Forced Ecosystems and Digital Stepchildren: Reconfiguring Advertising Suppliers to Realize Disruptive Social Media Technology

References

• AdAge (2014) Mobile, content new focus for B-to-B in 2014. Accessed March 9, 2020, https://adage.com/article/btob/mobile-content-focus-b-b-2014/290904.Google Scholar
• Adegbesan A, Higgins M (2010) The intra-alliance division of value created through collaboration. Strategic Management J. 32(2):187–211.Google Scholar
• Adner R (2017) Ecosystem as structure? An actionable construct for strategy. J. Management 43(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R (2002) When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management J. 23(8):667–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R (2012) The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management J. 30(3):306–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2016) Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Reexamining technology S-curves. Strategic Management J. 37(4):625–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Afuah A (2000) How much do your co‐opetitors’ capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Management J. 21(3):397–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Afuah A (2001) Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change? Acad. Management J. 44(6):1211–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert C, Tandon V (2008) Chapter 1: Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):1–98.Google Scholar
• Anand J, Oriani R, Vassolo RS (2010) Alliance activity as a dynamic capability in the face of a discontinuous technological change. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1213–1232.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari S, Garud R (2009) Inter-generational transitions in socio-technical systems: The case of mobile communications. Res. Policy 38(2):382–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari S, Krop P (2012) Incumbent performance in the face of a radical innovation: Toward a framework for incumbent challenger dynamics. Res. Policy 41(8):1357–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari S, Garud R, Kumaraswamy A (2016) The disruptor’s dilemma: TiVo and the US television ecosystem. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1829–1853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anthony C, Nelson AJ, Tripsas M (2016) “Who are you? I really wanna know”: Product meaning and competitive positioning in the nascent synthesizer industry. Strategy Sci. 1(3):163–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Liebeskind JP (1999) Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):49–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bart Y, Stephen A, Sarvary M (2014) Which products are best suited to mobile advertising? A field study of mobile display advertising effects on consumer attitudes and intentions. J. Marketing Res. 51(3):270–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Calabrese T, Silverman BS (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 21(3):267–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ (2010) Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and Internet telephony. Organ. Sci. 21(1):42–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman M (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):676–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berthon PR, Pitt LF, Plangger K, Shapiro D (2012) Marketing meets Web 2.0, social media, and creative consumers: Implications for international marketing strategy. Bus. Horizons 55(3):261–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (1991) Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. 2(3):239–262.Link, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Yoffie DB (2007) Wintel: Cooperation and conflict. Management Sci. 53(4):584–598.Link, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Santaló J (2019) Generativity tension and value creation in platform-based technology ecosystems. Organ. Sci. 30(3):617–641.Link, Google Scholar
• Chandy RK, Tellis GJ (2000) The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. J. Marketing 64(3):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Rosenbloom RS (1995) Explaining the attacker’s advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics and the value network. Res. Policy 24(2):233–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, McDonald R, Altman EJ, Palmer JE (2018) Disruptive innovation: An intellectual history and directions for future research. J. Management Stud. 55(7):1043–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica (N.S.) 4(16):386–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daneels E (2004) Disruptive technology reconsidered: A critique and research agenda. J. Product Innovation Management 21(4):246–258.Google Scholar
• Daneels E, Verona G, Provera B (2017) Overcoming the inertia of organizational competence: Olivetti’s transition from mechanical to electronic technology. Indust. Corporate Change 27(3):595–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dattée B, Alexy O, Autio E (2018) Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Acad. Management J. 61(2):466–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doz YL, Olk PM, Ring PS (2000) Formation processes of R&D consortia: Which path to take? Where does it lead? Strategic Management J. 21(3):239–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan TR, Everett SE (1993) Client perceptions of integrated communications. J. Advertising Res. 32(3):30–39.Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (1996) Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management J. 17(4):271–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (1997) Effective interfim collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value. Strategic Management J. 18(7):535–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. 21(3):345–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles RG (1981) The quasifirm in the construction industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):335–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2006) Strategies for two sided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(10):92–101.Google Scholar
