Going the Distance: The Foreign Investment Strategies of Sovereign Wealth Funds

References

• Aguilera RV, Capapé J, Santiso J (2016) Sovereign wealth funds: A strategic governance view. Acad. Management Perspect. 30(1):5–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson JE (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 69(1):106–116.Google Scholar
• Anderson JE, van Wincoop E (2004) Trade costs. J. Econom. Literature 42(3):691–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belenzon S, Hashai N, Patacconi A (2019) The architecture of attention: Group structure and subsidiary autonomy. Strategic Management J. 40(10):1610–1643.Google Scholar
• Benito GRG, Gripsrud G (1992) The expansion of foreign direct investments: Discrete rational location choices or a cultural learning process? J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 23(3):461–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett VM, Feldman ER (2017) Make room! Make room! A note on sequential spinoffs and acquisitions. Strategy Sci. 2(2):100–110.Link, Google Scholar
• Bergstrand JH (1985) The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 67(3):474–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Lerner J, Schoar A (2013) The investment strategies of sovereign wealth funds. J. Econom. Perspect. 27(2):219–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry H, Guillén MF, Zhou N (2010) An institutional approach to cross-national distance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(9):1460–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk S, Jindra B (2018) Product innovation and decision-making autonomy in subsidiaries of multinational companies. J. World Bus. 53(4):529–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk S, Kostova T, Kunst VE, Spadafora E, van Essen M (2018) Cultural distance and firm internationalization: A meta-analytical review and theoretical implications. J. Management 44(1):89–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bremmer I (2010) Article commentary: The end of the free market: Who wins the war between states and corporations? Eur. View 9(2):249–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calluzzo P, Dong NG, Godsell D (2017) Sovereign wealth fund investments and the US political process. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 48(2):222–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carney RW (2018) Authoritarian Capitalism: Sovereign Wealth Funds and State-Owned Enterprises in East Asia and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chhaochharia V, Laeven L (2008) Sovereign Wealth Funds: Their Investment Strategies and Performance. (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
• Clogg CC, Petkova E, Haritou A (1995) Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(5):1261–1293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuervo-Cazurra A, Inkpen A, Musacchio A, Ramaswamy K (2014) Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(8):919–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis PS, Desai AB, Francis JD (2000) Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 31(2):239–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunning JH (1998) Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 29(1):45–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eden L, Miller SR (2004) Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. Hitt M, Cheng J, eds. Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: Diversity, Complexity and Relevance, Advances in International Management, vol. 16 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 187–221.Google Scholar
• El Said H, McDonald F (2002) Institutional reform and entry mode by foreign firms: The case of Jordan Summary. J. Institutional Innovation Developement Transition 6:76–88.Google Scholar
• Faccio M, Lang LHP (2002) The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. J. Financial Econom. 65(3):365–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan JPH, Wong TJ, Zhang T (2013) Institutions and organizational structure: The case of state-owned corporate pyramids. J. Law Econom. Organ. 29(6):1217–1252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flores RG, Aguilera RV (2007) Globalization and location choice: An analysis of US multinational firms in 1980 and 2000. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 38(7):1187–1210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (2001) Distance still matters. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(8):1–11.Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2001) How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. J. Finance 56(3):1053–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guedhami O (2012) Characteristics of government acquisitions over time: International evidence and crisis effect. Privatization Barometer Rep., 30–43.Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1(1):51–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernández V, Nieto MJ (2015) The effect of the magnitude and direction of institutional distance on the choice of international entry modes. J. World Bus. 50(1):122–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilary G, Hui KW (2009) Does religion matter in corporate decision making in America? J. Financial Econom. 93(3):455–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G (1980) Culture and organizations. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 10(4):15–41.Google Scholar
• Hutzschenreuter T, Voll JC, Verbeke A (2011) The impact of added cultural distance and cultural diversity on international expansion patterns: A Penrosean perspective. J. Management Stud. 48(2):305–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds (2008) Sovereign Wealth Funds Generally Accepted Principles and Practices: “Santiago Principles” (IFSWF, London).Google Scholar
• Johan SA, Knill A, Mauck N (2013) Determinants of sovereign wealth fund investment in private equity vs public equity. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 44(2):155–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang Y, Jiang F (2012) FDI location choice of Chinese multinationals in East and Southeast Asia: Traditional economic factors and institutional perspective. J. World Bus. 47(1):45–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2010) The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues (World Bank, Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
• Knill A, Lee BS, Mauck N (2012) Bilateral political relations and sovereign wealth fund investment. J. Corporate Finance 18(1):108–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 19(3):411–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T (1996) Success of the transnational transfer of organizational practices within multinational companies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Kostova T (1999) Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):308–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Zaheer S (1999) Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):64–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavelle KC (2017) Sovereign Wealth Funds and Foreign Policy. Oxford Handbook of Sovereign Wealth Funds (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Lyngsie J, Foss NJ (2017) The more, the merrier? Women in top-management teams and entrepreneurship in established firms. Strategic Management J. 38(3):487–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marano V, Tashman P, Kostova T (2017) Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 48(3):386–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Megginson WL, Fotak V (2015) Rise of the fiduciary state: A survey of sovereign wealth fund research. J. Econom. Surveys 29(4):733–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melitz J, Toubal F (2014) Native language, spoken language, translation and trade. J. Internat. Econom. 93(2):351–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murtinu S, Scalera VG (2016) Sovereign wealth funds’ internationalization strategies: The use of investment vehicles. J. Internat. Management 22(3):249–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Portes R, Rey H (2005) The determinants of cross-border equity flows. J. Internat. Econom. 65(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rose P (2017) Sovereign Wealth Funds and Domestic Political Risk. Oxford Handbook of Sovereign Wealth Funds (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Salomon R, Wu Z (2012) Institutional distance and local isomorphism strategy. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(4):343–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stulz RM, Williamson R (2003) Culture, openness, and finance. J. Financial Econom. 70(3):313–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang RD, Shaver JM (2016) The multifaceted nature of competitive response: Repositioning and new product launch as joint response to competition. Strategy Sci. 1(3):148–162.Link, Google Scholar
• Williams RA (2012) Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 12(2):308–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolfenzon D (1998) A Theory of Pyramidal Ownership. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Xu D, Shenkar O (2002) Note: Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 27(4):608–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer S (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Acad. Management J. 38(2):341–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou N, Guillén MF (2015) From home country to home base: A dynamic approach to the liability of foreignness. Strategic Management J. 36(6):907–917.Crossref, Google Scholar