A Spanner in the Works: Category-Spanning Entrants and Audience Valuation of Incumbents

References

• Ahuja G, Lampert C (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6‐7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alois JD (2019) LendingClub rings the opening bell at NYSE as it marks 3 million borrowers. Crowdfund Insider (June 21), https://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2019/06/148658-lendingclub-rings -the-opening-bell-at-nyse-as-it-marks-3-million-borrowers/.Google Scholar
• Artinger S, Powell TC (2016) Entrepreneurial failure: Statistical and psychological explanations. Strategic Management J. 37(6):1047–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):329–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2012) Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1448–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1419–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ (2007) The incumbent discount: Stock market categories and response to radical technological change. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):703–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ (2010) Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and Internet telephony. Organ. Sci. 21(1):42–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Ranganathan R (2012) Offsetting illegitimacy? How pressures from securities analysts influence incumbents in the face of new technologies. Acad. Management J. 55(1):213–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Ranganathan R (2013) Divergent reactions to convergent strategies: Investor beliefs and analyst reactions during technological change. Organ. Sci. 24(2):378–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Ranganathan R (2017) Measuring up? Persistence and change in analyst’s evaluative schemas following technological change. Organ. Sci. 28(4):760–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Kahl SJ (2013) The process of schema emergence: Assimilation, deconstruction, unitization and the plurality of analogies. Acad. Management J. 56(1):14–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JY, Lo AW, MacKinlay AC (1997) The Econometrics of Financial Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Durand R, Levine DI, Touboul S (2016) Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1597–1614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (1997) The Innovator's Dilemma (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Raynor ME, McDonald R (2015) What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(12):44–53.Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, McDonald R, Altman EJ, Palmer JE (2018) Disruptive innovation: An intellectual history and directions for future research. J. Management Stud. 55(7):1043–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cocheo S (2019) If you launched a new bank today, what would it look like? The Financial Brand. Published April 3, 2019, https://thefinancialbrand.com/81705/new-banks-de-novo-charters/.Google Scholar
• Cohen SL, Bingham CB, Hallen BL (2019) The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):810–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz E, Rindova V, Ravasi D (2016) Combining logics to transform organizational agency: Blending industry and art at Alessi. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):347–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dans E (2018) Understanding the new banks. Medium (June 10), https://medium.com/enrique-dans/understanding-the-new-banks-f4d606849a18.Google Scholar
• David RJ, Sine WD, Haveman HA (2013) Seizing opportunity in emerging fields: How institutional entrepreneurs legitimated the professional form of management consulting. Organ. Sci. 24(2):356–377.Link, Google Scholar
• DiCamillo N (2019) A busy month for FinTech funding. American Banker (May 1), https://www.americanbanker.com/list/a-busy-month-for-FinTech-funding.Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005) When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Res. Policy 34(5):615–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1246–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR (2006) Internet companies’ growth strategies: Determinants of investment intensity and long‐term performance. Strategic Management J. 27(12):1183–1204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engler DE (2015) Is it a car or a truck?: Managerial beliefs, the choice of product architecture, and the emergence of the minivan market segment. Indust. Corporate Change 24(3):697–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ernst and Young (2017) Unleashing the potential of FinTech in banking. Report, Ernst and Young, London, England.Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (2015) A five-factor asset pricing model. J. Financial Econom. 116(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Bansal P (2017) Does a long‐term orientation create value? Evidence from a regression discontinuity. Strategic Management J. 38(9):1827–1847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Furr N, Kapoor R (2018) Capabilities, technologies, and firm exit during industry shakeout: Evidence from the global solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 39(1):33–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose R, Master K, Bajaj R, Russell C, Tian Y, Kong RP, Zhang J, (2019) Bank X: The new banks. Citi GPS report, New York.Google Scholar
• Gomber P, Kauffman R, Parker C, Weber B (2018) On the FinTech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(1):220–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers PA, Lerner J (2004) The Venture Capital Cycle (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Granqvist N, Grodal S, Woolley JL (2013) Hedging your bets: Explaining executives market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organ. Sci. 24(2):395–413.Link, Google Scholar
• Hainmueller J, Mummolo J, Xu Y (2019) How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Political Anal. 27(2):163–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallen BL, Eisenhardt KM (2012) Catalyzing strategies and efficient tie formation: How entrepreneurial firms obtain investment ties. Acad. Management J. 55(1):35–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hampel CE, Tracey P, Weber K (2020) The art of the pivot: How new ventures manage identification relationships with stakeholders as they change direction. Acad. Management J. 63(2):440–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R (1993) Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND J. Econom. 24(2):248–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH (2007) Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Res. Policy 36(5):722–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu HC, Reed AV, Rocholl J (2010) The new game in town: Competitive effects of IPOs. J. Finance 65(2):495–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iankov K (2019) LendingClub: Slowly recovering in the shadows. Seeking Alpha (March 13), https://seekingalpha.com/article/4248507-lendingclub-slowly-recovering-in-shadows.Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Lakhani KR (2014) Digital ubiquity: How connections, sensors, and data are revolutionizing business. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(11):90–99.Google Scholar
• Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagan J (2019) Financial technology – FinTech. Investopedia. Accessed March 2019, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/FinTech.asp.Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Klueter T (2015) Decoding the adaptability–rigidity puzzle: Evidence from pharmaceutical incumbents’ pursuit of gene therapy and monoclonal antibodies. Acad. Management J. 58(4):1180–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2014) Brokerage professions and implementing reform in an age of experts. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(5):912–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Nanda R (2009) Democratizing entry: Banking deregulations, financing constraints, and entrepreneurship. J. Financial Econom. 94(1):124–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamont O, Frazzini A (2007) The earnings announcement premium and trading volume. NBER Working Paper No. w13090. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Bach SB, Baik YS (2011) The impact of IPOs on the values of directly competing incumbents. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 5(2):158–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Hiatt SR, Lounsbury M (2017) Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organ. Sci. 28(3):447–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Struben J, Bingham CB (2018) Collective action and market formation: An integrative framework. Strategic Management J. 39(1):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung MD, Sharkey AJ (2014) Out of sight, out of mind? Evidence of perceptual factors in the multiple-category discount. Organ. Sci. 25(1):171–184.Link, Google Scholar
• Lo JYC, Kennedy MT (2014) Approval in nanotechnology patents: Micro and macro factors that affect reactions to category blending. Organ. Sci. 26(1):119–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):545–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Rao H (2004) Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944–1985. Soc. Forces 82(3):969–999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Gans JS, Hsu DH (2014) Dynamic commercialization strategies for disruptive technologies: Evidence from the speech recognition industry. Management Sci. 60(12):3103–3123.Link, Google Scholar
• McDonald RM, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and effective business-model design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald RM, Gao C (2019) Pivoting isn’t enough? Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1289–1318.Link, Google Scholar
• McDonald RM, Christensen CM, West D, Palmer JE (2018) Under Armour. Harvard Business School Case 9-618-020, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Murray F (2010) The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(2):341–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nash RM, Beardsley E (2015) The future of finance: The rise of the new shadow bank. Goldman Sachs Equity research report, New York.Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2016) Lead and Disrupt: How to Solve the Innovator’s Dilemma. (Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA).Google Scholar
• Pahnke E, McDonald RM, Wang D, Hallen B (2015) Exposed: Venture capital, competitor ties, and entrepreneurial innovation. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1334–1360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petkova AP, Rindova VP, Gupta AK (2013) No news is bad news: Sensegiving activities, media attention, and venture capital funding of new technology organizations. Organ. Sci. 24(3):865–888.Link, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Rindova VP (2003) Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 46(5):631–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2018) Category strategy for firm advantage. Strategy Sci. 3(4):620–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Kim R (2017) Strategic categorization. Durand R, Granqvist N, Tyllstrom A, eds. From Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 51 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, West Yorkshire, England), 71–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PwC (2016) Blurred lines: How FinTech is shaping financial services. Global FinTech report, PwC, London, UK.Google Scholar
• PwC (2019) Crossing the lines: How FinTech is propelling FS and TMT firms out of their lanes. Global FinTech report, PwC, London, UK.Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R, Glynn MA, Tushman M (2019) Frame flexibility: The role of cognitive and emotional framing in innovation adoption by incumbent firms. Strategic Management J. 40(7):1013–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Greve HR, Davis GF (2001) Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):502–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Petkova AP (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2):217–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosa JA, Porac JF, Runser-Spanjol J, Saxon MS (1999) Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Marketing 63(4, suppl. 1)64–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudegeair P (2016) What happens when you roll an online lender, a robo-adviser, and bitcoin into one? Wall Street Journal (December 23), https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-happens-when-you-roll-an-online-lender-a-robo-adviser-and-bitcoin-into-one-1482503342.Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Green E (2011) Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences. Res. Policy 40(10):1321–1331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1983), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle [Translated by R. Opie] (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
• Sharkey AJ (2014) Categories and organizational status: The role of industry status in the response to organizational deviance. Amer. J. Sociol. 119(5):1380–1433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharkey AJ, Bromley P (2015) Can ratings have indirect effects? Evidence from the organizational response to peers environmental ratings. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 39(1):63–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Grodal S, Gotsopoulos A (2015) Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry. Strategic Management J. 36(3):437–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ter Wal AL, Alexy O, Block J, Sander PG (2016) The best of both worlds: The benefits of open-specialized and closed-diverse syndication networks for new ventures success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):393–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):119–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Truelove E, Kellogg KC (2016) The radical flank effect and cross-occupational collaboration for technology development during a power shift. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):662–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E, Thomke S, Sonnack M (1999) Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77:47–57.Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Jennings PD (2014) Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1309–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zott C, Amit R (2007) Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 18(2):181–199.Link, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2000) Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):591–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2017) The categorical imperative revisited: Implications of categorization as a theoretical tool. From Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 51 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, West Yorkshire, England), 31–68.Crossref, Google Scholar