• Evans D, McKee J (2010) Social Media Marketing: The Next Generation of Business Engagement (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Ferraro F, Gurses K (2009) Building architectural advantage in the US motion picture industry: Lew Wasserman and the Music Corporation of America. Eur. Management Rev. 6(4):233–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fixson SK, Park JK (2008) The power of integrality: Linkages between product architecture, innovation, and industry structure. Res. Policy 37(8):1296–1316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garrahan M, Daneshkhu S, Nicolaou A (2017) Advertising companies struggle to adapt to a new world. Financial Times (November 17), https://www.ft.com/content/3081a2ee-c955-11e7-ab18-7a9fb7d6163e.Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Pierce L (2017) Subprime governance: Agency costs in vertically integrated banks and the 2008 mortgage crisis. Strategic Management J. 38(2):300–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Munir K (2008) From transaction to transformation costs: The case of Polaroid’s SX-70 camera. Res. Policy 37(4):690–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2008) How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 49(2):28–35.Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Henderson R (2007) Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R (1999) Taking Coase seriously. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):145–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glasmeier A (1991) Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry. Res. Policy 20(5):469–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomes-Casseres B (2001) The logic of alliance fads: Why collective competition spreads. Koza MP, Lewin AY, eds. Strategic Alliances and Firm Adaptation: A Coevolution Perspective (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY).Google Scholar
• Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2008) Look before you leap: Market opportunity identification in emerging technology firms. Management Sci. 54(9):1652–1665.Link, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (2007) Managing Network Resources: Alliances, Affiliations, and Other Relational Assets Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Sytch M (2007) Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer’s performance in procurement relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):32–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha HY (2004) Factors influencing consumer perceptions of brand trust online. J. Product Brand Management 13(5):329–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackley CE (2003) Doing Research Projects in Marketing, Management and Consumer Research (Routledge, London)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannah DP, Eisenhardt KM (2018) How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3163–3192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannah DP, Bremner RP, Eisenhardt KM (2016) Resource redeployment in business ecosystems. Folta TB, Helfat CE, Karim S, eds. Resource Redeployment and Corporate Strategy. Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 35 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, United Kingdom), 19–48.Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Lieberman MB (2002) The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre‐history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30Google Scholar
• Hess AM, Rothaermel FT (2011) When are assets complementary? Star scientists, strategic alliances, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 32(8):895–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CW, Rothaermel FT (2003) The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad. Management Rev. 28(2):257–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschman EC (1989) Role-based models of advertising creation and production. J. Advertising 18(4):42–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoehn-Weiss MN, Karim S, Lee CH (2017) Examining alliance portfolios beyond the dyads: The relevance of redundancy and nonuniformity across and between partners. Organ. Sci. 28(1):56–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoffmann WH (2007) Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances. Strategic Management J. 28(8):827–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber GP (1985) Temporal stability and response-order biases in participant descriptions of organizational decisions. Acad. Management J. 28(4):943–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber GP, Power DJ (1985) Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management J. 6(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes TP (1983) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880–1930 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG (2005) Industry change through vertical disintegration: How and why markets emerged in mortgage banking. Acad. Management J. 48(3):465–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Toward a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2255–2276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Knudsen T, Augier M (2006) Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Res. Policy 35(8):1200–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, MacDuffie JP, Tae CJ (2015) Agency, structure, and the dominance of OEMs: Change and stability in the automotive sector. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1942–1967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalaignanam K, Shankar V, Varadarajan R (2007) Asymmetric new product development alliances: Win-win or win-lose partnerships? Management Sci. 53(3):357–374.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R (2013) Persistence of integration in the face of specialization: How firms navigated the winds of disintegration and shaped the architecture of the semiconductor industry. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1195–1213.Link, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Klueter T (2015) Decoding the adaptability–rigidity puzzle: Evidence from pharmaceutical incumbents’ pursuit of gene therapy and monoclonal antibodies. Acad. Management J. 58(4):1180–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Lee JM (2013) Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic Management J. 34(3):274–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, McGrath P (2014) Unmasking the interplay between technology evolution and R&D collaboration: Evidence from the global semiconductor manufacturing industry, 1990-2010. Res. Policy 43(3):555–569.Google Scholar
• Kitchen PJ, Brignell J, Li T, Spickett Jones G (2004) The emergence of IMC: A theoretical perspective. J. Advertising Res. 44(1):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S, Simons KL (2000) Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the US television receiver industry. Strategic Management J. 21(10‐11):997–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• KPMG (2019) Future-ready index: Global construction survey. Accesses April 1, 2020, https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2019/04/global-construction-survey-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
• Lahiri N, Narayanan S (2013) Vertical integration, innovation, and alliance portfolio size: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management J. 34(9):1042–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D (2007) Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the US software industry. Strategic Management J. 28(12):1187–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Miller SR (2008) Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 19(4):623–646.Link, Google Scholar
• Leney, J (2019) How automotive companies are turning disruption into opportunity in product development. Digitalist Magazine (May 9), https://www.digitalistmag.com/future-of-work/2019/05/09/how-automotive-companies-are-turning-disruption-into-opportunity-in-product-development-06198329/.Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1990) A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organ. Sci. 1(3):248–266.Link, Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Richman BD (2004) Organisational responses to discontinuous innovation: A case study approach. Internat. J. Innovation Management 8(1):87–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madhavan R, Koka BR, Prescott JE (1998) Networks in transition: How industry events (re) shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management J. 19(5):439–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2004) The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(4):44–81.Google Scholar
• Ozcan P (2018) Growing with the market: How changing conditions during market growth affect formation and evolution of interfirm ties. Strategic Management J. 39(2):295–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2):246–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Santos FM (2015) The market that never was: Turf wars and failed alliances in mobile payments. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1486–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L (2009) Big losses in ecosystem niches: How core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts. Strategic Management J. 30(3):323–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R (2019) Technology reemergence: Creating new value for old technologies in Swiss mechanical watchmaking, 1970–2008. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(3):576–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R, Glynn MA, Tushman M (2019) Frame flexibility: The role of cognitive and emotional framing in innovation adoption by incumbent firms. Strategic Management J. 40(7):1013–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reitzig M, Wagner S (2010) The hidden costs of outsourcing: Evidence from patent data. Strategic Management J. 31(11):1183–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Schilling MA, Bellavitis C (2019) Platform strategy: Managing ecosystem value through selective promotion of complements. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1232–1251.Link, Google Scholar
• Rindova V, Kotha S (2001) Continuous morphing: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1263–1280.Google Scholar
• Rindova V, Martins L, Yeow A (2016) The hare and the fast tortoise: Dynamic resource reconfiguration and the pursuit of new growth opportunities by Yahoo and Google (1995–2007). Folta TB, Helfat CE, Karim S, eds. Resource Redeployment and Corporate Strategy. Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 35 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, United Kingdom), 253–284.Google Scholar
• Rindova V, Yeow A, Martins L, Faraj S (2012) Partnering portfolios, value creation logics and growth trajectories: A comparison of Yahoo and Google (1995–2007). Strategic Entreprise J. 6(2):133–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Boeker W (2008) Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 29(1):47–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandström C, Magnusson M, Jörnmark J (2009) Exploring factors influencing incumbents’ response to disruptive innovation. Creativity Innovation Management 18(1):8–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) Socialism, Capitalism and Democracy (Harper and Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
• Shan W, Walker G, Kogut B (1994) Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management J. 15(5):387–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Singh K (1997) The impact of technological complexity and interfirm cooperation on business survival. Acad. Management J. 40(2):339–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starkey K, Barnatt C, Tempest S (2000) Beyond networks and hierarchies: Latent organizations in the U.K. television industry. Organ. Sci. 11(3):299–305.Link, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high‐technology industry. Strategic Management J. 21(8):791–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):119–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company.” Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10-11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuten TL (2008) Advertising 2.0: Social Media Marketing in a Web 2.0 World. (Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH (1993) The emergence of an industrial infrastructure for technological innovation. J. Comput. Econom. 17(2):338–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• WARC (2015) Global ad trends 2015. Accessed March 9, 2020, http://www.warc.com.Google Scholar
• White S, Lui S (2005) Distinguishing costs of cooperation and control in alliances. Strategic Management J. 26(10):913–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Yin RK (1994) Case Study Research—Design and Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar