Two-Stage Stochastic Matching and Pricing with Applications to Ride Hailing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2398

References

  • Aggarwal G, Goel G, Karande C, Mehta A (2011) Online vertex-weighted bipartite matching and single-bid budgeted allocations. Proc. 22nd Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM, Philadelphia), 1253–1264.Google Scholar
  • Agrawal S, Ding Y, Saberi A, Ye Y (2010) Correlation robust stochastic optimization. Proc. 21st Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM, Philadelphia), 1087–1096.Google Scholar
  • Alaei S (2014) Bayesian combinatorial auctions: Expanding single buyer mechanisms to many buyers. SIAM J. Comput. 43(2):930–972.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alaei S, Hajiaghayi MT, Liaghat V (2012) Online prophet-inequality matching with applications to ad allocation. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 18–35.Google Scholar
  • Anari N, Niazadeh R, Saberi A, Shameli A (2019) Nearly optimal pricing algorithms for production constrained and laminar Bayesian selection. Proc. 2019 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 91–92.Google Scholar
  • Buchbinder N, Jain K, Naor JS (2007) Online primal-dual algorithms for maximizing ad-auctions revenue. Eur. Sympos. Algorithms (Springer, New York), 253–264.Google Scholar
  • Calinescu G, Chekuri C, Pál M, Vondrák J (2011) Maximizing a monotone submodular function subject to a matroid constraint. SIAM J. Comput. 40(6):1740–1766.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devanur NR, Jain K, Kleinberg RD (2013) Randomized primal-dual analysis of ranking for online bipartite matching. Proc. 24th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM, Philadelphia), 101–107.Google Scholar
  • DiDi Chuxing (2020) https://outreach.didichuxing.com/appEn-vue/KDD_CUP_2020, 2020.Google Scholar
  • Dütting P, Feldman M, Kesselheim T, Lucier B (2017) Prophet inequalities made easy: Stochastic optimization by pricing non-stochastic inputs. IEEE 58th Annual Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 540–551.Google Scholar
  • Edmonds J (1965) Paths, trees, and flowers. Canadian J. Math. 17:449–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ezra T, Feldman M, Gravin N, Tang ZG (2020) Online stochastic max-weight matching: Prophet inequality for vertex and edge arrival models. Proc. 21st ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 769–787.Google Scholar
  • Feige U (1998) A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. J. ACM 45(4):634–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M, Svensson O, Zenklusen R (2016) Online contention resolution schemes. Proc. 27th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM, Philadelphia), 1014–1033.Google Scholar
  • Feldman J, Mehta A, Mirrokni V, Muthukrishnan S (2009) Online stochastic matching: Beating 1-1/e. 50th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 117–126.Google Scholar
  • Feldman J, Henzinger M, Korula N, Mirrokni VS, Stein C (2010) Online stochastic packing applied to display ad allocation. Eur. Sympos. Algorithms (Springer, New York), 182–194.Google Scholar
  • Feng Y, Niazadeh R (2020) Batching and optimal multi-stage bipartite allocations. Chicago Booth Research Paper, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Feng Y, Niazadeh R (2021) Batching and optimal multi-stage bipartite allocations. 12th Innovations Theoretical Comput. Sci. Conf. (Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Wadern, Germany).Google Scholar
  • Feng Y, Niazadeh R, Saberi A (2019) Linear programming based online policies for real-time assortment of reusable resources. Preprint, submitted July 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3421227.Google Scholar
  • Feng Y, Niazadeh R, Saberi A (2020) Near-optimal Bayesian online assortment of reusable resources. Chicago Booth Research Paper (20-40), Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Feng Y, Niazadeh R, Saberi A (2021) Two-stage stochastic matching with application to ride hailing. Proc. 2021 ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM, Philadelphia), 2862–2877.Google Scholar
  • Gallai T (1964) Maximale systeme unabhangiger kanten. Magyar Tudományos Akadémia. Matematikai Kutató Intézetének Közleményei 9:401–413.Google Scholar
  • Gandhi R, Khuller S, Parthasarathy S, Srinivasan A (2006) Dependent rounding and its applications to approximation algorithms. J. ACM. 53(3):324–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goel A, Kapralov M, Khanna S (2012) On the communication and streaming complexity of maximum bipartite matching. Proc. 23rd Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM, Philadelphia), 468–485.Google Scholar
  • Golrezaei N, Nazerzadeh H, Rusmevichientong P (2014) Real-time optimization of personalized assortments. Management Sci. 60(6):1532–1551.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goyal V, Udwani R (2020) Online matching with stochastic rewards: Optimal competitive ratio via path based formulation. Proc. 21st ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 791–791.Google Scholar
  • Jaillet P, Lu X (2014) Online stochastic matching: New algorithms with better bounds. Math. Oper. Res. 39(3):624–646.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karp RM, Vazirani UV, Vazirani VV (1990) An optimal algorithm for on-line bipartite matching. Proc. 22nd Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (ACM, New York), 352–358.Google Scholar
  • Krengel U, Sucheston L (1977) Semiamarts and finite values. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83(4):745–747.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee E, Singla S (2017) Maximum matching in the online batch-arrival model. Internat. Conf. Integer Programming Combin. Optim. (Springer, New York), 355–367.Google Scholar
  • Lyft (2016) Matchmaking in Lyft line: Part 1. https://eng.lyft.com/matchmaking-in-lyft-line-9c2635fe62c4.Google Scholar
  • Ma W, Simchi-Levi D (2020) Algorithms for online matching, assortment, and pricing with tight weight-dependent competitive ratios. Oper. Res. 68(6).LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ma W, Simchi-Levi D, Zhao J (2021) Dynamic pricing (and assortment) under a static calendar. Management Sci. 67(4):2292–2313.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Manshadi V, Rodilitz S (2020) Online policies for efficient volunteer crowdsourcing. Proc. 21st ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 315–316.Google Scholar
  • Manshadi VH, Gharan SO, Saberi A (2012) Online stochastic matching: Online actions based on offline statistics. Math. Oper. Res. 37(4):559–573.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta A, Saberi A, Vazirani U, Vazirani V (2007) Adwords and generalized online matching. J. ACM, 54(5):22–es.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rawls J (1971) A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuel-Cahn E (1984) Comparison of threshold stop rules and maximum for independent nonnegative random variables. Ann. Probab. 12(4):1213–1216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schrijver A (2003) Combinatorial Optimization: Polyhedra and Efficiency, vol. 24 (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin).Google Scholar
  • Sviridenko M, Vondrák J, Ward J (2017) Optimal approximation for submodular and supermodular optimization with bounded curvature. Math. Oper. Res. 42(4):1197–1218.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Uber (2020) Uber marketplace and matching. https://marketplace.uber.com/matching.Google Scholar
  • Yan Q (2011) Mechanism design via correlation gap. Proc. 22nd Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM, Philadelphia), 710–719.Google Scholar
  • Zhang L, Hu T, Min Y, Wu G, Zhang J, Feng P, Gong P, Ye J (2017) A taxi order dispatch model based on combinatorial optimization. Proc. 23rd ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 2151–2159.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.