Organizing Knowledge Production Teams Within Firms for Innovation

References

• Aggarwal VA, Hsu DH (2014) Entrepreneurial exits and innovation. Management Sci. 60(4):867–887.Link, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal VA, Wu B (2015) Organizational constraints to adaptation: Intrafirm asymmetry in the locus of coordination. Organ. Sci. 26(1):218–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 3(3):321–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bantel KA, Jackson SE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. 10(S1):107–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Operti E (2013) Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1591–1613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixon NM (1994) The Organizational Learning Cycle: How We Can Learn Collectively (McGraw-Hill, London).Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2012) Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy (John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA).Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fortunato S, Bergstrom CT, Börner K, Evans JA, Helbing D, Milojević S, Petersen AM, et al.. (2018) Science of Science. Science 359(6379):eaao0185.Google Scholar
• Funk RJ (2013) Making the most of where you are: Geography, networks, and innovation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 57(1):193–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerwin D, Moffat L (1997) Withdrawal of team autonomy during concurrent engineering. Management Sci. 43(9):1275–1287.Link, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grigoriou K, Rothaermel FT (2013) Structural microfoundations of innovation: The role of relational stars. J. Management 40(2):586–615.Google Scholar
• Gruber M, Harhoff D, Hoisl K (2013) Knowledge recombination across technological boundaries: Scientists vs. engineers. Management Sci. 59(4):837–851.Link, Google Scholar
• Haas MR, Hansen MT (2007) Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management J. 28(11):1133–1153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Ziedonis RH (2001) The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. 32(1):101–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Weinkauf K, Gemuenden HG (2004) Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organ. Sci. 15(1):38–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoisl K, Gruber M, Conti A (2016) R&D team diversity and performance in hypercompetitive environments. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1455–1477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2002) Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Ocasio W (2012) Architecture, attention, and adaptation in the multibusiness firm: General Electric from 1951 to 2001. Strategic Management J. 33(6):633–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kotha R, George G, Srikanth K (2012) Bridging the mutual knowledge gap: Coordination and the commercialization of university science. Acad. Management J. 56(2):498–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahiri N (2010) Geographic distribution of R&D activity: How does it affect innovation quality? Acad. Management J. 53(5):1194–1209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2011) Location, decentralization, and knowledge sources for innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(3):641–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG, Gilbert R, Griliches Z (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 1987(3):783–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li GC, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, Amy ZY, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010). Res. Policy 43(6):941–955.Google Scholar
• Mortensen M, Haas M (2018) Rethinking teams: from bounded membership to dynamic participation. Organ. Sci. 29(2):341–355.Google Scholar
• Nerkar A, Paruchuri S (2005) Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Sci. 51(5):771–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Barnett WP (2017) The coevolution of organizational knowledge and market technology. Strategy Sci. 2(1):64–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabbagh K (1996) Twenty-First Century Jet: The Making and Marketing of the Boeing 777 (Scribner, New York).Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1934) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):125–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Stuart TE (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):81–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P (2011) Integrating distributed work: Comparing task design, communication, and tacit coordination mechanisms. Strategic Management J. 32(8):849–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):172–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W (2002) Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organ. Sci. 13(2):179–190.Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(4):587–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valentine MA, Edmondson AC (2014) Team scaffolds: How mesolevel structures enable role-based coordination in temporary groups. Organ. Sci. 26(2):405–422.Link, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2013) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5th ed. (South-Western, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science. 316(5827):1036–1039.Google Scholar