (2007) Reallocating sugar beet contracts: Can sugar production survive in Denmark? Eur. Rev. Agricultural Econom. 34(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummins JD, Xie X (2008) Mergers and acquisitions in the US property-liability insurance industry: Productivity and efficiency effects. J. Banking Finance 32(1):30–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Färe R, Grosskopf S, Whittaker G (2013) Directional output distance functions: Endogeneous directions based on exogenous normalization constraits. J. Production Anal. 40:267–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Shapiro C (1990) Horizontal mergers: An equilibrium analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(1):107–126.Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Shapiro C (2001) Scale economies and synergies in horizontal merger analysis. Antitrust Law J. 68(3):685–710.Google Scholar
• Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Royal Statist. Soc. A 120:253–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher FM (1987) Horizontal mergers: Triage and treatment. J. Econom. Perspective 1(2):23–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Førsund FR, Hjalmarsson L (1979) Generalized Farrell measures of efficiency: An application to milk processing in Swedish dairy plants. Econom. J. (London) 89:294–315.Google Scholar
• Green RH, Cook WD (2004) A free coordination hull approach to efficiency measurement. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55(10):1059–1063.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grosskopf S (1986) The role of the reference technology in measuring productive efficiency. Econom. J. (London) 96:499–513.Google Scholar
• Gulding J, Knorr D, Rose M, Chen X, Enaud P, Hegendoerfer H (2010) US/Europe comparison of ATM-related operational performance. Air Traffic Control Quart. 18(1):5–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta D, Gerchak Y (2002) Quantifying operational synergies in a merger/acquisition. Management Sci. 48(4):517–533.Link, Google Scholar
• Kristensen T, Bogetoft P, Pedersen KM (2010) Potential gains from hospital mergers in Denmark. Healthcare Management Sci. 13:334–345.Google Scholar
• Lovell CAK, Pastor JT (1995) Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models. Oper. Res. Lett. 18:147–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lozano S (2013) Using DEA to find the best partner for a horizontal cooperation. Comput. Industry Engrg. 66(2):286–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell ML, Mulherin JH (1996) The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity. J. Financial Econom. 41(2):193–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller DC (1985) Mergers and market share. Rev. Econom. Stat. 67(2):259–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olesen OB, Petersen NC, Podinovski VV (2015) Efficiency analysis with ratio measures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 245:446–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peyrache A (2013) Industry structural inefficiency and potential gains from mergers and break-ups: A comprehensive approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 230:422–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1950) Monopoly and oligopoly by merger. Amer. Econom. Rev. 40(2):23–34.Google Scholar
• Treanor JL (1997) Privatization v. corporatization of the Federal Aviation Administration: Revamping air traffic control. J. Air Law Commerce 3:633–677.Google Scholar
• Verge T (2010) Horizontal mergers, structural remedies, and consumer welfare in a Cournot oligopoly with assets. J. Industrial Econom. 58(4):723–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogelsang I (2002) Incentive regulation and competition in public utility markets: A 20-year perspective. J. Regulatory Econom. 22(1):5–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams JC (2002) A zero-one programming model for contiguous land acquisition. Geographical Anal. 34:330–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1968) Economies as an antitrust defense: The welfare tradeoffs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 58(1):18–36.Google Scholar
• Wu DD, Zhou Z, Birge JR (2011) Estimation of potential gains from mergers in multiple periods: A comparison of stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 186(1):357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar