“Who Are You?…I Really Wanna Know”: Product Meaning and Competitive Positioning in the Nascent Synthesizer Industry

References

• Adner R, Csaszar FA, Zemsky PB (2014) Positioning on a multiattribute landscape. Management Sci. 60(11):2794–2815.Link, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Ruiz-Aliseda F, Zemsky P (2016) Specialist versus generalist positioning: Demand heterogeneity, technology scalability and endogenous market segmentation. Strategy Sci. 1(3):184–206.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1485–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1997) Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Becker HS (1995) The power of inertia. Qualitative Sociol. 18(3): 301–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch T, Douglas DG (2012) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bingham C, Kahl S (2013) The process of schema emergence: Assimilation, deconstruction, unitization and the plurality of analogies. Acad. Management J. 56(1):14–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bivona J, Milano D (1976) Edgar Winter: Expanding rock horizons. Keyboard (December) 20–22, 24.Google Scholar
• Clark KB (1985) The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Res. Policy 14(5):235–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clayton N (2002) SCOT: Does it answer? Tech. Culture 43(2):351–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colbeck J (1985) Keyfax: The Guide to Electronic Keyboards (Virgin Books, Ltd., London).Google Scholar
• Colbeck J (1996) Keyfax: Omnibus Edition (MixBooks, Emeryville, CA).Google Scholar
• Crombie D (1984) The Synthesizer and Electronic Keyboard Handbook (Alfred K. Knopf, New York).Google Scholar
• Darter T, Doerschuk B (1983) Chick Corea: A conversation with a chameleon. Keyboard (July), 54–63.Google Scholar
• Davis M (1980) Eduardo del Barrio: Caldera keyboardist launches solo career. Keyboard (May) 8–10, 66.Google Scholar
• Davis M (1981) Rockin’ on E Street with Bruce Springsteen: Roy Bittan and Danny Federici. Keyboard (July) 20–24.Google Scholar
• DeFillippi R, Grabher G, Jones C (2007) Introduction to paradoxes of creativity: Managerial and organizational challenges in the cultural economy. J. Organ. Behav. 28(5):511–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dilberto J (1983) Klaus Schulze. Keyboard (May) 44–46, 48, 51–52, 54–55.Google Scholar
• Doerschuk B (1977) Kerry Livgren and Steve Walsh of Kansas. Keyboard (August) 18, 34.Google Scholar
• Doerschuk B (1980a) Peter Nero. Keyboard (February) 42–62.Google Scholar
• Doerschuk B (1980b) Rabbit Bundrick: Keyboards with the Who. Keyboard (November) 64, 68, 70–74.Google Scholar
• Doerschuk B (1981) Steve Winwood: British rock’s retiring renaissance man returns. Keyboard (June) 48–50, 52, 55–60.Google Scholar
• Doerschuk B (1982) The new synthesizer rock. Keyboard (June) 11–18.Google Scholar
• Doerschuk B (1983a) Mark Stein: The rebirth of Vanilla Fudge. Keyboard (May) 11–12, 14, 16–19.Google Scholar
• Doerschuk B (1983b) Jim Gilmour: Around the world with Saga. Keyboard (July) 10, 12, 16, 17.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Kramer RM (2003) Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Acad. Management J. 46(3):283–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Rappa MA (1994) A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organ. Sci. 5(3): 344–362.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Rivkin JW (2007) On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organ. Sci. 18(3):420–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW (2005) Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwald T (1986a) Lyle Mays: At the horizons of jazz with and without Pat Methaney. Keyboard (July) 76–78, 81–82, 84, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98, 100, 102, 105–106, 108, 110, 113, 115.Google Scholar
• Greenwald T (1986b) Uses and abuses of synthesizers: Pulling sonic rabbits out of producers’ hats. Keyboard (September) 69, 148–149, 152–154.Google Scholar
• Grodal S, Gotsopoulos A, Suarez F (2015) The co-evolution of categories and designs during industry emergence. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):423–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt S, Carlos WC (2016) From farms to fuel tanks: Differential effects of collective action on firm entry in the emergent U.S. biodiesel sector. Working paper No. MOR, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Holmes TB (2002) Electronic and Experimental Music: Pioneers in Technology and Composition, 2nd ed. (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Evaluative schemas and the attention of critics in the US film industry. Indust. Corporate Change 15(3):467–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT (2005) Identities, genres, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 16(5):474–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Jones C, Livne-Tarandach R (2008) Designing a frame: Rhetorical strategies of architects. J. Organ. Behav. 29(8):1075–1099.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahl SJ, Grodal S (2016) Discursive strategies and radical technological change: Multilevel discourse analysis of the early computer (1947–1958). Strategic Management J. 37(1):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT (2008) Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73(2):270–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT, Fiss PC (2013) An ontological turn in categories research: From standards of legitimacy to evidence of actuality. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1138–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khaire M, Wadhwani RD (2010) Changing landscapes: The construction of meaning and value in a new market category—Modern Indian art. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1281–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J. Political Econom. 74(2):132–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois RN, Robertson PL (1989) Explaining vertical integration: Lessons from the American automobile industry. J. Econom. History 49(2):361–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law J, Callon M (1988) Engineering and sociology in a military aircraft project: A network analysis of technological change. Soc. Problems 35(3):284–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organ. Sci. 22(2):347–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2010) What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):1–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Rao H (2004) Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944–1985. Soc. Forces 82(3):969–999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyons L (1977) Josef Zawinul: Keyboard magician. Keyboard (September) 26–28, 38, 40.Google Scholar
• Manning P (2004) Electronic and Computer Music (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milano D (1975) Bob Moog: From Theremin to synthesizer. Contemporary Keyboard (September/October):14–15, 24–25, 37.Google Scholar
• Milano D (1977) Tom Oberheim: Designer of synthesizers. Keyboard (May) 20–21, 32, 34.Google Scholar
• Milano D (1978a) Robin Lumley: A CK poll winner discusses his multi-faceted keyboard career—From David Bowie to Brand X. Keyboard (March) 28, 40, 48–49, 53.Google Scholar
• Milano D (1978b) Jan Hammer. Keyboard (October) 20–22, 28, 30, 34, 36.Google Scholar
• Moog R (1975) What is a synthesizer? Keyboard (September/October) 45.Google Scholar
• National Association of Music Merchants (1974) Review of the music industry and amateur music participation. The American Music Conf., Music USA, Kalamazoo, MI.Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3): 439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson AJ (2015) The Sound of Innovation: Stanford and the Computer Music Revolution (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson AJ (2016) How to share “a really good secret”: Managing sharing/secrecy tensions around scientific knowledge disclosure. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson AJ, Irwin J (2014) “Defining what we do—all over again”: Occupational identity, technological change, and the librarian/internet-search relationship. Acad. Management J. 57(3): 892–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Gash DC (1994) Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (TOIS) 12(2):174–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 14(3):179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peteraf M, Shanley M (1997) Getting to know you: A theory of strategic group identity. Strategic Management J. 18(1):165–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinch TJ (2001) Why do you go to a music store to buy a synthesizer: Path dependence and the social construction of technology. Garud R, Karnøe P, eds. Path Dependence and Creation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London), 381–400.Google Scholar
• Pinch TJ, Bijker WE (1987) The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ, eds. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 17–50.Google Scholar
• Pinch TJ, Trocco F (2002) Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Pólos L, Hannan MT, Carroll GR (2002) Foundations of a theory of social forms. Indust. Corporate Change 11(1):85–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(6):61–78.Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R (2013) Mechanisms of technology re-emergence and identity change in a mature field: Swiss watchmaking, 1970–2008. Harvard Business School Working Paper 14-048, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Reger RK, Huff AS (1993) Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Management J. 14(2):103–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhea TL (1972) The Moog Sonic 6 Operation Manual (Moog Music, Inc., Williamsville, NY).Google Scholar
• Rosa JA, Porac JF, Runser-Spanjol J, Saxon MS (1999) Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Marketing 63:64–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. J. Political Econom. 82(1):34–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WR (1956) Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. J. Marketing 21(1):3–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snow N, Milano D (1977) David Sancious: Progresive multikeyboardist. Keyboard (January) 12, 34, 39.Google Scholar
• Star SL (2010) This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci., Tech., Human Values 35(5):601–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Procedures and Techniques for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Utterback JM (1995) Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management J. 16(6):415–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Grodal S, Gotsopoulos A (2015) Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry. Strategic Management J. 36(3):437–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company.” Organ. Sci. 20(2): 441–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11): 1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vail M (1993) Vintage Synthesizers (Miller Freeman Books, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Vergne JP, Wry T (2014) Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. J. Management Stud. 51(1):56–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watkiss L (2016) Apple’s iPad: The co-emergence of a novel product and product category. Unpublished dissertation, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(2):449–463.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoshino M (1977) Isao Tomita: Electronic synthesist. Keyboard (August) 24–26, 28.Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2016) Optimal distinctiveness revisited: An integrative framework for understanding the balance between differentiation and conformity in individual and organizational identities. Pratt M, Schultz M, Ashforth B, Ravasi D, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar